|
|
Predictive control of a chaotic permanent magnet synchronous generator in a wind turbine system |
Manal Messadia, Adel Mellita, Karim Kemihb, Malek Ghanesc |
a LRE Laboratory, Jijel University, BP 98 ouled Aissa Jijel, Algeria; b L2EI laboratory, Jijel University, BP 98 ouled Aissa Jijel, Algeria; c ECS-ENSEA, cergy-pontoise, France, 6, avenue du Ponceau 95014, Cergy-Pontoise Cedex |
|
|
Abstract This paper investigates how to address the chaos problem in a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) in a wind turbine system. Predictive control approach is proposed to suppress chaotic behavior and make operating stable; the advantage of this method is that it can only be applied to one state of the wind turbine system. The use of the genetic algorithms to estimate the optimal parameter values of the wind turbine leads to maximization of the power generation. Moreover, some simulation results are included to visualize the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method.
|
Received: 14 June 2014
Revised: 27 August 2014
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
05.45.Gg
|
(Control of chaos, applications of chaos)
|
|
05.45.-a
|
(Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)
|
|
02.30.Yy
|
(Control theory)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the CMEP-TASSILI Project (Grant No. 14MDU920). |
Corresponding Authors:
Manal Messadi
E-mail: manal.messadi@ensea.fr
|
Cite this article:
Manal Messadi, Adel Mellit, Karim Kemih, Malek Ghanes Predictive control of a chaotic permanent magnet synchronous generator in a wind turbine system 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 010502
|
[1] |
Ashuri T, Zaaijer M B, Martins J R R A, van Bussel G J W and van Kuik G A M 2014 Renew Energ. 68 893
|
[2] |
Yan B H and Wang J Z 2010 Nonlinear Dyn. 61 819
|
[3] |
Rosen A and Sheinman Y J 1994 Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 51 287
|
[4] |
Jimenez F, Gomez-Lazaro E, Fuentes J, Molina-Garcia A and Vigueras-Rodriguez A 2013 Renew Energ. 57 27
|
[5] |
Zhu J, Ruan L and Wang L 2011 Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), August 20-23 2011, Beijing, China, p. 1
|
[6] |
Carranza O, Figueres E, Garcera G and Gonzalez-Medina R 2013 Appl. Energ. 103 522
|
[7] |
Wu F, Zhang X P and Ju P 2009 Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. 79 1661
|
[8] |
Naas B, Nezli L L, Nass B, Mahmoudi M O and Elbar M 2012 Proceedings of the International Conference on Technologies and Materials for Renewable Energy, Environment and Sustainability, February 16-18,2012, Beirut, Lebanon, p. 521
|
[9] |
Hemati N 1994 IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I 41 40
|
[10] |
Li Z, Park J B, Joo Y H, Zhang B and Chen G 2002 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 49 383
|
[11] |
Jing Z, Yu C and Chen G R 2004 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 22 831
|
[12] |
Choi H H and Jung J W 2012 Nonlinear Dyn. 67 1717
|
[13] |
Yu J, Yu H, Chen B, Gao J and Qin Y 2012 Nonlinear Dyn. 70 1879
|
[14] |
Maeng G and Choi H H 2013 Nonlinear Dyn. 74 571
|
[15] |
Han H C 2012 Nonlinear Dyn. 69 1311
|
[16] |
Yu J, Chen B and Yu H 2012 Nonlinear Dyn. 69 1479
|
[17] |
Yu J, Shi P, Dong W, Chen B and Lin C 2014 IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. Lear.
|
[18] |
Yu J, Ma Y, Chen B and Yu H 2011 Int. J. Innov. Comput. I 7 1589
|
[19] |
Yu J, Yu H, Chen B, Gao J and Qin Y 2012 Nonlinear Dyn. 70 1879
|
[20] |
Ott E, Grebogi C and Yorke J A 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 1196
|
[21] |
Jang M 2002 Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 12 1437
|
[22] |
Cao Y J 2008 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 36 460
|
[23] |
Yu Y and Zhang S 2003 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 15 897
|
[24] |
LI H Y and Hu Y A 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 120508
|
[25] |
Kemih K, Benslama M, Filali S, Liu W Y and Baudrand H 2007 Int. J. Innov. Comput. I 3 1301
|
[26] |
Kemih K, Filali S, Benslama M and Kimouche M 2006 Int. J. Innov. Comput. I 2 331
|
[27] |
Kemih K and Liu W Y 2007 ICIC-EL 1 39
|
[30] |
Boukabou A, Chebbah A and Mansouri N 2008 Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 18 587
|
[31] |
Boukabou A, Sayoud B, Boumaizaa H and Mansouri N 2009 Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 19 3813
|
[32] |
Ushio T and Yamamoto T 1999 Phys. Lett. A 264 30
|
[28] |
Yang D D 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 010504
|
[29] |
Zhang J B, Ma Z and Zhang G 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 010507
|
[33] |
Boukhezzar B and Siguerdidjane H 2009 Energ. Convers. Manage. 50 885
|
[34] |
Guo Y, Zeng P, Zhu J, Li L, Deng W and Blaabjerg F 2011 Proceedings of the International Conference on Electric and Electronics (EEIC 2011), June 20-22 2011, Nanchang, China, p. 809
|
[35] |
Hou Y Y 2012 Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012 650863
|
[36] |
Goldberg E D 1989 Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning (Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional)
|
[37] |
Kalfat A 2011 Etude et Optimisation de la Puissance Issue de la Turbine dans les Eoliennes a Vitesse Variable (Master. Dissertation) (Jijel: University of Jijel)
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|