ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
High common mode rejection ratio InP 90° optical hybrid in ultra-broadband at 60 nm with deep-rigded waveguide based on ×4 MMI coupler |
Zi-Qing Lu(陆子晴)1,2, Qin Han(韩勤)1,2,3, Han Ye(叶焓)1,2, Shuai Wang(王帅)1,2, Feng Xiao(肖峰)1,2, Fan Xiao(肖帆)1,2 |
1 State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China; 2 Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3 School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract An InP optical 90° hybrid based on a×4 MMI coupler with a deep ridged waveguide is designed and fabricated. The working principle of the 90° hybrid is systematically introduced. Three-dimensional beam ropagation method (3D BPM) is used to optimize the structure parameters of the 90° hybrid. The designed compact structure is demonatrated to have a low excess loss less than -0.15 dB, a high common mode rejection ratio better than 40 dB, and a low relative phase deviation less than ±2.5°. The designed hybrid is manufactured on a sandwitched structure deposited on an InP substrate. The measured results show that the common mode rejection ratios are larger than 20 dB in a range from 1520 nm to 1580 nm. The phase deviations are less than ±5° in a range from 1545 nm to 1560 nm and less than ±7° across the C band. The designed 90° optical hybrid is suitable well for realizing miniaturization, high-properties, and high bandwidth of coherent receiver.
|
Received: 17 December 2019
Revised: 26 December 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.79.Sz
|
(Optical communication systems, multiplexers, and demultiplexers?)
|
|
42.25.Hz
|
(Interference)
|
|
42.79.Gn
|
(Optical waveguides and couplers)
|
|
42.82.Fv
|
(Hybrid systems)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0402404), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. 4194093), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61635010, 61674136, and 61435002). |
Corresponding Authors:
Qin Han
E-mail: hanqin@semi.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Zi-Qing Lu(陆子晴), Qin Han(韩勤), Han Ye(叶焓), Shuai Wang(王帅), Feng Xiao(肖峰), Fan Xiao(肖帆) High common mode rejection ratio InP 90° optical hybrid in ultra-broadband at 60 nm with deep-rigded waveguide based on ×4 MMI coupler 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 054206
|
[1] |
Yamamoto Y and Kimura T 1981 J. Quantum Electron 17 919
|
[2] |
Kimura T 1987 J. Lightwave Technol. 5 414
|
[3] |
Ip E, Lau A P T and Barros D J F 2008 Opt. Express 16 753
|
[4] |
Gregory R, Andrew A and Peter J W 2014 J. Lightwave Technol. 32 824
|
[5] |
Sun H 2008 Opt. Express 16 873
|
[6] |
Pinto A N, Amado S B and Martins C S 2015 17th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), July 5-9, Budapest, Hungary
|
[7] |
Nakazawa M 2010 Optical and Fiber Communications Reports, Vol. 6 (Switzerland AG: Springer Nature) pp. 51-80
|
[8] |
Yamazaki E, Yamanaka S and Kisaka Y 2011 Opt. Express 19 13179
|
[9] |
Deng X, Liu J, Jiao D D, Gao J, Zang Q, Xu G J, Dong R F, Liu T and Zhang S G 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 114202
|
[10] |
Su Y L, Feng H, Hu H, Wang W, Duan T, Wang Y S, Si J H, Xie X P, Yang H N and Huang X N 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 024216
|
[11] |
Shi K, Smyth F and Reid D 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 1616
|
[12] |
Yi X, Yu R and Kurumida J 2010 J. Lightwave Technol. 28 587
|
[13] |
Meloni G, Paolucci F and Sambo N 2011 37th European Conference & Exhibition on Optical Communication, Spetempber 18-22, 2011, Geneva, Switzerland
|
[14] |
Chan C K, Jia W and Liu Z 2011 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference and Exhibition (ACP), November 13-16, 2011, Shanghai, China
|
[15] |
Patnaik B and Sahu P K 2013 Int. J. Sig. Imag. Syst. Eng. 6 3
|
[16] |
Seimetz M and Weinert C M 2006 J. Lightwave Technol. 24 1317
|
[17] |
Patrick R, Stefan S and Angela S 2012 38th European Conference & Exhibition on Optical Communications, September 16-20, 2012, Amsterdam, Netherlands
|
[18] |
Yang W, Yin M, Li Y P, Wang X J and Wang Z Y 2013 Opt. Express 21 28423
|
[19] |
Shibata J, Nakao I and Sasai Y 1984 Appl. Phys. Lett. 45 191
|
[20] |
Wang Z, Zhai Y, Lu Y, Xu J, Sun X B and Wang J 2018 Opt. Commun. 426 99
|
[21] |
Paul M, John M, Graeme B and Nicholas P 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Coference and Exhibition, March 19-23, 2017, Los Angeles, CA, USA
|
[22] |
Xu L H, Wang Y, Patel D, Morsy-Osman M, Li R, Hui M, Parvizi M, Ben-Hamida N and V plant D 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Coference and Exposition, March 11-15, 2018, Sab Duegi, CA, USA
|
[23] |
Doerr C R, Gill D M, Gnauck A H, Buhl L L, Winzer P J, Cappuzzo M A, Wong-Foy A, Chen E Y and Gomez L T 2006 J. Lightwave Technol. 24 171
|
[24] |
Patrick R, Stefan S, Angela S, Klemens J, Jens S, Dirk T, Patrick D and Mads L N 2012 Opt. Express 20 B250
|
[25] |
Lars Z, Karsten V, Georg W, Klaus P and Carl M W 2009 Photon. Technol. Lett. 21 143
|
[26] |
Deri R J, Pennings E C M, Scherer A, Gozdz A S, Caneau C, Andreadakis N C, Shah V, Curtis L, Hawkins R J, Soole J B D and Song J I 1992 Photon. Technol. Lett. 4 1238
|
[27] |
Masaru T, Yoshihiro T and Shoichi O 2013 39th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC 2013), September 22-26, 2013, London, UK
|
[28] |
Islam M S, Murthy S, Itoh T and Wu M C 2001 IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 49 1914
|
[29] |
Saif Islam M, Thomas J, Itoh T, Wu M C, Nespola A, Sivco D L and Cho A Y 2002 J. Lightwave Technol. 20 285
|
[30] |
Lv Q Q, Pan P, Ye H, Yin D D, Wang Y B, Yang X H and Han Q 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 038505
|
[31] |
Zhang Y, Zuo Y H, Guo J C, Ding W C, Cheng B W, Yu J Z and Wang Q M 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 2223
|
[32] |
Soldano L B and Pennings E C M 1995 J. Lightwave Technol. 13 615
|
[33] |
Bachmann M, Besse P A and Melchior H 1994 Appl. Opt. 33 3905
|
[34] |
Guo F, Lu D, Zhang R K, Wang H T, Wang W and Ji C 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 024203
|
[35] |
Yu T, Li H, Cao Z, Wang Y, Shen Q and He Y 2008 Opt. Lett. 33 1001
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|