INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Simulation study on cooperation behaviors and crowd dynamics in pedestrian evacuation |
Ya-Ping Ma(马亚萍)1,2, Hui Zhang(张辉)3 |
1 China Research Center for Emergency Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China; 2 School of Safety Science and Emergency Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China; 3 Institute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
Abstract Pedestrian evacuation is actually a process of behavioral evolution. Interaction behaviors between pedestrians affect not only the evolution of their cooperation strategy, but also their evacuation paths-scheduling and dynamics features. The existence of interaction behaviors and cooperation evolution is therefore critical for pedestrian evacuation. To address this issue, an extended cellular automaton (CA) evacuation model considering the effects of interaction behaviors and cooperation evolution is proposed here. The influence mechanism of the environment factor and interaction behaviors between neighbors on the decision-making of one pedestrian to path scheduling is focused. Average payoffs interacting with neighbors are used to represent the competitive ability of one pedestrian, aiming to solve the conflicts when more than one pedestrian competes for the same position based on a new method. Influences of interaction behaviors, the panic degree and the conflict cost on the evacuation dynamics and cooperation evolution of pedestrians are discussed. Simulation results of the room evacuation show that the interaction behaviors between pedestrians to a certain extent are beneficial to the evacuation efficiency and the formation of cooperation behaviors as well. The increase of conflict cost prolongs the evacuation time. Panic emotions of pedestrians are bad for cooperation behaviors of the crowd and have complex effects on evacuation time. A new self-organization effect is also presented.
|
Received: 05 September 2019
Revised: 05 January 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
89.40.-a
|
(Transportation)
|
|
05.50.+q
|
(Lattice theory and statistics)
|
|
05.45.Pq
|
(Numerical simulations of chaotic systems)
|
|
07.05.Tp
|
(Computer modeling and simulation)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2017YFC083300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91646201, U1633203, and 51808422), and the Independent Innovation Foundation of Wuhan University and Technology, China (Grant No. 2019IVA011). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ya-Ping Ma
E-mail: mayp18@whut.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Ya-Ping Ma(马亚萍), Hui Zhang(张辉) Simulation study on cooperation behaviors and crowd dynamics in pedestrian evacuation 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 038901
|
[1] |
Helbing D 2000 Nature 407 487
|
[2] |
Helbing D and Molnár P 1995 Phys. Rev. E 51 4282
|
[3] |
Li S Y, Zhuang J, Shen S F and Wang J 2017 Physica A 481 127
|
[4] |
Li Q R, Gao Y C, Chen L and Kang Z X 2019 Physica A 533 122068
|
[5] |
Kirchner A and Schadschneider A 2002 Physica A 312 260
|
[6] |
Luo L, Fu Z J, Cheng H and Yang L Z 2018 Physica A 491 946
|
[7] |
Helbing D, Isobe M, Nagatani T and Takimoto K 2003 Phys. Rev. E 67 067101
|
[8] |
Hao Q Y, Jiang R, Hu M B, Jia B and Wu Q S 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 036107
|
[9] |
Song W G, Xu X, Wang B H and Ni S J 2006 Physica A 363 492
|
[10] |
Fu L B, Song W G, Lv W and Liu X D 2016 Simul. Model. Pract. Th. 60 1
|
[11] |
Fang J, Tawil S E and Aguirre B 2015 J. Comput. Civil Eng. 30 04015066
|
[12] |
Li X L, Guo F, Kuang H and Zhou H G 2017 Physica A 487 47
|
[13] |
Chen S Y, Fu L B, Fang J and Tang P Y 2019 Physica A 534 122333
|
[14] |
Sieben A, Schumann J and Seyfried A 2017 Plos One 12 e0177328
|
[15] |
Zeng Y P, Song W G, Jin S and Ye R 2017 Physica A 479 26
|
[16] |
Cao S C, Song W G, Lv W and Fang Z M 2015 Physica A 436 45
|
[17] |
Wang X L, Guo W and Zheng X P 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 070504
|
[18] |
Lu L L, Ren G, Wang W and Wang Y 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 088901
|
[19] |
Chen C K and Tong T H 2019 Chin. Phys. B 23 010503
|
[20] |
Yang X X, Dong H R, Wang Q L, Chen Y and Hu X M 2014 Physica A 411 63
|
[21] |
Ibrahim A M, Venkat I and Wilde P D 2017 Physica A 479 485
|
[22] |
Nowak A M 2006 Science 314 1560
|
[23] |
Huang K K and Zheng X P 2017 Appl. Math. Comput. 298 57
|
[24] |
Zheng X P and Cheng Y 2011 Comput. Math. Appl. 62 4627
|
[25] |
Zheng X P and Cheng Y 2011 Physica A 390 1042
|
[26] |
Chen Y Z, Li M, Jiang R and Hu M B 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 088901
|
[27] |
Shi D M, Zhang W Y and Wang B H 2017 J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2017 043407
|
[28] |
Guan J B, Wang K H and Chen F Y 2016 Physica A 461 655
|
[29] |
Yanagisawa D, Kimura A, Tomoeda A, Nishi R, Suma Y, Ohtsuka K and Nishinari K 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 036110
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|