|
|
Nondegenerate solitons of the (2+1)-dimensional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations with variable coefficients in nonlinear optical fibers |
Wei Yang(杨薇)1, Xueping Cheng(程雪苹)2,†, Guiming Jin(金桂鸣)1, and Jianan Wang(王佳楠)1 |
1 School of Information Engineering, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China; 2 School of Science, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China |
|
|
Abstract We derive the multi-hump nondegenerate solitons for the (2+1)-dimensional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations with propagation distance dependent diffraction, nonlinearity and gain (loss) using the developing Hirota bilinear method, and analyze the dynamical behaviors of these nondegenerate solitons. The results show that the shapes of the nondegenerate solitons are controllable by selecting different wave numbers, varying diffraction and nonlinearity parameters. In addition, when all the variable coefficients are chosen to be constant, the solutions obtained in this study reduce to the shape-preserving nondegenerate solitons. Finally, it is found that the nondegenerate two-soliton solutions can be bounded to form a double-hump two-soliton molecule after making the velocity of one double-hump soliton resonate with that of the other one.
|
Received: 30 June 2023
Revised: 20 August 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 22 August 2023
|
PACS:
|
02.30.Ik
|
(Integrable systems)
|
|
02.30.Jr
|
(Partial differential equations)
|
|
42.81.Dp
|
(Propagation, scattering, and losses; solitons)
|
|
Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.11975204 and 12075208), the Project of Zhoushan City Science and Technology Bureau (Grant No.2021C21015), and the Training Program for Leading Talents in Universities of Zhejiang Province. |
Corresponding Authors:
Xueping Cheng
E-mail: chengxp2005@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Wei Yang(杨薇), Xueping Cheng(程雪苹), Guiming Jin(金桂鸣), and Jianan Wang(王佳楠) Nondegenerate solitons of the (2+1)-dimensional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations with variable coefficients in nonlinear optical fibers 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 120202
|
[1] Hasegawa A and Tappert F 1973 Appl. Phys. Lett. 23 142 [2] Mollenauer L F, Stolen R H and Gordon J P 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 1095 [3] Mollenauer L F and Smith K 1988 Opt. Lett. 13 675 [4] Hasegawa A 1984 Appl. Opt. 23 3302 [5] Hasegawa A and Kodama Y 1995 Solitons in Optical Communications (Oxford: Clarendon Press) [6] Dauxois T and Peyrard M 2006 Physics of Solitons (New York: Cambridge University Press) [7] Agrawal G P 2007 Nonlinear Fiber Optics (San Diego, CA: Academic Press) [8] Akhmediev N N and Ankiewicz A 2010 Dissipative Solitons: From Optics to Biology and Medicine (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) [9] Porsezian K and Kuriakose V 2003 Optical Solitons: Theoretical and Experimental Challenges (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) [10] Akhmediev N and Ankiewicz A 2000 Chaos 10 600 [11] Stalin S, Ramakrishnan R, Senthilvelan M and Lakshmanan M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 043901 [12] Che W J, Liu C and Akhmediev N 2023 Phys. Rev. E 107 054206 [13] Liu C, Chen S C, Yao X and Akhmediev N 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 094201 [14] Chen S C, Liu C and Akhmediev N 2023 Phys. Rev. A 107 063507 [15] Ramakrishnan R, Stalin S and Lakshmanan M 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 042212 [16] Cai Y J, Wu J W and Lin J 2022 Chaos Solitons Fractals 164 112657 [17] Qin Y H, Zhao L C and Ling L M 2019 Phy. Rev. E 100 022212 [18] Geng K L, Mou D S and Dai C Q 2023 Nonlinear Dyn. 111 603 [19] Chen X, Mihalache D and Rao J G 2023 Nonlinear Dyn. 111 697 [20] Stalin S, Ramakrishnan R and Lakshmanan M 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126201 [21] Cai Y J, Wu J W, Hu L T and Lin J 2021 Phys. Scr. 96 095212 [22] Mou D S and Dai C Q 2022 Appl. Math. Lett. 133 108230 [23] Stalin S, Ramakrishnan R and Lakshmanan M 2022 Phys. Rev. E 105 044203 [24] Zhang C R, Tian B, Qu Q X, Liu L and Tian H Y 2020 Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 71 18 [25] Liu C, Chen S C, Yao X K and Akhmediev N 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 094201 [26] Zhang G Q, Yan Z Y, Wen X Y and Chen Y 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 042201 [27] Song S, Xue H and Xue Y K 2020 Commu. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 82 105046 [28] Baronio F, Wabnitz S and Kodama Y 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 173901 [29] Riaz H and Wajahat A 2019 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134 222 [30] Wang L, Zhang J H, Liu C, Li M and Qi F H 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 062217 [31] Wu G Z and Dai C Q 2020 Appl. Math. Lett. 106 106365 [32] Silem A and Lin J 2023 Appl. Math. Lett. 135 108397 [33] Gao Z Y, Song S N, Zhang K and Guo X J 2017 Optik 147 306 [34] Manikandan K, Senthilvelan M and Kraenkel R A 2016 Eur. Phys. J. B 89 218 [35] Xie X Y, Tian B, Sun W R and Sun Y 2015 Commu. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 29 300 [36] Wu H Y and Jiang L H 2019 Nonlinear Dyn. 95 3401 [37] Gao Z Y, Song S N and Duan J 2018 Optik 172 953 [38] Hirota R 1973 J. Math. Phys. 14 805 [39] Yin K H, Cheng X P and Lin J 2021 Chin. Phys. Lett. 38 080201 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|