|
|
Effect of distribution of fines on evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game |
Xing-Ping Sun(孙兴平), Yan-Zheng Bi(毕研政), Hong-Wei Kang(康洪炜)†, Yong Shen(沈勇), and Qing-Yi Chen(陈清毅) |
School of Software, Yunnan University, Kunming 650000, China |
|
|
Abstract In the realm of public goods game, punishment, as a potent tool, stands out for fostering cooperation. While it effectively addresses the first-order free-rider problem, the associated costs can be substantial. Punishers incur expenses in imposing sanctions, while defectors face fines. Unfortunately, these monetary elements seemingly vanish into thin air, representing a loss to the system itself. However, by virtue of the redistribution of fines to cooperators and punishers, not only can we mitigate this loss, but the rewards for these cooperative individuals can be enhanced. Based upon this premise, this paper introduces a fine distribution mechanism to the traditional pool punishment model. Under identical parameter settings, by conducting a comparative experiment with the conventional punishment model, the paper aims to investigate the impact of fine distribution on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that, in instances where the punishment cost is prohibitively high, the cooperative strategies of the traditional pool punishment model may completely collapse. However, the model enriched with fine distribution manages to sustain a considerable number of cooperative strategies, thus highlighting its effectiveness in promoting and preserving cooperation, even in the face of substantial punishment cost.
|
Received: 22 April 2024
Revised: 26 May 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 24 June 2024
|
PACS:
|
02.50.Le
|
(Decision theory and game theory)
|
|
02.50.Ng
|
(Distribution theory and Monte Carlo studies)
|
|
02.60.Cb
|
(Numerical simulation; solution of equations)
|
|
02.70.Uu
|
(Applications of Monte Carlo methods)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Software Engineering of Yunnan Province (Grant Nos. 2020SE308 and 2020SE309). |
Corresponding Authors:
Hong-Wei Kang
E-mail: hwkang@ynu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xing-Ping Sun(孙兴平), Yan-Zheng Bi(毕研政), Hong-Wei Kang(康洪炜), Yong Shen(沈勇), and Qing-Yi Chen(陈清毅) Effect of distribution of fines on evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 090204
|
[1] Axelrod R and Hamilton W D 1981 Science 211 1390 [2] Axelrod R and Dion D 1988 Science 242 1385 [3] Nowak M A, Sasaki A, Taylor C and Fudenberg D 2004 Nature 428 646 [4] Rand D G and Nowak M A 2013 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 413 [5] Young C and Largent M 2007 Evolution and creationism: A documentary and reference guide (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press) p. 43 [6] Bowles S 2006 Science 314 1569 [7] Hardin G 1968 Science 162 1243 [8] Szabó G and Hauert C 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 062903 [9] Hauert C, De Monte S, Hofbauer J and Sigmund K 2002 Science 296 1129 [10] Nowak M A 2006 Science 314 1560 [11] Assenza S, Gómez-Gardeñes J and Latora V 2008 Phys. Rev. E 78 017101 [12] Lv S, Li J, Mi J and Zhao C 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126343 [13] Nowak M A and May R M 1992 Nature 359 826 [14] Rand D G, Dreber A, Ellingsen T, Fudenberg D and Nowak M A 2009 Science 325 1272 [15] Santos F C and Pacheco J M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 098104 [16] Santos F C, Rodrigues J F and Pacheco J M 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 056128 [17] Santos F C, Santos M D and Pacheco J M 2008 Nature 454 213 [18] Sasaki T and Unemi T 2011 J. Theor. Biol. 287 109 [19] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2010 Europhys. Lett. 92 38003 [20] Zhang C and Chen Z 2016 J. Stat. Mech. 2016 103201 [21] Sun X, Li M, Kang H, Shen Y and Chen Q 2023 Appl. Math. Comput. 445 127853 [22] Hua S and Liu L 2024 Expert Systems with Applications 237 121579 [23] Nakamaru M and Iwasa Y 2006 J. Theor. Biol. 240 475 [24] Eldakar O T and Wilson D S 2008 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 6982 [25] Cui P and Wu Z X 2014 J. Theor. Biol. 361 111 [26] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 041027 [27] Ozono H, Kamijo Y and Shimizu K 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 14379 [28] Wang Q, He N and Chen X 2018 Appl. Math. Comput. 328 162 [29] Boyd R and Mathew S 2007 Science 316 1858 [30] Brandt H, Hauert C and Sigmund K 2006 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 495 [31] Fowler J H 2005 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 7047 [32] Xia C Y, Meloni S and Moreno Y 2012 Adv. Complex Syst. 15 1250056 [33] Wu Y e, Zhang Z, Yan M and Zhang S 2019 Chaos 29 113101 [34] Danku Z, Perc M and Szolnoki A 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 262 [35] Sigmund K, Hauert C and Nowak M A 2001 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 10757 [36] Rockenbach B and Milinski M 2006 Nature 444 718 [37] Xia C, Wang J, Perc M and Wang Z 2023 Phys. Life Rev. 120 103683 [38] Wang J and Xia C 2023 Europhys. Lett. 141 21001 [39] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2015 Europhys. Lett. 110 38003 [40] Savani I, Bedeaux D, Kjelstrup S, Vassvik M, Sinha S and Hansen A 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 023116 [41] Wang M, Kang H, Shen Y, Sun X and Chen Q 2021 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 152 111395 [42] Liu L and Chen X 2020 Knowledge-Based Systems 188 104835 [43] Wang X, Duh M and Perc M 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126391 [44] Liu L, Xiao Z, Chen X and Szolnoki A 2022 J. R. Soc. Interface 19 20210755 [45] Li K, Cong R, Wu T and Wang L 2015 Phys. Rev. E 91 042810 [46] Cao X B, Du W B and Rong Z H 2010 Physica A 389 1273 [47] Tian L L, Li M C, Lu K, Zhao X W and Wang Z 2013 Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 54 65 [48] Quan J, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Tang C and Wang X 2019 J. Stat. Mech. 2019 043402 [49] Fan R, Zhang Y, Luo M and Zhang H 2017 Physica A 465 454 [50] Ding H, Zhang Y, Ren Y, Shi B and Choo K K R 2018 Soft Comput. 22 1287 [51] Kang H W, Jin Z Y, Li M Y, Wang M, Sun X P, Shen Y and Chen Q Y 2023 Chin. Phys. B 33 030203 [52] Andreoni J, Harbaugh W and Vesterlund L 2003 Am. Econom. Rev. 93 893 [53] Hauert C, De Monte S, Hofbauer J and Sigmund K 2002 J. Theor. Biol. 218 187 [54] Hauert C 2010 J. Theor. Biol. 267 22 [55] Orbell J M and Dawes R M 1993 Am. Sociol. Rev. 58 787 [56] Sefton M, Shupp R and Walker J M 2007 Econom. Inquiry 45 671 [57] Walker J M and Halloran M A 2004 Exp. Econom. 7 235 [58] Cressman R, Wu J J, Li C and Tao Y 2013 Biol. Theory 8 158 [59] Dong Y, Zhang B and Tao Y 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 28809 [60] Putterman L, Tyran J R and Kamei K 2011 J. Public Econom. 95 1213 [61] Traulsen A, Röhl T and Milinski M 2012 Proc. R. Soc. B 279 3716 [62] Wu J J, Li C, Zhang B Y, Cressman R and Tao Y 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 6421 [63] Yang C L, Zhang B, Charness G, Li C and Lien J W 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 9968 [64] Li M, Kang H, Sun X, Shen Y and Chen Q 2022 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 164 112747 [65] Helbing D, Szolnoki A, Perc M and Szabó G 2010 New J. Phys. 12 083005 [66] Szolnoki A, Szabó G and Perc M 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 036101 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|