CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effect of diode size and series resistance on barrier height and ideality factor in nearly ideal Au/n type-GaAs micro Schottky contact diodes |
M. A. Yeganeha)b)†,Sh. Rahmatallahpurb), A. Nozadb), and R. K. Mamedova) |
a Faculty of Physics, Baku State University, Academic Zahid X?lilov K???esi-23, AZ 1148, Iran; b Material Research School, POB 55515196, Binab, Iran |
|
|
Abstract Small high-quality Au/n type-GaAs Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs) with low reverse leakage current are produced using lithography. Their effective barrier heights (BHs) and ideality factors from current–voltage (I–V) characteristics are measured by a Pico ampere meter and home-built I–V instrument. In spite of the identical preparation of the diodes there is a diode-to-diode variation in ideality factor and barrier height parameters. Measurement of topology of a surface of a thin metal film with atomic force microscope (AFM) shows that Au-n type-GaAS SD consists of a set of parallel-connected micro and nanocontacts diodes with sizes approximately in a range of 100–200 nm. Between barrier height and ideality factor there is an inversely proportional dependency. With the diameter of contact increasing from 5 μm up to 200 μm, the barrier height increases from 0.833 up to 0.933 eV and its ideality factor decreases from 1.11 down to 1.006. These dependencies show the reduction of the contribution of the peripheral current with the diameter of contact increasing. We find the effect of series resistance on barrier height and ideality factor.
|
Received: 31 March 2010
Revised: 29 April 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
68.37.Ps
|
(Atomic force microscopy (AFM))
|
|
68.55.-a
|
(Thin film structure and morphology)
|
|
73.30.+y
|
(Surface double layers, Schottky barriers, and work functions)
|
|
73.40.Ns
|
(Metal-nonmetal contacts)
|
|
85.30.Hi
|
(Surface barrier, boundary, and point contact devices)
|
|
85.40.Hp
|
(Lithography, masks and pattern transfer)
|
|
Cite this article:
M. A. Yeganeh,Sh. Rahmatallahpur, A. Nozad, and R. K. Mamedov Effect of diode size and series resistance on barrier height and ideality factor in nearly ideal Au/n type-GaAs micro Schottky contact diodes 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 107207
|
[1] |
Sonmezoglu S, Bayansal F, Guven Cankaya and Gaziosmanpasa 2010 wxPhysica B405 287
|
[2] |
Abdul Manaf Hashim, Seiya Kasai and Hideki Hasegawa 2008 wxSuperlattices and Microstructures44 754
|
[3] |
Mamedov R K 2003 Contacts Metal--Semiconductor with Electrical Spots Field (Baku: BSU) p. 231
|
[4] |
Semendy F, Singh S, Litz M, Wijewarnasuriya P, Blaine K and Dhar N 2010 wxSolid-State Electronics54 1
|
[5] |
Alperovich V L, Tereshchenko O E, Rudaya N S, Sheglov D V, Latyshev A V and Terekhov A S 2004 wxAppl. Surf. Sci.235 249
|
[6] |
Mehmet Ali Ebeoglu 2008 wxPhysica B403 61
|
[7] |
Karatas S and Turut A 2006 wxPhysica B381 199
|
[8] |
Zhang D H 1999 wxMater. Sci. Eng. B60 189
|
[9] |
Keiji Maeda 2006 wxAppl. Surf. Sci.252 5659
|
[10] |
Schottky W 1938 wxNaturwissenchaften26 843
|
[11] |
Nakamura M, Yanagisawa H, Kuratani S, Iizuka M and Kudo K 2003 wxThin Solid Films438--439 360
|
[12] |
Bardeen J 1947 wxPhys. Rev.71 717
|
[13] |
Song Y P, Van Meirhaeghe R L, Lauere W H and Cardon F 1986 wxSolid-State Electron.29 633
|
[14] |
Tung T 1992 wxPhys. Rev. B45 13509
|
[15] |
Sullivan J P, Tung R T, Pinto M R and Graham W R 1991 wxJ. Appl. Phys.70 7403
|
[16] |
Tung R T 2001 wxMater. Sci. Eng.35 1
|
[17] |
Tung R T 1993 Contacts to Semiconductors ed. Brilson L J (New Jersey: Noyes Publishers)
|
[18] |
Werner J H and Guttler H H 1991 wxJ. Appl. Phys.69 1522
|
[19] |
Biber M, Cakar M and Turut A 2001 wxJ. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.12 575
|
[20] |
Monch W 1988 wxPhys. Rev. B37 7129
|
[21] |
Monch W 1999 wxJ. Vac. Sci. Technol. B17 1867
|
[22] |
Schmitsdorf R F, Kampen T U and Monch W 1997 wxJ. Vac. Sci. Technol. B15 1221
|
[23] |
Savas Sonmezoglu, Sevilay Senkul, Recep Tas, Guven Cankaya and Muzaffer Can 2010 Solid State Sciences, in Press online 10 February 2010
|
[24] |
Detavernier C, Van Meirhaeghe R L, Donaton R, Maex K and Cardon F 1998 wxJ. Appl. Phys.84 3226
|
[25] |
Somenath Roy, Chacko Jacob and Sukumar Basu 2004 wxSolid State Sciences6 377
|
[26] |
Yao Z, Postma H W C, Balents L and Dekker C 1999 wxNature (London)402 273
|
[27] |
Cui Y and Lieber C M 2001 wxScience291 851
|
[28] |
Biswajit Ghosh, Madhumita Das, Pushan Banerjee and Subrata Das 2009 wxSolid State Sci.11 461
|
[29] |
Hasunuma R, Komeda T and Tokumoto H 1998 wxAppl. Surf. Sci.130--132 84
|
[30] |
Bell L D and Kaiser W J 1988 wxPhys. Rev. Lett.61 2368
|
[31] |
Tivarus C, Pelz J P, Hudait M K and Ringel S A 2005 wxAppl. Phys. Lett.87 182105
|
[32] |
Giannazzo F, Roccaforte F and Raineri V 2007 wxMicroelectronic Engineering84 450
|
[33] |
Hasegawa H, Sato T and Kasai S 2000 wxAppl. Surf. Sci.166 92
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|