CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effect of particle size distribution on magnetic behavior of nanoparticles with uniaxial anisotropy |
S Rizwan Ali1, Farah Naz1, Humaira Akber1, M Naeem1, S Imran Ali2, S Abdul Basit3, M Sarim3, Sadaf Qaseem1 |
1 Department of Physics, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan;
2 Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan;
3 Department of Computer Science, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan |
|
|
Abstract The effect of particle size distribution on the field and temperature dependence of the hysteresis loop features like coercivity (HC), remanence (MR), and blocking temperature (TB) is simulated for an ensemble of single domain ferromagnetic nanoparticles with uniaxial anisotropy. Our simulations are based on the two-state model for T<TB and the metropolis Monte-Carlo method for T>TB. It is found that the increase in the grain size significantly enhances HC and TB. The presence of interparticle exchange interaction in the system suppresses HC but causes MR to significantly increase. Our results show that the parameters associated with the particle size distribution (Dd,δ) such as the mean particle size d and standard-deviation δ play key roles in the magnetic behavior of the system.
|
Received: 10 April 2018
Revised: 29 June 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
75.50.Tt
|
(Fine-particle systems; nanocrystalline materials)
|
|
75.40.Mg
|
(Numerical simulation studies)
|
|
75.60.Ej
|
(Magnetization curves, hysteresis, Barkhausen and related effects)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
S Rizwan Ali
E-mail: rizwan@fuuast.edu.pk
|
Cite this article:
S Rizwan Ali, Farah Naz, Humaira Akber, M Naeem, S Imran Ali, S Abdul Basit, M Sarim, Sadaf Qaseem Effect of particle size distribution on magnetic behavior of nanoparticles with uniaxial anisotropy 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 097503
|
[1] |
Bedoya-Hincapie C M, Ortiz-Alvarez H H, Restrepo-Parraa E, Olaya-Florez J J and Alfonso J E 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 117701
|
[2] |
Sheng-Nan S, Chao W, Zan-Zan Z, Yang-Long H, Venkatraman S S and Zhi-Chuan X 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 037503
|
[3] |
Masrour R, Bahmad R, Benyoussef A 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 057504
|
[4] |
Wu X W, Guslienko K Y, Chantrell R W and Weller D 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 3475
|
[5] |
Guimarâe Alberto P 2009 Principles of Nanomagnetism (Berlin:Springer Science & Business Media) p. 38[ISBN 978-3642014819]
|
[6] |
Munoz-Sandoval E, Torres-Heredia J J and López-Urías F 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 10
|
[7] |
Weller D and Moser A 1999 IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 6
|
[8] |
Skumryev V, Stoyanov S, Zhang Y, Hadjipanayis G, Givord D and Nogués J 2003 Nature 423 850
|
[9] |
Lv D L and Xu C 2010 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 097503
|
[10] |
Sánchez R D, Rivas J, Vaqueiro P, López-Quintela M A and Caeiro D 2002 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 247 92
|
[11] |
Hansen M F and Morup S 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 203 214
|
[12] |
Xu C, Li Z Y and Hui P M 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 3403
|
[13] |
Stoner E C and Wohlfarth E P 1948 Phil. Tran. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 240 599
|
[14] |
Wernsdorfer W, Orozco E B, Hasselbach K, Benoit A, Barbara B, Demoncy N, Loiseau A, Pascard H and Mailly D 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1791
|
[15] |
Bodker F, Morup S and Linderoth S 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 282
|
[16] |
Respaud M 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 86 556
|
[17] |
Cullity B D and Graham C D 2011 Introduction Magn. Mater. (Massachusetts:John Wiley & Sons) p. 425[ISBN 978-1118211496]
|
[18] |
Kechrakos D and Trohidou K N 2003 J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 262 107
|
[19] |
Aharoni A 2000 Introduction Theory Ferromagnetism (New York:Clarendon Press) p. 92[ISBN 978-0198508090]
|
[20] |
Chuev M A and Hesse J 2007 J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 19 506201
|
[21] |
Tannous C and Gieraltowski J 2008 Eur. J. Phys. 29 475
|
[22] |
Serantes D and Baldomir D 2012 Open Surf. Sci. J. 4 71
|
[23] |
Sattler K D 2011 Handbook Nanophyscis:Nanoparticles Quantum Dots (Boca Raton:CRC Press) p. 228[ISBN 978-1420075441]
|
[24] |
Pfeiffer H 1990 Phys. Status Solidi A 122 377
|
[25] |
Du H F and Du A 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 104306
|
[26] |
Jaffari G H, Ali S R, Hasanain S K, Güntherodt G and Shah S I J. Appl. Phys. 108 063921
|
[27] |
Chesnel K, Trevino M, Cai Y, Hancock J M, Smith S J and Harrison R G 2014 J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. 521 012004
|
[28] |
Verdes C, Diaz B R, Thompson S M, R Chantrell W and Stancu A 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 174417
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|