|
|
Static-to-kinematic modeling and experimental validation of tendon-driven quasi continuum manipulators with nonconstant subsegment stiffness |
Xian-Jie Zheng(郑先杰), Meng Ding(丁萌), Liao-Xue Liu(刘辽雪), Lu Wang(王璐), and Yu Guo(郭毓)† |
School of Automation, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China |
|
|
Abstract Continuum robots with high flexibility and compliance have the capability to operate in confined and cluttered environments. To enhance the load capacity while maintaining robot dexterity, we propose a novel non-constant subsegment stiffness structure for tendon-driven quasi continuum robots (TDQCRs) comprising rigid-flexible coupling subsegments. Aiming at real-time control applications, we present a novel static-to-kinematic modeling approach to gain a comprehensive understanding of the TDQCR model. The analytical subsegment-based kinematics for the multisection manipulator is derived based on screw theory and product of exponentials formula, and the static model considering gravity loading, actuation loading, and robot constitutive laws is established. Additionally, the effect of tension attenuation caused by routing channel friction is considered in the robot statics, resulting in improved model accuracy. The root-mean-square error between the outputs of the static model and the experimental system is less than 1.63% of the arm length (0.5 m). By employing the proposed static model, a mapping of bending angles between the configuration space and the subsegment space is established. Furthermore, motion control experiments are conducted on our TDQCR system, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the static-to-kinematic model.
|
Received: 18 July 2023
Revised: 22 August 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 19 September 2023
|
PACS:
|
07.05.Tp
|
(Computer modeling and simulation)
|
|
07.07.Tw
|
(Servo and control equipment; robots)
|
|
45.20.D-
|
(Newtonian mechanics)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61973167) and the Jiangsu Funding Program for Excellent Postdoctoral Talent. |
Corresponding Authors:
Yu Guo
E-mail: guoyu@njust.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xian-Jie Zheng(郑先杰), Meng Ding(丁萌), Liao-Xue Liu(刘辽雪), Lu Wang(王璐), and Yu Guo(郭毓) Static-to-kinematic modeling and experimental validation of tendon-driven quasi continuum manipulators with nonconstant subsegment stiffness 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 010703
|
[1] Ba W M, Dong X, Mohammad A, Wang M F, Axinte D and Norton A 2021 IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 26 3010 [2] Mohammad A, Russo M, Fang Y H, Dong X, Axinte D and Kell J 2021 IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6 7493 [3] Wang M Y, Du L, Yuan J J, Ma S G and Bao S 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), December 27-31, Sanya, China, p. 74 [4] Müller D, Veil C, Seidel M and Sawodny O 2020 Mechatronics 70 102418 [5] Dupont PE, Simaan N, Choset H and Rucker C 2022 Proc. IEEE Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng. 110 847 [6] Peng Y, Liu Y G, Yang Y, Liu N, Sun Y, Liu Y Y, Pu H Y, Xie S R and Luo J 2019 Mechatronics 60 56 [7] He B, Zhang C H and Ding A 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 126102 [8] Rus D and Tolley M T 2015 Nature 521 467 [9] Hemami A 1985 Robotics 1 27 [10] Wooten M B and Walker I D 2022 IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7 10136 [11] Yuan H and Li Z 2018 Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 49 240 [12] Mo H J, Wei R F, Ouyang B, Xing L X, Shan Y H, Liu Y H and Sun D 2021 IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6 1074 [13] Wang Q, Yong Y Q and Bai Z M 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 128801 [14] Uppalapati N K and Krishnan G 2021 J. Mech. Robot. 13 011010 [15] Qin L, Liang X Q, Huang H, Chui C K, Yeow R C and Zhu J 2019 Soft Robot. 6 455 [16] Tamadon I, Huan Y, de Groot A G, Menciassi A and Sinibaldi E 2020 Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg 16 e2072 [17] Yukisawa T, Ishii Y, Nishikawa S, Niiyama R and Kuniyoshi Y 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) December 5-8, Macau, Macao, p. 2303 [18] Sui D B, Zhao S K, Wang T S, Liu Y B, Zhu Y H and Zhao J 2022 J. Bionic Eng. [19] Xu K and Simaan N 2010 J. Mech. Robot. 2 011006 [20] Zhao B, Zhang W H, Zhang Z Y, Zhu X Y and Xu K 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) October 01-05, Madrid, Spain, p. 7492 [21] Yeshmukhametov A, Koganezawa K and Yamamoto Y 2019 Robotics 8 51 [22] Wang M F, Dong X, Ba W M, Mohammad A, Axinte D and Norton A 2021 Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 67 102054 [23] Li M H, Kang R J, Geng S N and Guglielmino E 2018 Trans. Inst. Meas. Control. 40 3263 [24] Barrientos-Diez J, Dong X, Axinte D and Kell J 2021 Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 67 102019 [25] Della Santina C, Bicchi A and Rus D 2020 IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5 1001 [26] Greigarn T and Çavuşoǧlu M C 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems September 14-88, Chicago, IL, USA, p. 3476 [27] Jones B A, Gray R L and Turlapati K 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems October 10-15, St. Louis, MO, USA, p. 2659 [28] Chen Y Y, Wu B B, Jin J B and Xu K 2021 IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6 1590 [29] Renda F, Boyer F, Dias J and Seneviratne L 2018 IEEE Trans. Robot. 34 1518 [30] Grazioso S, Di Gironimo G and Siciliano B 2019 Soft Robot. 6 790 [31] Venkiteswaran V K, Sikorski J and Misra S 2019 Mech. Mach. Theory 139 34 [32] Thuruthel T G, Falotico E, Manti M, Pratesi A, Cianchetti M and Laschi C 2017 Soft Robot. 4 285 [33] Giorelli M, Renda F, Calisti M, Arienti A, Ferri G and Laschi C 2015 IEEE Trans. Robot. 31 823 [34] Elgeneidy K, Lohse N and Jackson M 2018 Mechatronics 50 234 [35] Lynch K M and Park F C 2017 Modern Robotics (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press) p. 118 [36] Keller S G and Gordon A P 2011 Strain Anal. Eng. Des 46 405 [37] Krogius M, Haggenmiller A and Olson E 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) November 03-08, Macau, China, p. 1898 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|