|
|
A quantum blind signature scheme based on dense coding for non-entangled states |
Ke Xing(邢柯)†, Ai-Han Yin(殷爱菡)‡, and Yong-Qi Xue(薛勇奇) |
Department of Information Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China |
|
|
Abstract In some schemes, quantum blind signatures require the use of difficult-to-prepare multiparticle entangled states. By considering the communication overhead, quantum operation complexity, verification efficiency and other relevant factors in practical situations, this article proposes a non-entangled quantum blind signature scheme based on dense encoding. The information owner utilizes dense encoding and hash functions to blind the information while reducing the use of quantum resources. After receiving particles, the signer encrypts the message using a one-way function and performs a Hadamard gate operation on the selected single photon to generate the signature. Then the verifier performs a Hadamard gate inverse operation on the signature and combines it with the encoding rules to restore the message and complete the verification. Compared with some typical quantum blind signature protocols, this protocol has strong blindness in privacy protection, and higher flexibility in scalability and application. The signer can adjust the signature operation according to the actual situation, which greatly simplifies the complexity of the signature. By simultaneously utilizing the secondary distribution and rearrangement of non-entangled quantum states, a non-entangled quantum state representation of three bits of classical information is achieved, reducing the use of a large amount of quantum resources and lowering implementation costs. This improves both signature verification efficiency and communication efficiency while, at the same time, this scheme meets the requirements of unforgeability, non-repudiation, and prevention of information leakage.
|
Received: 20 October 2023
Revised: 31 January 2024
Accepted manuscript online: 22 February 2024
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
03.67.Ac
|
(Quantum algorithms, protocols, and simulations)
|
|
03.67.Dd
|
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
|
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61762039). |
Corresponding Authors:
Ke Xing, Ai-Han Yin
E-mail: 1400373041@qq.com;yinaihan@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Ke Xing(邢柯), Ai-Han Yin(殷爱菡), and Yong-Qi Xue(薛勇奇) A quantum blind signature scheme based on dense coding for non-entangled states 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 060309
|
[1] Amjad M and Raju 2018 Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development 2 482 [2] Xin X J, Ding L, Li C Y, Sang Y X, Yang Q L and Li F G 2021 Quantum Information Processing 21 1 [3] Chen F L, Wang Z H and Hu Y M 2019 Entropy 21 336 [4] Shang T, Pei Z, Chen R and Liu J 2019 Computers, Materials & Continua 59 149 [5] hen F L and Han Z F 2016 International Journal of Quantum Information 14 1650041 [6] Fan L and Cao C 2019 International Journal of Quantum Information 17 1950007 [7] Tiliwalidi K, Zhang J Z and Xie S C 2019 International Journal of Theoretical Physics. 58 3510 [8] Feng X N, Wu H Y, Zhou X L and Yao Y 2022 Quantum Information Processing 22 5 [9] Wen X J, Niu X M, Ji L P and Tian Y 2009 Opt. Commun. 282 666 [10] Xu R, Huang L S, Yang W and He L B 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 3654 [11] Xu G B and Zhang K J 2015 Quantum Information Processing 14 2577 [12] Guo X, Zhang J Z and Xie S C 2018 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 57 2657 [13] He Y F and Ma W P 2021 Modern Physics Letters B 35 2150195 [14] Lei L and Zhi L 2022 Information Sciences 585 232 [15] Zhou Y H, Qin S F, Shi W M and Yang Y G 2022 Quantum Information Processing 21 303 [16] Gou X L, Shi R H, Shi Z and Li K C 2021 Modern Physics Letters A 36 2150040 [17] Xiong Z H and Yin A H 2022 Quantum Information Processing 21 140 [18] Chen B C and Yan L L 2021 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 60 4006 [19] Xia C Y, Li H F and Hu J 2021 Euro. Phys. J. Plus 136 633 [20] Tian Y, Chen H, Ji S F, Han Z P, Lian H G and Wen X J 2014 Optical and Quantum Electronics 46 769 [21] Zhang W, Qiu D W, Zou X F and Mateus P 2017 Quantum Information Processing 16 150 [22] Liang X Q, Wu Y L, Zhang Y H, Wang S S and Xu G B 2019 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 58 31 [23] Liu G, Ma W P, Cao H and Lyu L D 2019 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 58 1999 [24] Zheng T, Chang Y and Zhang S B 2020 Quantum Information Processing 19 163 [25] Li X Y, Chang Y, Zhang S B, Dai J Q and Zheng T 2020 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 59 2059 [26] Niu X F, Ma W P, Chen B Q, Liu G and Wang Q Z 2020 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 59 1121 [27] Zhu H F, Zhang Y L and Li Z X 2021 International Journal of Theoretical Physics. 60 2311 [28] Xin X J, He Q Q, Wang Z, Yang Q L and Li F G 2019 Modern Physics Letters A 34 1950166 [29] Wang M Q, Wang X and Zhan T 2018 Quantum Information Processing 17 275 [30] Aili M and Abulizi A 2019 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 58 364 [31] He W T, Wang J, Zhang T T, Alzahrani F, Hobiny A, Alsaedi A, Hayat T and Deng F G 2019 International Journal of Theoretical Physics 58 2834 [32] Meher N 2020 J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53 065502 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|