INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Degradation of the transconductance of gate-modulated generation current in nMOSFET |
Chen Hai-Feng (陈海峰), Guo Li-Xin (过立新), Du Hui-Min (杜慧敏 ) |
School of Electronic Engineering, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, China |
|
|
Abstract The degradation of transconductance (G) of gate-modulated generation current IGD in LDD nMOSFET is investigated. The G curve shifts rightward under the single electron-injection-stress (EIS). The trapped electrons located in the gate oxide over the LDD region (QL) makes the effective drain voltage minish. Accordingly, the G peak in depletion (GMD) and that in weak inversion (GMW) decrease. It is found that Δ GMD and Δ GMW each have a linear relationship with the n-th power of stress time (tn) in dual-log coordinate: Δ GMD ∝ tn, Δ GMD ∝ tn (n=0.25). During the alternate stress, the injected holes neutralize QL induced by the previous EIS. This neutralization makes the effective VD restore to the initial value and then the IGD peak recovers completely. Yet the threshold voltage recovery is incomplete due to the trapped electron located over the channel (QC). As a result, GMW only recovers to the circa 50% of the initial value after the hole-injection-stress (HIS). Instead, GMD is almost recovered. The relevant mechanisms are given in detail.
|
Received: 15 January 2012
Revised: 27 April 2012
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
85.30.De
|
(Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling)
|
|
85.30.Tv
|
(Field effect devices)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Shaanxi Provincial Research Project of Education Department, China (Grant No. 11JK0902) and the Xi'an Municipal Applied Materials Innovation Fund, China (Grant No. XA-AM-201012). |
Corresponding Authors:
Chen Hai-Feng
E-mail: chenhaifeng@xupt.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Chen Hai-Feng (陈海峰), Guo Li-Xin (过立新), Du Hui-Min (杜慧敏 ) Degradation of the transconductance of gate-modulated generation current in nMOSFET 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 088501
|
[1] |
Pan J 2009 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 56 1350
|
[2] |
Rusu A, Badila M and Rusu A 2011 IEEE Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures April 4-7, 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands p. 136
|
[3] |
Chang Y K, You S W, Juan P C, Wang M T and Lee Y M 2009 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 30 161
|
[4] |
Giebel T and Goser K 1989 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 10 76
|
[5] |
Czerwinski A, Simoen E, Poyai A, Claeys C and Ohyama H 2003 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 278
|
[6] |
Randriamihaja Y M, Bravaix A, Huard V, Rideau D, Rafik M and Roy D 2010 IRW Final Report October 17-21, 2010, Crolles, France, p. 61
|
[7] |
Lee G D, Chung S S, Mao A Y, Lin W M, Yang C W and Hsieh Y S 2006 Proceedings of 13rd IPFA, July 3-7, Singapore, p. 37
|
[8] |
Felix J A, Shaneyfelt M R, Dodd P E, Draper B L, Schwank J R and Dalton S M 2005 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52 2378
|
[9] |
Rao P R, Wang X Y and Theuwissen A J 2008 Solid-State Electronics 52 1407
|
[10] |
Goiffon V, Magnan P, Saint-pe O, Bernard F and Rolland G 2008 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 55 3439
|
[11] |
Goifon V, Virmontois C, Magnan P, Girard S and Paillet P 2010 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57 3087
|
[12] |
Shi M and Wu G Y 2008 Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University Press) p. 33
|
[13] |
Chen Y Y, Hsieh C and Chiu F G 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 033501
|
[14] |
Chen J J, Chen S M, Liang B, He Y B, Chu Y Q and Deng K F 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 114220
|
[15] |
Eiji T, Yang C Y and Akemi M 1995 Hot-Carrier Effects in MOS Devices (San Diego: Academic Press) p. 82
|
[16] |
Chen H F, Hao Y and Ma X H 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 1662 (in Chinese)
|
[17] |
Ma X H, Cao Y R, Gao H X, Chen H F and Hao Y 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 152107
|
[18] |
Han J W, Moon D I, Kim D H and Yang Choi Y K 2009 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 30 1108
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|