|
|
Surface active agents stabilize nanodroplets and enhance haze formation |
Yunqing Ma(马韵箐), Changsheng Chen(陈昌盛), and Xianren Zhang(张现仁)† |
State Key Laboratory of Organic-inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China |
|
|
Abstract Although many organic molecules found commonly in the atmosphere are known to be surface-active in aqueous solutions, their effects on the mechanisms underlying haze formation remain unclear. In this paper, based on a simple thermodynamic analysis, we report that the adsorption of amphiphilic organics alone not only lowers the surface tension, but also unexpectedly stabilizes nanodroplets of specific size under water vapor supersaturation. Then we determine how various factors, including relative humidity, water activity effect due to dissolution of inorganic components as well as surface tension effect due to surface adsorption of organic components, cooperatively induce the stability of nanodroplets. The nanodroplet stability behaviors not captured in the current theory would change the formation mechanism of haze droplets, from the hygroscopic growth pathway to a nonclassical two-step nucleation pathway.
|
Received: 09 November 2020
Revised: 09 November 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 13 November 2020
|
PACS:
|
05.70.Np
|
(Interface and surface thermodynamics)
|
|
64.60.Q-
|
(Nucleation)
|
|
92.60.Mt
|
(Particles and aerosols)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21978007) |
Corresponding Authors:
†Corresponding author. E-mail: zhangxr@mail.buct.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yunqing Ma(马韵箐), Changsheng Chen(陈昌盛), and Xianren Zhang(张现仁) Surface active agents stabilize nanodroplets and enhance haze formation 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 010504
|
1 Zhang R, Khalizov A, Wang L, Hu M and Xu W 2012 Chem. Rev. 112 1957 2 Hegg D A and Baker M B 2009 Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 056801 3 Kulmala M, Kontkanen J, Junninen H, et al.2013 Science 339 943 4 Huang R, Zhang Y, Bozztti C, et al.2014 Nature 514 218 5 Guo S, Hu M, Peng J, et al.2020 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117 3427 6 Guo S, Hu M, Zamora M L, et al.2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 17373 7 Yue D L, Hu M, Zhang R Y, et al.2010 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 4953 8 Zhao Z, Kong K, Wang S, et al.2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 1126 9 Petters M D and Kreidenweis S M 2007 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 1961 10 Lee A K Y, Ling T Y and Chan C K.2008 Faraday Discuss. 137 245 11 Kanakidou M, Seinfeld J H, Pandis S N, et al.2005 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5 1053 12 Ovadnevaite J, Zuend A, Laaksonen A, et al.2017 Nature 546 637 13 Prisle N L, Raatikainen T, Laaksonen A and Bilde M 2010 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 5663 14 Ruehl C R, Davies J F and Wilson K R 2016 Science 351 1447 15 Konopka P 1996 J. Atmos. Sci. 55 3157 16 Kohler H 1936 Trans. Farad. Soc. 32 1152 17 McFiggans G, Artaxo P, Baltensperger U, et al.2006 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6 2593 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|