INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effects of 3.7 T–24.5 T high magnetic fields on tumor-bearing mice |
Xiaofei Tian(田小飞)1,2, Ze Wang(王泽)1,3, Lei Zhang(张磊)1, Chuanying Xi(郗传英)1, Li Pi(皮雳)1, Ziping Qi(齐紫平)1, Qingyou Lu(陆轻铀)1,3,4, Xin Zhang(张欣)1,2 |
1 High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Key Laboratory of High Magnetic Field and Ion Beam Physical Biology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;
2 Institute of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China;
3 Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
4 Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics at Extreme Conditions, Hefei 230031, China |
|
|
Abstract Since high magnetic field (MF) intensity can improve the image quality and reduce magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition time, the field intensity of MRIs has continued to increase over the past few decades. Although MRIs in most current hospitals are 0.5 T-3 T, there are preclinical studies have been carried out using 9.4 T MRI, and engineers are also putting efforts on building MRIs with even higher MFs. However, the accompanied safety issue of high-field MRIs is an emergent question to address before their clinical applications. In the meantime, the static magnetic field (SMF) has been shown to inhibit tumor growth in previous studies. Here, we investigated both the safety issue and the anti-tumor potentials of 3.7 T-24.5 T SMFs on GIST-T1 gastrointestinal stromal tumor-bearing nude mice. We followed up the mice three weeks after their exposure to high SMF and found that none of the mice died or had severe organ damage, except for slightly decreased food intake, weight gain, and liver function. Moreover, the tumor growth was inhibited by 3.7 T-24.5 T SMFs (up to~54%). It is interesting that the effects are more dependent on MF gradient than intensities, and for the same gradient and intensity, mice responded differently to hypogravity and hypergravity conditions. Therefore, our study not only demonstrated the safeness of high SMFs up to 24.5 T on mice but also revealed their anti-tumor potentials in the future.
|
Received: 28 June 2018
Revised: 10 September 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
87.17.-d
|
(Cell processes)
|
|
87.19.xj
|
(Cancer)
|
|
87.50.C-
|
(Static and low-frequency electric and magnetic fields effects)
|
|
91.62.Uv
|
(Life in extreme environments)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2016YFA0400900 and 2017YFA0402903), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1532151 and 51627901), the Major/Innovative Program of Development Foundation of Hefei Center for Physical Science, Technology (Grant No. 2016FXCX004), Hefei Science Center, CAS (Grant No. 2016HSC-IU007), and the CASHIPS Director's Fund (Grant No. YZJJ201704) to Qingyou Lu and Xin Zhang. |
Corresponding Authors:
Qingyou Lu, Xin Zhang
E-mail: qxl@ustc.edu.cn;xinzhang@hmfl.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xiaofei Tian(田小飞), Ze Wang(王泽), Lei Zhang(张磊), Chuanying Xi(郗传英), Li Pi(皮雳), Ziping Qi(齐紫平), Qingyou Lu(陆轻铀), Xin Zhang(张欣) Effects of 3.7 T–24.5 T high magnetic fields on tumor-bearing mice 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 118703
|
[1] |
Wang J, Yang G and Liu F 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 058707(in Chinese)
|
[2] |
Schepkin V D, Bejarano F C, Morgan T, Gower-Winter S, Ozambela M and Levenson C W 2012 Magn. Reson. Med. 67 1159
|
[3] |
Schepkin V D 2016 NMR Biomedicine 29 175
|
[4] |
Nagel A M, Umathum R, Rosler M B, Ladd M E, Litvak I, Gor'kov P L, Brey W W and Schepkin V D 2016 NMR Biomedicine 29 759
|
[5] |
Shemesh N, Rosenberg J T, Dumez J N, Muniz J A, Grant S C and Frydman L 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4958
|
[6] |
Kotani H, Kawaguchi H, Shimoaka T, Iwasaka M, Ueno S, Ozawa H, Nakamura K and Hoshi K 2002 J. Bone Miner. Res. 17 1814
|
[7] |
Schiffer I B, Schreiber W G, Graf R, Schreiber E M, Jung D, Rose D M, Hehn M, Gebhard S, Sagemuller J, Spiess H W, Oesch F, Thelen M and Hengstler J G 2003 Bioelectromagnetics 24 241
|
[8] |
Nakahara T, Yaguchi H, Yoshida M and Miyakoshi J 2002 Radiology 224 817
|
[9] |
Zhao G P, Chen S P, Zhao Y, Zhu L Y, Huang P, Bao L Z, Wang J, Wang L, Wu L J, Wu Y J and Xu A 2010 Plasma Sci. Technol. 12 123
|
[10] |
Qian A R, Hu L F, Gao X, Zhang W, Di S M, Tian Z C, Yang P F, Yin D C, Weng Y Y and Shang P 2009 Bioelectromagnetics 30 545
|
[11] |
Pan H and Liu X 2004 Bioelectromagnetics 25 84
|
[12] |
Pan H 1996 Magn. Reso. Imaging 14 673
|
[13] |
Zhao G P, Chen S P, Wang L, Zhao Y, Wang J, Wang X F, Zhang W W, Wu R Q, Wu L J, Wu Y J and Xu A 2011 Bioelectromagnetics 32 94
|
[14] |
Eguchi Y, Ogiue-Ikeda M and Ueno S 2003 Neurosci. Lett. 351 130
|
[15] |
Denegre J M, Valles J M, Lin K, Jordan W B and Mowry K L 1998 P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 14729
|
[16] |
Zhang L, Hou Y B, Li Z Y, Ji X M, Wang Z, Wang H Z, Tian X F, Yu F Z, Yang Z Y, Pi L, Mitchison T J, Lu Q Y and Zhang X 2017 Elife 6 e22911
|
[17] |
Tian X F and Zhang X 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 148701(in Chinese)
|
[18] |
Lu G, Liu M L, Li L Y and Ye C H 2002 Chin. Phys. Lett. 19 1385
|
[19] |
Qian A R, Gao X, Zhang W, Li J B, Wang Y, Di S M, Hu L F and Shang P 2013 Plos One 8
|
[20] |
Wang D M, Wang Z, Zhang L, Li Z Y, Tian X F, Fang J, Lu Q Y and Zhang X 2018 Bioelectromagnetics
|
[21] |
Higashi T, Yamagishi A, Takeuchi T, Kawaguchi N, Sagawa S, Onishi S and Date M 1993 Blood 82 1328
|
[22] |
Higashi T, Sagawa S, Ashida N and Takeuchi T 1996 Bioelectromagnetics 17 335
|
[23] |
Emura R, Ashida N, Higashi T and Takeuchi T 2001 Bioelectromagnetics 22 60
|
[24] |
Emura R, Takeuchi T, Nakaoka Y and Higashi T 2003 Bioelectromagnetics 24 347
|
[25] |
Jung I, Powers T R, Valles J M and Jr 2014 Biophys. J. 106 106
|
[26] |
Guevorkian K and Valles J M 2006 P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 13051
|
[27] |
Budinger T F, Bird M D, Frydman L, Long J R, Mareci T H, Rooney W D, Rosen B, Schenck J F, Schepkin V D, Sherry A D, Sodickson D K, Springer C S, Thulborn K R, Ugurbil K and Wald L L 2016 Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 29 617
|
[28] |
Budinger T F and Bird M D 2018 Neuroimage 168 509
|
[29] |
Pais-Roldan P, Singh A P, Schulz H and Yu X 2016 Sci. Rep-Uk 6 24151
|
[30] |
Luo Y, Ji X, Liu J, Li Z, Wang W, Chen W, Wang J, Liu Q and Zhang X 2016 Bioelectrochemistry 109 31
|
[31] |
Strelczyk D, Eichhorn M E, Luedemann S, Brix G, Dellian M, Berghaus A and Strieth S 2009 Cancer Biology & Therapy 8 1756
|
[32] |
Zhang L, Wang J H, Wang H L, Wang W C, Li Z Y, Liu J J, Yang X X, Ji X M, Luo Y, Hu C, Hou Y B, He Q Q, Fang J, Wang J F, Liu Q S, Li G H, Lu Q Y and Zhang X 2016 Oncotarget 7 41527
|
[33] |
Zhang L, Ji X M, Yang X X and Zhang X 2017 Oncotarget 8 13126
|
[34] |
Sun Y L, Chen Z H, Chen X H, Yin C, Li D J, Ma X L, Zhao F, Zhang G, Shang P and Qian A R 2015 IEEE T. Bio-Med. Eng. 62 900
|
[35] |
Herranz R, Anken R, Boonstra J, Braun M, Christianen P C, de Geest M, Hauslage J, Hilbig R, Hill R J, Lebert M, Medina F J, Vagt N, Ullrich O, van Loon J J and Hemmersbach R 2013 Astrobiology 13 1
|
[36] |
Hammer B E, Kidder L S, Williams P C and Xu W W 2009 Microgravity Sci. Tec. 21 311
|
[37] |
Tsuji Y, Nakagawa M and Suzuki Y 1996 Ind. Health 34 347
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|