ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Lamb wave TDTE super-resolution imaging assisted by deep learning |
Liu-Jia Sun(孙刘家), Qing-Bang Han(韩庆邦)†, and Qi-Lin Jin(靳琪琳) |
College of Information Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou 213200, China |
|
|
Abstract Ultrasonic Lamb waves undergo complex mode conversion and diffraction at non-penetrating defects, such as plate corrosion and cracks. Lamb wave imaging has a resolution limit due to the guided wave dispersion characteristics and Rayleigh criterion limitations. In this paper, a full convolutional network is designed to segment and reconstruct the received signals, enabling the automatic identification of target modalities. This approach eliminates clutter and mode conversion interference when calculating direct and accompanying acoustic fields in time-domain topological energy (TDTE) imaging. Subsequently, the measured accompanying acoustic field is reversed for adaptive focusing on defects and enhance the imaging quality. To circumvent the limitations of the Rayleigh criterion, the direct acoustic field and the accompanying acoustic field were fused to characterize the pixel distribution in the imaging region, achieving Lamb wave super-resolution imaging. Experimental results indicate that compared to the sign coherence factor-total focusing method (SCF-TFM), the proposed method achieves a 31.41% improvement in lateral resolution and a 29.53% increase in signal-to-noise ratio for single-blind-hole defects. In the case of multiple-blind-hole defects with spacings greater than the Rayleigh criterion resolution limit, it exhibits a 27.23% enhancement in signal-to-noise ratio. On the contrary, when the defect spacings are relatively smaller than the limit, this method has a higher resolution limit than SCF-TFM in super-resolution imaging.
|
Received: 12 September 2024
Revised: 08 October 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 18 October 2024
|
PACS:
|
43.35.+d
|
(Ultrasonics, quantum acoustics, and physical effects of sound)
|
|
43.25.+y
|
(Nonlinear acoustics)
|
|
43.20.Mv
|
(Waveguides, wave propagation in tubes and ducts)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12174085), the Key Research and Development Project of Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. CE20235054), and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. KYCX24_0833). |
Corresponding Authors:
Qing-Bang Han
E-mail: 20111841@hhu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Liu-Jia Sun(孙刘家), Qing-Bang Han(韩庆邦), and Qi-Lin Jin(靳琪琳) Lamb wave TDTE super-resolution imaging assisted by deep learning 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 014301
|
[1] Ding X Y, Zhao Y X, DengMX, Shui G S and Hu N 2020 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 171 105371 [2] Sun M X and Qu J M 2020 Ultrasonics 108 106180 [3] Wang J S, Xu C B, Zhao Y X, Hu N and Deng M X 2020 Materials 13 3318 [4] Huan Q, Chen M T, Su Z Q and Li F X 2019 Ultrasonics 97 29 [5] Nicolas Quaegebeur and Patrice Masson 2012 Ultrasonics 52 1056 [6] Dai Y X, Yan S G and Zhang B X 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 074301 [7] Li F Z and Luo Y 2021 Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 34 404 [8] Cheng T, et al. 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 040303 [9] ZhuWF, Xiang Y X and Zhang H Y, et al. 2023 Mech. Syst. Signal Pr. 190 110121 [10] Wang J S, et al. 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 014301 [11] Zhang W J, Chai X D, Zhu W F, Zheng S B, Fan G P, Li Z W, Zhang H and Zhang H F 2023 Meas. Sci. Technol. 34 055406 [12] Fink M 1992 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 39 555 [13] Fink M 2001 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 2615 [14] Camacho J, Brizuela J and Fritsch C 2010 American Institute of Physics 1211 855 [15] Liu Z H, Sun K M, Song G R, He C F and Wu B 2016 Mech. Syst. Signal Pr. 70-71 625 [16] Prado V, Higuti R, Kitano C, et al. 2013 NDT & E International 59 86 [17] Dominguez N and Gibiat V 2010 Ultrasonics 50 367 [18] Sun L J, Zhu W F, Shao W, et al. 2021 Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 332 113102 [19] Song H M and Yang Y C 2020 NDT & E International 116 102344 [20] Ewald V, Sridaran R, Venkat A, et al. 2021 Mech. Syst. Signal Pr. 165 108153 [21] Su C H, Jiang M S and Lv S S, et al. 2019 IEEE Sensors Journal 19 5784 [22] Hu L L, Zheng X D, Duan Y T, Yan X F, Hu Y and Zhang X L 2018 Geophysics 84 U45 [23] Mousavi S M, Ellsworth W L, Zhu W Q, et al. 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 3952 [24] Jiang W B, Xi C P and Wang W C, et al. 2021 IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60 5903610 [25] Yuan S Y, Liu J W and Wang S X, et al. 2017 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 15 272 [26] ZhuWQ and Beroza G C 2019 Geophysical Journal International 216 261 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|