|
|
|
Evolutionary dynamics of tax-based strong altruistic reward and punishment in a public goods game |
| Zhi-Hao Yang(杨智昊) and Yan-Long Yang(杨彦龙)† |
| Mathematics and Statistics School, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In public goods games, punishments and rewards have been shown to be effective mechanisms for maintaining individual cooperation. However, punishments and rewards are costly to incentivize cooperation. Therefore, the generation of costly penalties and rewards has been a complex problem in promoting the development of cooperation. In real society, specialized institutions exist to punish evil people or reward good people by collecting taxes. We propose a strong altruistic punishment or reward strategy in the public goods game through this phenomenon. Through theoretical analysis and numerical calculation, we can get that tax-based strong altruistic punishment (reward) has more evolutionary advantages than traditional strong altruistic punishment (reward) in maintaining cooperation and tax-based strong altruistic reward leads to a higher level of cooperation than tax-based strong altruistic punishment.
|
Received: 28 February 2024
Revised: 14 May 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 31 May 2024
|
|
PACS:
|
02.50.Le
|
(Decision theory and game theory)
|
| |
05.45.Pq
|
(Numerical simulations of chaotic systems)
|
| |
02.60.Cb
|
(Numerical simulation; solution of equations)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71961003). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yan-Long Yang
E-mail: yylong1980@163.com
|
Cite this article:
Zhi-Hao Yang(杨智昊) and Yan-Long Yang(杨彦龙) Evolutionary dynamics of tax-based strong altruistic reward and punishment in a public goods game 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 090205
|
[1] Nowak M A 2006 Science 314 5805
[2] Doebeli M and Hauert C 2014 Ecol. Lett. 8 748
[3] Szabó G and Fáth G 2007 Phys. Rep. 446 97
[4] Wang Z, Kokubo S, Jusup M, et al. 2015 Phys. Life Rev. 14 1
[5] Tanimoto J and Sagara H 2007 Biosystems 90 105
[6] Hardin G 1968 Science 162 1243
[7] Michael W, Macy and Flache A 2002 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 7229
[8] Dawes and Robyn M 1980 Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31 169
[9] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2010 Euro. Phys. Lett. 92 38003
[10] Jonathan and Bolle F 2007 Econ. Lett. 96 133
[11] Fu F, Wu T and Wang L 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 036101
[12] Liu L, Chen X and Perc M 2019 Phys. Rev. E 97 749
[13] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2008 New J. Phys. 10 043036
[14] Perc M, Szolnoki A and Szabó G 2008 Phys. Rev. E 78 066101
[15] Tanimoto J 2007 Phys. Rev. E 76 021126
[16] Zhang Y, Fu F, Wu T, et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 066103
[17] Chen X and Szolnoki A 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 32802
[18] Li K, Cong R, Wu T, et al. 2015 Phys. Rev. E 91 042810
[19] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2009 Euro. Phys. Lett. 86 30007
[20] Hu K, Wang P, He J, et al. 2009 Phys. Rev. E 107 044301
[21] Sun X, Li M, Kang H, et al. 2023 Appl. Math. Comput. 445 127853
[22] Szolnoki A, Perc M and Szabó G 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 056109
[23] Szabó G and Hauert C 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 118101
[24] Hamburger H 1973 J. Math. Sociol. 3 27
[25] Choi J and Ahn T 2013 J. Econ. Psychol. 35 17
[26] Chen X, Sasaki T and Perc M 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 17050
[27] Sasaki T, Brnnstrm, Dieckmann U, et al. 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 1165
[28] Rockenbach B and Milinski M 2006 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 444 718
[29] Helbingh D, Szolnoki A, Perc M, et al. 2010 New J. Phys. 12 083005
[30] Sasaki T, Uchida S and Chen X 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 8917
[31] Milinski M and Rockenbach B 2012 J. Theor. Biol. 299 139
[32] Sutter M, Haigner S and Kocher M 2010 Rev. Econ. Stud. 77 1540
[33] Sefton M, Shupp R and Walker J 2007 Econ. Inq. 45 671
[34] Wu Y, Chang S and Zhang Z 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 41076
[35] Wang S, Chen X and Szolnoki A 2019 Sci. Rep. 79 104914
[36] Wang X J,Gu C L,Lv S J, et al. 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 020203
[37] Yang L and Zhang L 2021 Chaos Solitons Fractals 142 110485
[38] Sun X, Han L, Wang M, et al. 2023 Phys. Lett. A 474 128837
[39] Wang X, Duh M and Perc M 2020 Europhys. Lett. 132 38001
[40] Szolnoki A and Chen X 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 052316
[41] Szolnoki A and Chen X 2021 Chaos Solitons Fractals 152 111395
[42] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2015 Phys. Rev. E 282 20151975
[43] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2012 New J. Phys. 14 093016
[44] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 041027
[45] Helbing D, Szolnoki A, Perc M, et al. 2010 New J. Phys. 12 083005
[46] Sasaki T and Unemi T 2011 J. Theor. Biol. 287 109
[47] David J and Francis 1999 Third World Q. 20 319
[48] Wang S, Liu L and Chen X 2021 Phys. Lett. A 386 126965
[49] Shen Y, Lei W, Kan H, et al. 2023 Chaos Solitons Fractals 175 114030
[50] Hofbauer J and Sigmund K 2011 Bull. Am. Math.Soc. 40 479 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
