INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
An electromagnetic view of relay time in propagation of neural signals |
Jing-Jing Xu(徐晶晶)1,2,†, San-Jin Xu(徐三津)1, Fan Wang(王帆)1, and Sheng-Yong Xu(许胜勇)2,‡ |
1 School of Microelectronics, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250100, China; 2 Department of Electronics, School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China |
|
|
Abstract We review the experimental and computational data about the propagation of neural signals in myelinated axons in mice, cats, rabbits, and frogs published in the past five decades. In contrast to the natural assumption that neural signals occur one by one in time and in space, we figure out that neural signals are highly overlapped in time between neighboring nodes. This phenomenon was occasionally illustrated in some early reports, but seemed to have been overlooked for some time. The shift in time between two successive neural signals from neighboring nodes, defined as relay time τ , was calculated to be only 16.3 μ s-87.0 μ s, i.e., 0.8%-4.4% of the average duration of an action potential peak (roughly 2 ms). We present a clearer picture of the exact physical process about how the information transmits along a myelinated axon, rather than a whole action potential peak, what is transmitted is only a rising electric field caused by transmembrane ion flows. Here in the paper, τ represents the waiting time until the neighboring node senses an attenuated electric field reaching the threshold to trigger the open state. The mechanisms addressed in this work have the potential to be universal, and may hold clues to revealing the exact triggering processes of voltage-gated ion channels and various brain functions.
|
Received: 03 July 2020
Revised: 09 September 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 14 October 2020
|
PACS:
|
87.19.lb
|
(Action potential propagation and axons)
|
|
87.19.lq
|
(Neuronal wave propagation)
|
|
87.19.rp
|
(Impulse propagation)
|
|
87.19.L-
|
(Neuroscience)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFA0701302 and 2016YFA0200802) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University, China (Grant No. 2018GN030). |
Corresponding Authors:
†Corresponding author. E-mail: xujj@sdu.edu.cn ‡Corresponding author. E-mail: xusy@pku.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Jing-Jing Xu(徐晶晶), San-Jin Xu(徐三津), Fan Wang(王帆), and Sheng-Yong Xu(许胜勇) An electromagnetic view of relay time in propagation of neural signals 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 028701
|
1 Hameroff S and Penrose R 2014 Phys. Life. Rev. 11 39 2 Georgiev D and Dimchev 2003 Social Science Electronic Publishing 3 Gonzalez-Perez A, Budvytyte R, Mosgaard L D, Nissen S R and Heimburg T 2014 Phys. Rev. X 4 4 Heimburg T and Jackson A D 2005 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 9790 5 Xu J, Xu Y, Sun W, Li M and Xu S 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 13824 6 Xu S, Xu J and Yang F 2016 Neuroscience & Biomedical Engineering 4 230 7 Xue J and Xu S 2012 Quantitative Biology 8 Hartline D K and Colman D R 2007 Curr. Biol. 17 29 9 Hodgkin A L and Huxley A F 1952 J. Physiol. 117 500 10 Villapecellin-Cid M M, Rao L and Reina-Tosina J 2003 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 25 1950 11 Heimburg T and Jackson A D 2007 Biophys. Rev. Lett. 2 57 12 Lautrup B, Appali R, Jackson A D and Heimburg T 2011 Eur. Phys. J. 34 13 Bulai P M M, Pavel G, Denisov A A, Pitlik T N and Cherenkevich S N 2012 Eur. Biophys. J. 41 319 14 Quinn S J, Kifor O, Trivedi S, Diaz R, Vassilev P and Brown E 1998 J. Biol. Chem. 273 19579 15 Liu G, Chang C, Qiao Z, Wu K, Zhu Z, Cui G, Peng W, Tang Y, Li J and Fan C 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1807862 16 Zangari A, Micheli D, Galeazzi R and Tozzi A 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 539 17 Sepehri R M, Cohen L B, Braubach O and Baker B J 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 6911 18 Volkov AG 2019 Bioelectrochemistry 125 25 19 Nguyen C T, Kurenda A, Stolz S, Cételat A and Farmer E E 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 10178 20 Eckert R 1972 Science 176 473 21 Sun W Q, Yang Y and Xu S Y. 2011 Key Engineering Materials 483 755 22 Paintal A S 1966 J. Physiol-London 184 791 23 Paintal A S 1967 J. Physiol. 193 523 24 Marks W B and Loeb G E 1976 Biophys. J. 16 655 25 Simpson A H, Gillingwater T H, Anderson, H, Cottrell D, Sherman D L, Ribchester R R and Brophy P J 2013 J. Neurosci. 33 4536 26 Etxeberria A, Hokanson K C, Dao D Q, Mayoral S R, Mei F, Redmond S A, Ullian E M and Chan J R 2016 J. Neurosci. 36 6937 27 Villalòn E, Barry D M, Byers N, Frizzi K and Garcia M L 2018 Exp. Neurol. 306 158 28 Frankenhaeuser B 1952 J. Physiol. 118 107 29 Rasminsky M and Sears T A 1972 J. Physiol-London 227 323 30 Koles Z J and Rasminsky M 1972 J. Physiol. 227 351 31 Akaishi T 2017 Front. Physiol. 8 798 32 Court F A, Sherman D L, Pratt T, Garry E M, Ribchester R R, Cottrell D F, Fleetwood-Walker S M and Brophy P J 2004 Nature 431 191 33 Bear M F, Connors B W and Paradiso M A2007 \em Neuroscience: Exploring the brain, 3rd edn. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) 34 Hua H and Jonas P 2014 Nat. Neurosci. 17 686 35 Friede R L 2017 J. Neuropath. Exp. Neur. 76 258 36 Rushton W A H 1951 J. Physiol. 115 101 37 Waxman S G and Ritchie J M 1993 Ann. Neurol. 33 121 38 Brill M H, Waxman S G, Moore J W and Joyner R W 1977 J. Neurol. Neurosur. Ps. 40 769 39 Arbuthnott E R, Boyd I A and Kalu K U 1980 J. Physiol. 308 125 40 Prister\'a A, Baker M D and Okuse K 2012 Plos One 7 673 41 Jahnsen H and Llinas R R 1984 J. Physiol. 349 205 42 Black J A, Foster R E and Waxman S G 1981 J. Neurocytol. 10 981 43 Prister\'a A and Okuse K 2012 Neuroscientist A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology Neurology & Psychiatry 18 70 44 Neishabouri A and Faisal A A 2014 Front. Neuroanat. 8 109 45 Johnston W L, Dyer J R, Castellucci V F and Dunn R J 1996 J. Neurosci. 16 1730 46 Zeng S and Tang Y 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 021917 47 Hess A and Young J Z 1952 P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 140 301 48 Matsumoto G and Tasaki I 1977 Biophys. J. 20 1 49 Rietz R 1996 Jama-J. Am. Med. Assoc. 275 157 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|