CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Three- and two-dimensional calculations for the interface anisotropy dependence of magnetic properties of exchange-spring Nd2Fe14B/α-Fe multilayers with out-of-plane easy axes |
Qian Zhao(赵倩)1, Xin-Xin He(何鑫鑫)1, Francois-Jacques Morvan(李文瀚)2, Guo-Ping Zhao(赵国平)1,3, Zhu-Bai Li(李柱柏)1 |
1 Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory for Utilization of Bayan Obo Multi-Metallic Resources, Elected State Key Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, College of Science, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China; 2 Ningbo Institute of Industrial Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China; 3 College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China |
|
|
Abstract Hysteresis loops, energy products and magnetic moment distributions of perpendicularly oriented Nd2Fe14B/α-Fe exchange-spring multilayers are studied systematically based on both three-dimensional (3D) and one-dimensional (1D) micromagnetic methods, focused on the influence of the interface anisotropy. The calculated results are carefully compared with each other. The interface anisotropy effect is very palpable on the nucleation, pinning and coercive fields when the soft layer is very thin. However, as the soft layer thickness increases, the pinning and coercive fields are almost unchanged with the increment of interface anisotropy though the nucleation field still monotonically rises. Negative interface anisotropy decreases the maximum energy products and increases slightly the angles between the magnetization and applied field. The magnetic moment distributions in the thickness direction at various applied fields demonstrate a progress of three-step magnetic reversal, i.e., nucleation, evolution and irreversible motion of the domain wall. The above results calculated by two models are in good agreement with each other. Moreover, the in-plane magnetic moment orientations based on two models are different. The 3D calculation shows a progress of generation and disappearance of vortex state, however, the magnetization orientations within the film plane calculated by the 1D model are coherent. Simulation results suggest that negative interface anisotropy is necessarily avoided experimentally.
|
Received: 23 October 2019
Revised: 06 January 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
75.70.Cn
|
(Magnetic properties of interfaces (multilayers, superlattices, heterostructures))
|
|
75.40.Mg
|
(Numerical simulation studies)
|
|
75.30.Gw
|
(Magnetic anisotropy)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0700900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51571126 and 51861030), the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2019MS01002), and the Inner Mongolia Innovative Research Team of China (Grant No. 3400102). |
Corresponding Authors:
Qian Zhao, Guo-Ping Zhao
E-mail: zhaoqianqm@163.com;zhaogp@uestc.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Qian Zhao(赵倩), Xin-Xin He(何鑫鑫), Francois-Jacques Morvan(李文瀚), Guo-Ping Zhao(赵国平), Zhu-Bai Li(李柱柏) Three- and two-dimensional calculations for the interface anisotropy dependence of magnetic properties of exchange-spring Nd2Fe14B/α-Fe multilayers with out-of-plane easy axes 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 037501
|
[1] |
Kneller E F and Hawig R 1991 IEEE Trans. Magn. 27 3588
|
[2] |
Liu W, Zhang Z D, Liu J P, Chen L J, He L D, Liu Y, Sun X K and Sellmyer D J 2002 Adv. Mater 14 1832
|
[3] |
Liu W, Li X Z, Liu J P, Sun X K, Chen C L, Skomski R, Zhang Z D and Sellmyer D J 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 104308
|
[4] |
Zhang Y, Kramer M J, Rong C B and Liu J P 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 032506
|
[5] |
Li Y Q, Yue M, Zuo J H, Zhang D T, Liu W Q, Zhang J X, Guo Z H and Li W 2013 IEEE Trans. Magn. 49 3391
|
[6] |
Skomski R 1994 J. Appl. Phys. 76 7059
|
[7] |
Victora R H and Shen X 2005 IEEE Trans. Magn. 41 2828
|
[8] |
Li Z B, Zhang M, Shen B G and Sunv J R 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 102405
|
[9] |
Zhang J, Takahashi Y K, Gopalan R and Hono K 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 122509
|
[10] |
Ryo H S, Hu L X, Kim J G and Yang Y L 2017 IEEE Trans. Magn. 53 7400207
|
[11] |
Poudyal N Y, Mohapatra J, Xing M Y, Kim C U and Liu J P 2018 IEEE Magn. Lett. 9 5501604
|
[12] |
Zhang W, Zhao G P, Yuan X H and Ye L N 2012 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 4231
|
[13] |
Yuan X H, Zhao G P, Yue M, Ye L N, Xia J, Zhang X C and Chang J 2013 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 343 245
|
[14] |
Weng X J, Shen L C, Tang H, Zhao G P, Xia J, Morvan F J and Zou J 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 475 352
|
[15] |
Asti G, Ghidini M, Pellicelli R, Pernechele C, Solzi M, Albertini F, Fabbrici S and Pareti L 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 094406
|
[16] |
Asti G, Solzi M, Ghidini M and Neri F M 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 174401
|
[17] |
Fan J P, Liang R Y, Bai Y H, Yang Y, Sun J, Jiang Y N, Wang F and Xu X H 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 119 233902
|
[18] |
Cui W B, Zheng S J, Liu W, Ma X L, Yang F, Yao Q, Zhao X G and Zhang Z D 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 104 053903
|
[19] |
Ghidini M, Asti G, Pelicelli R, Pernechele C and Solzi M 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater 316 159
|
[20] |
Cui W B, Takahashi Y K and Hono K 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 6530
|
[21] |
Zhao G P and Wang X L 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 012409
|
[22] |
Zhao G P, Zhao M G, Lim H S, Feng Y P and Ong C K 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 162513
|
[23] |
Si W J, Zhao G P, Ran N, Peng Y and F J 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 16212
|
[24] |
Gradmann U and Müller J 1968 Phys. Stat. Solidi 27 313
|
[25] |
Néel L 1954 J. Phys. Radium. 15 225
|
[26] |
Chappert C and Bruno P 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 5736
|
[27] |
Bruno P and Renard J P 1989 Appl. Phys. A 49 499
|
[28] |
Gradmann U, Korecki J and Waller G 1986 Appl. Phys. A 39 101
|
[29] |
Pellicelli R, Solzi M and Pernechele C 2014 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 115002
|
[30] |
Zhao Q, He X X, Morvan F J, Zhang X F, Zhao G P, Li Z B and Ma Q 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater 476 40
|
[31] |
Zhao Q, Chen J, Wang J Q, Zhang X F, Zhao G P and Ma Q 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 4286
|
[32] |
Zhao G P, Morvan F and Wan X L 2014 Rev. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 3 227
|
[33] |
Zhao G P, Zhao L, Shen L C, Zou J and Qui L 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 077505
|
[34] |
Johnson M T, Bloemen P J H, Broeder F J A D and Vries J J D 1996 Rep. Prog. Phys. 59 1409
|
[35] |
Fruchart O, Nozieres J P and Givord D 1997 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 165 508
|
[36] |
Lin M T, Shen J, Kuch W, Jenniches H, Klaua M, Schneider C M and Kirschner J 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 5886
|
[37] |
Zhao Q, He X X, Morvan F J, Zhang X F, Zhao G P, Li Z B, Li L F and Liu Y L 2020 J. Magn. Magn. Mater 495 165858
|
[38] |
Donahue M J and Porter D G 1999 OOMMF User's Guide Version 1.0. NISTIR 6376 NIST, Gaithersburg, M D
|
[39] |
Gilbert T L 2004 IEEE Trans. Magn. 40 3443
|
[40] |
Skomski R and Coey J M D 1993 Phys. Rev. B 48 15812
|
[41] |
Brown J W F 1945 Rev. Mod. Phys. 17 15
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|