CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Dynamics of entropic uncertainty for three types of three-level atomic systems under the random telegraph noise |
Xiong Xu(许雄), Mao-Fa Fang(方卯发) |
Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications, Key Laboratory of Low-dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China |
|
|
Abstract We study the dynamics of the entropic uncertainty for three types of three-level atomic systems coupled to an environment modeled by random matrices. The results show that the entropic uncertainty in the Ξ-type atomic system is lower than that in the V-type atomic system which is exactly the same as that in the Λ-type atomic system. In addition, the effect of relative coupling strength on entropic uncertainty is opposite in Markov region and non-Markov region, and the influence of a common environment and independent environments in Markov region and non-Markov region is also opposite. One can reduce the entropic uncertainty by decreasing relative coupling strength or placing the system in two separate environments in the Markov case. In the non-Markov case, the entropic uncertainty can be reduced by increasing the relative coupling strength or by placing the system in a common environment.
|
Received: 05 February 2020
Revised: 03 March 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
73.63.Nm
|
(Quantum wires)
|
|
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
85.35.Be
|
(Quantum well devices (quantum dots, quantum wires, etc.))
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11374096). |
Corresponding Authors:
Mao-Fa Fang
E-mail: mffang@hunnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xiong Xu(许雄), Mao-Fa Fang(方卯发) Dynamics of entropic uncertainty for three types of three-level atomic systems under the random telegraph noise 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 057305
|
[1] |
Heisenberg W 1927 Z. Phys. 43 172
|
[2] |
Robertson H P 1929 Phys. Rev. 34 163
|
[3] |
Maassen H and Uffink J 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1103
|
[4] |
Renes J and Boileau J 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 032335
|
[5] |
Renes J and Boileau J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 020402
|
[6] |
Berta M, Christandl M, Colbeck R, Renes J M and Renner R 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 659
|
[7] |
Li C F, Xu J S, Xu X Y, Li K and Guo G C 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 752
|
[8] |
Nataf P, Dogan M and Hur K L 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 043807
|
[9] |
Tomamichel M, Lim C C, Gisin N and Renner R 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 634
|
[10] |
Dupuis F, Fawzi O and Wehner S 2015 IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 61 1093
|
[11] |
Hu M L and Fan H 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 022314
|
[12] |
Hu M L and Fan H 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 014105
|
[13] |
Zou H M, Fang M F, Yang B Y, Guo Y N, He W and Zhang S Y 2014 Phys. Scr. 89 115101
|
[14] |
Coles P J and Piani M 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 010302
|
[15] |
Hall M and Wiseman H 2012 New J. Phys. 14 033040
|
[16] |
Prevedel R, Hamel D R, Colbeck R, Fisher K and Resch K J 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 757
|
[17] |
Hu M and Fan H 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 032338
|
[18] |
Zhang Y, Fang M, Kang G and Zhou Q 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 172
|
[19] |
Xu Z Y, Yang W L and Feng M 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 012113
|
[20] |
Ming F, Wang D, Shi W N, Huang A J, Sun W Y and Ye L 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 89
|
[21] |
Huang A J, Wang D, Wang J M, Shi J D, Sun W Y and Ye L 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 204
|
[22] |
Feng J, Zhang Y Z, Gould M D and Fan H 2013 Phys. Lett. B 726 527
|
[23] |
Jia L J, Tian Z H and Jing J L 2015 Ann. Phys. 353 37
|
[24] |
Zheng X and Zhang G F 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 1
|
[25] |
Guo Y N, Fang M F and Zeng K 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 187
|
[26] |
Guo Y N, Fang M F, Tian Q L, Li Z D and Zeng K 2018 Laser Phys. Lett. 15 105205
|
[27] |
Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G and Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 412 313
|
[28] |
Fickler R, Lapkiewicz R, Huber M, Lavery M P, Padgett M J and Zeilinger A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4502
|
[29] |
Molina-Terriza G, Vaziri A, Ursin R and Zeilinger A 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 040501
|
[30] |
Inoue R, Yonehara T, Miyamoto Y, Koashi M and Kozuma M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 110503
|
[31] |
Walborn S P, Lemelle D S, Almeida M P and Ribeiro P H S 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 090501
|
[32] |
Galperin Y M, Altshuler B L, Bergli J, and Shantsev D V 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 097009
|
[33] |
Abel B and Marquardt F 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 201302
|
[34] |
Joynt R, Zhou D and Wang Q H 2011 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 25 2115
|
[35] |
Rossi M A C and Paris M G A 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 024113
|
[36] |
Benedetti C, Buscemi F, Bordone P and Paris M G A 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 052328
|
[37] |
Paladino E, Galperin Y M, Falci G and Altshuler B L 2014 Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 361
|
[38] |
Carrera M, Gorin T and Pineda C 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 042322
|
[39] |
Arthur T T, Martin T and Fai L C 2017 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 15 1750047
|
[40] |
Arthur T T, Martin T and Fai L C 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 37
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|