Special Issue:
SPECIAL TOPIC — Ultracold atom and its application in precision measurement
|
SPECIAL TOPIC—Ultracold atom and its application in precision measurement |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using 85Rb-87Rb dual-species atom interferometer |
Wei-Tao Duan(段维涛)1,2, Chuan He(何川)1,2, Si-Tong Yan(闫思彤)1,3, Yu-Hang Ji(冀宇航)1, Lin Zhou(周林)1,2,3, Xi Chen(陈曦)1,2,3, Jin Wang(王谨)1,2,3, Ming-Sheng Zhan(詹明生)1,2,3 |
1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan 430071, China; 2 School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3 Center for Cold Atoms Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China |
|
|
Abstract Coriolis effect is an important error source in the weak equivalence principle (WEP) test using atom interferometer. In this paper, the problem of Coriolis error in WEP test is studied theoretically and experimentally. In theoretical simulation, the Coriolis effect is analyzed by establishing an error model. The measurement errors of Eötvös coefficient (η) in WEP test related to experimental parameters, such as horizontal-velocity difference and horizontal-position difference of atomic clouds, horizontal-position difference of detectors, and rotation compensation of Raman laser's mirror are calculated. In experimental investigation, the position difference between 85Rb and 87Rb atomic clouds is reduced to 0.1 mm by optimizing the experimental parameters, an alternating detection method is used to suppress the error caused by detection position difference, thus the Coriolis error related to the atomic clouds and detectors is reduced to 1.1×10-9. This Coriolis error is further corrected by compensating the rotation of Raman laser's mirror, and the total uncertainty of η measurement related to the Coriolis effect is reduced as δη=4.4×10 -11.
|
Received: 31 March 2020
Revised: 04 May 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.75.Dg
|
(Atom and neutron interferometry)
|
|
06.30.Gv
|
(Velocity, acceleration, and rotation)
|
|
37.25.+k
|
(Atom interferometry techniques)
|
|
32.80.Qk
|
(Coherent control of atomic interactions with photons)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0302002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91736311 and 11574354), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB21010100), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2016300). |
Corresponding Authors:
Lin Zhou, Jin Wang
E-mail: lzhou@wipm.ac.cn;wangjin@wipm.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Wei-Tao Duan(段维涛), Chuan He(何川), Si-Tong Yan(闫思彤), Yu-Hang Ji(冀宇航), Lin Zhou(周林), Xi Chen(陈曦), Jin Wang(王谨), Ming-Sheng Zhan(詹明生) Suppression of Coriolis error in weak equivalence principle test using 85Rb-87Rb dual-species atom interferometer 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 070305
|
[1] |
Wang J 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 053702
|
[2] |
Kasevich M A and Chu S 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 181
|
[3] |
Peters A, Chung K Y and Chu S 1999 Nature 400 849
|
[4] |
Zhou L, Xiong Z Y, Yang W, Tang B, Peng W C, Wang Y B, Xu P, Wang J and Zhan M S 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 013701
|
[5] |
Merlet S, Bodart Q, Malossi N, Landragin A, Pereira Dos Santos F, Gitlein O and Timmen L 2010 Metrologia 47 L9
|
[6] |
Poli N, Wang F Y, Tarallo M G, Alberti A, Prevedelli M and Tino G M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 038501
|
[7] |
Hu Z K, Sun B L, Duan X C, Zhou M K, Chen L L, Zhan S, Zhang Q Z and Luo J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043610
|
[8] |
Bidel Y, Carraz O, Charriére R, Cadoret M, Zahzam N and Bresson A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 144107
|
[9] |
Wu B, Wang Z, Cheng B, Wang Q, Xu A and Lin Q 2014 Metrologia 51 452
|
[10] |
Wang S K, Zhao Y, Zhuang W, Li T C, Wu S Q, Feng J Y and Li C J 2018 Metrologia 55 360
|
[11] |
Huang P W, Tang B, Chen X, Zhong J Q, Xiong Z Y, Zhou L, Wang J and Zhan M S 2019 Metrologia 56 045012
|
[12] |
Snadden M J, McGuirk J M, Bouyer P, Haritos K G and Kasevich M A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 971
|
[13] |
Duan X C, Zhou M K, Mao D K, Yao H B, Deng X B, Luo J and Hu Z K 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023617
|
[14] |
Wang Y P, Zhong J Q, Song H W, Zhu L, Li Y M, Chen X, Li R B, Wang J and Zhan M S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 053612
|
[15] |
Canuel B, Leduc F, Holleville D, Gauguet A, Fils J, Virdis A, Clairon A, Dimarcq N, Borde C J, Landragin A and Bouyer P 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 010402
|
[16] |
Tackmann G, Berg P, Schubert C, Abend S, Gilowski M, Ertmer W and Rasel E M 2012 New J. Phys. 14 015002
|
[17] |
Dickerson S M, Hogan J M, Sugarbaker A, Johnson D M S and Kasevich M A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 083001
|
[18] |
Yao Z W, Lu S B, Li R B, Wang K, Cao L, Wang J and Zhan M S 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 083701
|
[19] |
Yao Z W, Lu S B, Li R B, Luo J, Wang J and Zhan M S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013620
|
[20] |
Fray S, Diez C A, Hänsch T W and Weitz M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 240404
|
[21] |
Bonnin A, Zahzam N, Bidel Y and Bresson A 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043615
|
[22] |
Schlippert D, Hartwig J, Albers H, Richardson L L, Schubert C, Roura A, Schleich W P, Ertmer W and Rasel E M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 203002
|
[23] |
Tarallo M G, Mazzoni T, Poli N, Sutyrin D V, Zhang X and Tino G M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 023005
|
[24] |
Zhou L, Long S T, Tang B, Chen X, Gao F, Peng W C, Duan W T, Zhong J Q, Xiong Z Y, Wang J, Zhang Y Z and Zhan M S 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 013004
|
[25] |
Barrett B, Antoni-Micollier L, Chichet L, Battelier B, Lévéque T, Landragin A and Bouyer P 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13786
|
[26] |
Duan X C, Zhou M K, Deng X B, Yao H B, Shao C G, Luo J and Hu Z K 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 023001
|
[27] |
Rosi G, D'Amico G, Cacciapuoti L, Sorrentino F, Prevedelli M, Zych M, Brukner Č and Tino G M 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15529
|
[28] |
Zhang K, Zhou M K, Cheng Y, Chen L L, Luo Q, Xu W J, Cao L S, Duan X C and Hu Z K 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 043701
|
[29] |
Zhou L, He C, Yan S T, Chen X, Duan W T, Xu R D, Zhou C, Ji Y H, Bathwal S, Wang Q, Hou Z, Xiong Z Y, Gao D F, Zhang Y Z, Ni W T, Wang J and Zhan M S 2019 arXiv:1904.07096 [quant-ph]
|
[30] |
Freier C, Hauth M, Schkolnik V, Leykauf B, Schilling M, Wziontek H, Scherneck H G, Müller J and Peters A 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 723 012050
|
[31] |
Fu Z J, Wu B, Cheng B, Zhou Y, Weng K, Zhu D, Wang Z and Lin Q 2019 Metrologia 56 025001
|
[32] |
Wu X, Pagel Z, Malek B S, Nguyen T H, Zi F, Scheirer D S and Müller H 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaax0800
|
[33] |
Peters A, Chung K Y and Chu S 2001 Metrologia 38 25
|
[34] |
Louchet-Chauvet A, Farah T, Bodart Q, Clairon A, Landragin A, Merlet S and Pereira Dos Santos F 2011 New J. Phys. 13 065025
|
[35] |
Lan S Y, Kuan P C, Estey B, Haslinger P and Müller H 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 090402
|
[36] |
Bongs K, Launay R and Kasevich M A 2006 Appl. Phys. B 84 599
|
[37] |
Farah T, Gillot P, Cheng B, Landragin A, Merlet S and Pereira Dos Santos F 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023606
|
[38] |
Hogan J M, Johnson D M S and Kasevich M A 2008 arXiv:0806.3261v1 [physics.atom-ph]
|
[39] |
Zhou L, Xiong Z Y, Yang W, Tang B, Peng W C, Hao K, Li R B, Liu M, Wang J and Zhan M S 2011 Gen. Relat. Gravit. 43 1931
|
[40] |
Foster G T, Fixler J B, McGuirk J M and Kasevich M A 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 951
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|