|
Special Issue:
SPECIAL TOPIC — Structures and properties of materials under high pressure
|
| SPECIAL TOPIC — Structures and properties of materials under high pressure |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Optical properties of five-layer and ten-layer CrI3 films under high pressure: Insights from in situ Raman and UV-visible spectroscopy |
| Zhipeng Yan(闫志鹏)1,2,†, Xiaodong Yao(姚晓东)3, Guangyang Dai(代光阳)2,4, Chenkai Li(李辰恺)3, Qunfei Zheng(郑群飞)3, Jun Han(韩军)3, Ying Liu(刘影)3, and Xiaowei Sun(孙小伟)1,‡ |
1 School of Mathematics and Physics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2 Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China;
3 Department of Physics, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China;
4 Institute of Quantum Materials and Physics, Henan Academy of Sciences, Zhengzhou 450046, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnetic semiconductor CrI$_{3}$ provides an ideal platform for exploring the interplay among structural, electronic and magnetic degrees of freedom. In this work, we systematically investigate the thickness-dependent optical properties of five-layer and ten-layer CrI$_{3}$ under hydrostatic pressure up to 27.9 GPa by in situ Raman and UV-visible absorption spectroscopy. All A$_{\rm g}$ Raman modes exhibit a continuous blueshift with increasing pressure. The low-frequency modes ($\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{g}}^{{1}}$ - $\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{g}}^{{3}}$) are mainly associated with enhanced interlayer coupling, whereas the high-frequency modes ($\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{g}}^{{4}}$ - $\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{g}}^{{6}}$) reflect the suppression of surface vibrations. The Raman modes disappear at approximately 4.9 GPa for the five-layer sample and 11.2 GPa for the ten-layer sample, indicating a stronger strain sensitivity in thinner CrI$_{3}$. Optical absorption measurements show a pronounced redshift of the absorption edge, accompanied by bandgap narrowing from 2.26 eV to 1.26 eV in five-layer CrI$_{3}$. At comparable pressures, the five-layer sample consistently exhibits a wider bandgap than the ten-layer one, which is attributed to quantum confinement effects and reduced interlayer hybridization. Above 12.7 GPa, the bandgap reduction becomes less pronounced, probably due to enhanced Cr 3d/I 5p orbital overlap and strengthened superexchange interactions. These results reveal a clear layer-dependent structure-electronic coupling in CrI$_{3}$ under compression and provide useful insights into pressure modulation of van der Waals magnetic semiconductors.
|
Received: 06 November 2025
Revised: 14 January 2026
Accepted manuscript online: 03 February 2026
|
|
PACS:
|
78.30.-j
|
(Infrared and Raman spectra)
|
| |
63.22.-m
|
(Phonons or vibrational states in low-dimensional structures and nanoscale materials)
|
| |
78.20.-e
|
(Optical properties of bulk materials and thin films)
|
| |
78.66.-w
|
(Optical properties of specific thin films)
|
|
| Fund: This work was mainly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12274193) and Natural Science Foundation of Henan (Grant No. 242300420640). We also thank the support from Tianyou Youth Talent Lift Program of Lanzhou Jiaotong University and the Young Scholars Science Foundation of Lanzhou Jiaotong University (Grant No. 2025027). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhipeng Yan, Xiaowei Sun
E-mail: zp.yan@lzjtu.edu.cn;sunxw_lzjtu@yeah.net
|
Cite this article:
Zhipeng Yan(闫志鹏), Xiaodong Yao(姚晓东), Guangyang Dai(代光阳), Chenkai Li(李辰恺), Qunfei Zheng(郑群飞), Jun Han(韩军), Ying Liu(刘影), and Xiaowei Sun(孙小伟) Optical properties of five-layer and ten-layer CrI3 films under high pressure: Insights from in situ Raman and UV-visible spectroscopy 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 057801
|
[1] Huang B, Clark G, Navarro-Moratalla E, Klein D R, Cheng R, et al 2017 Nature 546 270
[2] Lado J L and Fernández-Rossier J 2017 2D Mater. 4 035002
[3] Wang X, Wang C, Wang Y, Ye C, Rahman A, et al 2025 ACS Nano 19 8108
[4] Gong C, Li L, Li Z, Ji H, Stern A, et al 2017 Nature 546 265
[5] Deng Y, Yu Y, Song Y, Zhang J, Wang N Z, et al 2018 Nature 563 94
[6] Deng Y, Yu Y, Shi M Z, Guo Z, Xu Z, et al 2020 Science 367 895
[7] Xiao F and Tong Q 2022 Nano Lett. 22 3946
[8] Webster L and Yan J A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 144411
[9] Song T, Fei Z, Yankowitz M, Lin Z, Jiang Q, et al 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1298
[10] Sivadas N, Okamoto S, Xu X, Fennie C J and Xiao D 2018 Nano Lett. 18 7658
[11] Wu Z, Yu J and Yuan S 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 7750
[12] McGuire M A, Dixit H, Cooper V R and Sales B C 2015 Chemistry of Materials 27 612
[13] Tomarchio L, Macis S, Mosesso L, Nguyen L T, Grilli A, et al 2021 Sci. Rep. 11 23405
[14] Dillon J F, Jr. and Olson C E 1965 J. Appl. Phys. 36 1259
[15] Meseguer-Sánchez J, Popescu C, García-Muñoz J L, Luetkens H, Taniashvili G, et al 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 6265
[16] Li T, Jiang S, Sivadas N,Wang Z, Xu Y, et al 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1303
[17] Jiang Y, Guo Y, Yan X, Zeng H, Lin L, et al. 2021 Nanomaterials 11 2509
[18] Jiang S, Li L,Wang Z, Mak K F and Shan J 2018 Nature Nanotechnology 13 549
[19] Mermin N D and Wagner H 1966 Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 1133
[20] Hohenberg P C 1967 Phys. Rev. 158 383
[21] Burch K S, Mandrus D and Park J G 2018 Nature 563 47
[22] Ghosh A, Singh D, Aramaki T, Mu Q, Borisov V, et al. 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 L081104
[23] Mondal S, Kannan M, Das M, Govindaraj L, Singha R, et al 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 180407
[24] Chen L, Chung J-H, Gao B, Chen T, Stone M B, et al 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 041028
[25] Chen L, Chung J-H, Stone M B, Kolesnikov A I, Winn B, et al 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11 031047
[26] Guo X, Jin W, Ye Z, Ye G, Xie H, et al 2021 ACS Nano 15 10444
[27] Liu Z, Guo Y, Chen Z, Gong T, Li Y, et al. 2022 Nanophotonics 11 4409
[28] Zhang Z, You J Y, Gu B and Su G 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 174433
[29] Subhan F, Ali L, Aman R, Chen A, Peng B, et al 2025 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 27 397
[30] León A M, González JW, Mejía-López J, Crasto de Lima F and Suárez Morell E 2020 2D Mater. 7 035008
[31] Jayaraman A 1983 Rev. Mod. Phys. 55 65
[32] Mao H K, Xu J and Bell P M 1986 Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 91 4673
[33] Ubrig N, Wang Z, Teyssier J, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, et al 2020 2D Mater. 7 015007
[34] Heath J J, Costa M, Buongiorno-Nardelli M and Kuroda M A 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 195439
[35] Yu T, Liu R, Mao H, Ma X, Wang G, et al 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 165127
[36] Wang Y, An J, Ye C, Wang X, Mai D, et al 2025 Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 046303 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
