1 School of New Energy, Longdong University, Qingyang 745000, China; 2 School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China
Abstract In order to enhance the ultrasonic degradation rate of organic solutions, a metal plate is placed at the water-air interface of the ultrasonic cleaning tank. Initially, the distribution of the acoustic field in the ultrasonic water tank was calculated using the simulation software COMSOL. The simulation results demonstrated that the utilization of the metal plate can eliminate the standing-wave acoustic field to a certain extent. Subsequently, the pixel method was selected for a quantitative comparison of the cavitation area in the flume with and without the metal plate. The results demonstrated that, under specific conditions, the area of ultrasonic cavitation in the water tank can be expanded using a metal plate. Thereafter, an acoustic degradation experiment was designed to confirm the feasibility of the simulation method. Furthermore, the impacts of the amplitude of the incident ultrasonic pressure, frequency, and the height of the liquid level in the water tank on the cavitation area were investigated.
(Transduction; acoustical devices for the generation and reproduction of sound)
Fund: Project supported by the Doctoral Fund Program of Longdong University (Grant No. XYBYZK2219), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12274277), the Science and Technology Project of Gansu Province of China (Grant No. 21JR11RM046), and Young Doctor Fund of Gansu Education Department (Grant No. 2022QB-171).
Corresponding Authors:
Jin-He Liu
E-mail: qy1451785880@163.com
Cite this article:
Jin-He Liu(刘金河), Zhuang-Zhi Shen(沈壮志), Peng-Fei Cao(曹鹏飞), Jian-Feng Li(李建锋), and Xiao-Qiang Bai(白小强) Effect of metal plate on ultrasonic cavitation field distribution 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 054302
[1] Shen Z H 2005 China Biogas 23 161 (in Chinese) [2] Xue S 2023 Sustainable Mining and Metallurgy 39 63 [3] Kiso Y, Sugiura Y, Kitao T and Nishimura K 2001 J. Membr. Sci. 192 1 [4] Wang Y, Rao G Y and Hu J Y 2011 Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply 11 711 [5] Alexander J T, Hai F I and Al-Aboud T M 2012 J. Environ. Manage 111 195 [6] Sala M and Gutiérrez-Bouzán M C 2012 Int. J. Photoenergy 2012 1 [7] Zhang M, Shi Q, Song X,Wang H and Bian Z 2019 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26 10457 [8] Ahmady-Asbchin S, Andres Y, Gerente C and Le Cloirec P 2009 Environ. Technol 30 755 [9] Al-Gheethi A A, Lalung J, Noman E A, Bala J and Norli I 2015 Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 17 2101 [10] Von Sonntag C 2008 Water Sci. Technol. 58 1015 [11] Vilar V J, Malato S and Dionysiou D D 2015 Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 759 [12] Kitano M and Hara M 2010 J. Mater. Chem. 20 627 [13] Xiong Z K, Zhang H, Zhang W C, Lai B and Yao G 2019 Chem. Eng. J. 359 13 [14] Radi M A, Nasirizadeh N, Rohani-Moghadam M and Dehghani M 2015 Ultrason. Sonochem. 27 609 [15] Ikehata K and Gamal El-Din M 2005 OZSE 27 173 [16] Amritha A S and Manu B 2016 Water. Sci. Technol 74 1919 [17] Wang J, Wang Z J, Vieira C L Z, Wolfson J M, Pingtian G and Huang S D 2019 Ultrason. Sonochem. 55 273 [18] Tyagi V K, Lo S L, Appels L and Dewil R 2014 Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 1220 [19] WuWH, ZhaiW, Hu H B andWei B B 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 194303 (in Chinese) [20] Ren J L, Zhang M D, Niu Y and Lin C P 2003 Piezoelect. Acoustoopt. 25 347 [21] Wei Z S and Weavers L K 2016 Ultrason. Sonochem. 31 490 [22] Zhang Z B, Gao T T, Liu X Y, Li D W, Zhao J W, Lei Y Q and Wang Y K 2018 Ultrason. Sonochem. 42 787 [23] Rashwan S S, Dincer I and Mohany A 2020 Ultrason. Sonochem. 68 105174 [24] Liu J H, Shen, Z Z, and Lin S Y 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 104302 [25] Zhai W, Liu H M, Hong Z Y, Xie W J and Wei B 2017 Ultrason. Sonochem. 34 130 [26] Tiong T J, Price G J and Kanagasingam S 2014 Ultrason. Sonochem. 21 1858 [27] Marmottant P, Versluis M, de Jong N, Hilgenfeldt S and Lohse D 2005 Exp. Fluids 41 147 [28] Guédra M, Cornu C and Inserra C 2017 Ultrason. Sonochem. 38 168 [29] Wen N, Snyder K, Scheib S, Qin Y, Li H and Chetty I J 2016 Med. Phys. 43 3448 [30] Nie G, Hu K, RenW, Zhou P, Duan X, Xiao L andWang S 2021 Water. Res. 198 117 [31] Hatanaka S I, Yasui K, Kozuka T, Tuziuti T and Mitome H 2002 Ultrason. Sonochem. 40 655 [32] Hatanaka S I, Yasui K, Kozuka T, Tuziuti T and Mitome H 2001 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40 3856 [33] Thangavadivel K, Okitsu K, Owens G, Lesniewski P J and Nishimura R 2013 J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 1 275 [34] Asakura Y, Nishida T, Matsuoka T and Koda S 2008 Ultrason. Sonochem. 15 244 [35] Son Y, Lim M, Ashokkumar M and Khim J 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 4096
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
