|
|
Simulation of the influence of imperfections on dynamical decoupling of a superconducting qubit |
Ying-Shan Zhang(张颖珊), Jian-She Liu(刘建设), Chang-Hao Zhao(赵昌昊), Yong-Cheng He(何永成), Da Xu(徐达), Wei Chen(陈炜) |
1 Department of Microelectronics and Nanoelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2 Institute of Microelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3 Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
Abstract Dynamical decoupling is widely used in many quantum computing systems to combat decoherence. In a practical superconducting quantum system, imperfections can plague decoupling performance. In this work, imperfections in a superconducting qubit and its control system are modeled via modified Hamiltonian and collapse operator. A master equation simulation is carried out on the qubit under 1/f environment noise spectrum. The average dephasing rate of qubit is extracted to characterize the impact of different imperfections on the decoupling from dephasing. We find that the precision of pulse position, on-off ratio, and filtering effect are most critical. Bounded pulses have weaker impact, while variation in pulse width and qubit relaxation are insignificant. Consequently, alternative decoupling protocols, jitter mitigation, cascaded mixers, and pulse shaping can be conducive to the performance of decoupling. This work may assist the analysis and optimization of dynamical decoupling on noisy superconducting quantum systems.
|
Received: 15 January 2019
Revised: 16 March 2019
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
02.30.Yy
|
(Control theory)
|
|
03.65.Yz
|
(Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods)
|
|
42.50.Dv
|
(Quantum state engineering and measurements)
|
|
85.25.Cp
|
(Josephson devices)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CBA00304), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 60836001), and the Research Fund from Beijing Innovation Center for Future Chip. |
Corresponding Authors:
Wei Chen
E-mail: weichen@tsinghua.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Ying-Shan Zhang(张颖珊), Jian-She Liu(刘建设), Chang-Hao Zhao(赵昌昊), Yong-Cheng He(何永成), Da Xu(徐达), Wei Chen(陈炜) Simulation of the influence of imperfections on dynamical decoupling of a superconducting qubit 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 060201
|
[1] |
Shor P W 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 R2493
|
[2] |
Hu L, Ma Y W, Cai W Z, Mu X H, Xu Y, Wang W T, Wu Y K, Wang H Y, Song Y P, Zou C L, Girvin S M, Duan L M and Sun L Y 2018 arXiv: 1805.09072 [quant-ph]
|
[3] |
Lidar D A 2014 Quantum Information and Computation for Chemistry (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons) p. 295
|
[4] |
Zhang Z R, Li C Y, Wu C W, Dai H Y and Li C Z 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 042320
|
[5] |
Li J and Paraoanu G S 2012 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 338 012010
|
[6] |
Takita M, Córcoles AD, Magesan E, Abdo B, Brink M, Cross A, Chow J M and Gambetta J M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 210505
|
[7] |
Neill C, Roushan P, Kechedzhi K, et al. 2018 Science 360 195
|
[8] |
Ng H K, Lidar D A and Preskill J 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 012305
|
[9] |
Pan Y, Xi Z R and Cui W 2012 Chin. Sci. Bull. 57 2228
|
[10] |
Wang D M, Qian Y, Xu J B and Yu Y H 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 110304
|
[11] |
Guo Q J, Zheng S B, Wang J W, Song C, Zhang P F, Li K M, Liu W X, Deng H, Huang K Q, Zheng D N, Zhu X B, Wang H, Lu C Y and Pan J W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 130501
|
[12] |
Pokharel B, Anand N, Fortma B and Lidar D A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 220502
|
[13] |
Gustavsson S, Yan F, Bylander J, Yoshihara F, Nakamura Y, Orlando T P and Oliver W D 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 010502
|
[14] |
Bylander J, Gustavsson S, Yan F, Yoshihara F, Harrabi K, Fitch G, Cory D G, Nakamura Y, Tsai J S and Oliver W D 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 565
|
[15] |
Chu Y, Axline C, Wang C, Brecht T, Gao Y Y, Frunzio L and Schoelkopf R J 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 112601
|
[16] |
He L Z, Zhang M C, Wu C W, Xie Y, Wu W and Chen P X 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 120303
|
[17] |
Sakurai J J and Napolitano J 2014 Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Pearson) p. 185
|
[18] |
Beaudoin F 2016 “Understanding and Suppressing Dephasing Noise in Semiconductor Qubits,” Ph. D. Dissertation (McGill University)
|
[19] |
Paladino E, Galperin Y M, Falci G and Altshuler B L 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 361
|
[20] |
Lindblad G 1976 Commun. Math. Phys. 48 119
|
[21] |
Lidar D A and Brun T A 2013 Quantum Error Correction (Cambridge University Press) p. 8
|
[22] |
Viola L and Knill E 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 037901
|
[23] |
Carr H Y and Purcell E M 1954 Phys. Rev. 94 630
|
[24] |
Meiboom S and Gill D 1958 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 29 688
|
[25] |
Borneman T W, Hürlimann M D and Cory D G 2010 J. Magn. Reson. 207 220
|
[26] |
Uhrig G S 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 100504
|
[27] |
Souza A M, lvarez G A and Suter D 2012 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370 4748
|
[28] |
Johansson J R, Nation P D and Nori F 2012 Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 1760
|
[29] |
Chen Z J 2018 “Metrology of Quantum Control and Measurement in Superconducting Qubits”, Ph. D. Dissertation (University of California, Santa Barbara)
|
[30] |
Wocjan P 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 062317
|
[31] |
Khodjasteh K and Lidar D A 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 180501
|
[32] |
Pham L M, Bar-Gill N, Belthangady C, Le Sage D, Cappellaro P, Lukin M D, Yacoby A and Walsworth R L 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 045214
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|