Angular momentum distribution of atomic hydrogen in excited states under ultra-short laser field

doi:10.1088/1674-1056/adfdc6

Abstract We investigate the population distribution of excited angular momentum ($l$) states in the interaction between a hydrogen atom and an ultra-short laser pulse. Through numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, we theoretically investigate the laser-induced oscillations among excited $l$-states. Temporal evolution analysis reveals distinctive signatures of both multiphoton excitation and frustrated tunneling ionization processes. Specifically, multiphoton excitation dominates during the final optical cycle as the laser peak intensity attenuates, thereby critically determining the final $l$-states population distribution. We demonstrate that the angular quantum states' parity effect does not persist, even for ultra-short pulses with broad frequency bandwidths. The parity effect is also unaffected by laser field asymmetry.

Keywords: ultra-short laser pulses excited angular momentum states time-dependent Schrödinger equation parity effect

Received: 10 June 2025
Revised: 10 August 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 21 August 2025

PACS:	32.80.-t	(Photoionization and excitation)
	32.80.Rm	(Multiphoton ionization and excitation to highly excited states)
	31.70.Hq	(Time-dependent phenomena: excitation and relaxation processes, and reaction rates)

Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12374241 and 12374263).

Corresponding Authors: Zhaoyan Zhou
E-mail: cnzhzhy@nudt.edu.cn

Cite this article:

Zhaoyan Zhou(周兆妍)†, Dongwen Zhang(张栋文), and Zengxiu Zhao(赵增秀) Angular momentum distribution of atomic hydrogen in excited states under ultra-short laser field 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 033201

[1] Muller H G, van Linden van den Heuvell H B, Agostini P, Petite G, Antonetti A, Franco M and Migus A 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 565
[2] Jones R R, Schumacher D W and Bucksbaum P H 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 R49
[3] Rottke H, Wolf-Rottke B, Feldmann D, Welge K H, Dörr M, Potvliege R M and Shakeshaft R 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 4837
[4] Wang B, Li X, Fu P, Chen J and Liu J 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 2729
[5] Nubbemeyer T, Gorling K, Saenz A, Eichmann U and Sandner W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 233001
[6] Becker W, Grasbon F, Kopold R, Milošević D B, Paulus G G and Walther H 2002 Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48 35
[7] Milošević D B and Ehlotzky F 2003 Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49 373
[8] Luo J H and Xiao J J 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 027801
[9] Keldysh L V 1965 Sov. Phys.-JETP 20 1307
[10] Li Q, Tong X M, Morishita T, Wei H and Lin C D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023421
[11] Li Q, Tong X M, Morishita T, Wei H and Lin C D 2014 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47 204019
[12] Zimmermann H, Patchkovskii S, Ivanov M and Eichmann U 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 013003
[13] Hu S, Hao X, Lv H, Liu M, Yang T, Xu H, Jin M, Ding D, Li Q and Chen J 2019 Opt. Express 27 31629
[14] Xu S, Liu M, Hu S, Shu Z, Quan W, Xiao Z, Zhou Y, Wei M, Zhao M, Sun R, Wang Y, Hua L, Gong C, Lai X and Chen J 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 043104
[15] Corkum P 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994
[16] Shvetsov-Shilovski N, Goreslavski S, Popruzhenko S and Becker W 2009 Laser Phys. 19 1550
[17] Landsman A, Pfeiffer A, Hofmann C, Smolarski M, Cirelli C and Keller U 2013 New J. Phys. 15 013001
[18] Huang K, Xia Q and Fu L 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 033415
[19] Zhao L, Dong J, Lv H, Yang T, Lian Y, Jin M, Xu H, Ding D, Hu S and Chen J 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 053403
[20] Yun H, Mun J H, Hwang S I, Park S B, Ivanov I A, Nam C H and Kim K T 2018 Nat. Photon. 12 620
[21] Ortmann L, Hofmann C, Ivanov I A and Landsman A S 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 063112
[22] Venzke J, Reiff R, Xue Z, Jaroń-Becker A and Becker A 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 043434
[23] Chetty D, Glover R D, deHarak B A, Tong X M, Xu H, Pauly T, Smith N, Hamilton K R, Bartschat K, Ziegel J P, Douguet N, Luiten A N, Light P S, Litvinyuk I V and Sang R T 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 053402
[24] Chetty D, Glover R D, Tong X M, deHarak B A, Xu H, Haram N, Bartschat K, Palme A J, Luiten A N, Light P S, Litvinyuk I V and Sang R T 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 173201
[25] Piraux B, Mota-Furtado F, O’Mahony P F, Galstyan A and Popov Yu. V 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 043403
[26] Harris D O, Engerholm G G and Gwinn W D 1965 J. Chem. Phys. 43 1515
[27] Dickinson A S and Certain P R 1968 J. Chem. Phys. 49 4209
[28] Light J C and Walker R B 1976 J. Chem. Phys. 65 4272
[29] Tong X M and Chu S I 1997 Chem. Phys. 217 119

[1]	3D-GTDSE: A GPU-based code for solving 3D-TDSE in Cartesian coordinates Ke Peng(彭科), Aihua Liu(刘爱华), Jun Wang(王俊), and Xi Zhao(赵曦). Chin. Phys. B, 2025, 34(9): 094203.
[2]	Momentum distributions of symmetric (H₂⁺) and asymmetric (HeH²⁺) molecular ions in a circularly polarized laser field under different ionization mechanisms Xin-Yu Hao(郝欣宇), Shu-Juan Yan(闫淑娟), Ying Guo(郭颖), and Jing Guo(郭静). Chin. Phys. B, 2024, 33(12): 123401.
[3]	Phase-coherence dynamics of frequency-comb emission via high-order harmonic generation in few-cycle pulse trains Chang-Tong Liang(梁畅通), Jing-Jing Zhang(张晶晶), and Peng-Cheng Li(李鹏程). Chin. Phys. B, 2023, 32(3): 033201.
[4]	Calibration of quantitative rescattering model for simulating vortex high-order harmonic generation driven by Laguerre-Gaussian beam with nonzero orbital angular momentum Jiaxin Han(韩嘉鑫), Zhong Guan(管仲), Beiyu Wang(汪倍羽), and Cheng Jin(金成). Chin. Phys. B, 2023, 32(12): 124210.
[5]	LEVEL STATISTICS AND PARITY EFFECT ON SMALL SUPERCONDUCTING SYSTEMS Chen Zhi-qian (陈志谦), Zheng Ren-rong (郑仁蓉). Chin. Phys. B, 2001, 10(12): 1149-1153.

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Metrics
Related Articles

Angular momentum distribution of atomic hydrogen in excited states under ultra-short laser field

Cite this article:

Online attention