| PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Synchrotron radiation intensity and energy of runaway electrons in EAST tokamak |
| Y K Zhang(张永宽)1,2, R J Zhou(周瑞杰)1, L Q Hu(胡立群)1, M W Chen(陈美文)1,2, Y Chao(晁燕)1,2, EAST team |
1 Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;
2 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract A detailed analysis of the synchrotron radiation intensity and energy of runaway electrons is presented for the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST). In order to make the energy of the calculated runaway electrons more accurate, we take the Shafranov shift into account. The results of the analysis show that the synchrotron radiation intensity and energy of runaway electrons did not reach the maximum at the same time. The energy of the runaway electrons reached the maximum first, and then the synchrotron radiation intensity of the runaway electrons reached the maximum. We also analyze the runaway electrons density, and find that the density of runaway electrons continuously increased. For this reason, although the energy of the runaway electrons dropped but the synchrotron radiation intensity of the runaway electrons would continue rising for a while.
|
Received: 26 December 2017
Revised: 30 January 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
PACS:
|
52.75.-d
|
(Plasma devices)
|
| |
52.77.-j
|
(Plasma applications)
|
| |
52.80.Hc
|
(Glow; corona)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.11775263 and 11405219),the JSPS-NRF-NSFC A3 Foresight Program in the Field of Plasma Physics,China (Grant No.11261140328),and the National Magnetic Confnement Fusion Science Program of China (Grant No.2015GB102004). |
Corresponding Authors:
R J Zhou
E-mail: rjzhou@ipp.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Y K Zhang(张永宽), R J Zhou(周瑞杰), L Q Hu(胡立群), M W Chen(陈美文), Y Chao(晁燕), EAST team Synchrotron radiation intensity and energy of runaway electrons in EAST tokamak 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 055206
|
| [1] |
Fussmann G 1979 Nuclear Fusion 19 327
|
| [2] |
Dreicer H 1959 Phys. Rev. 115 238
|
| [3] |
Zhou R J, Hu L Q, Li E Z, et al. 2013 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 55 055006
|
| [4] |
Bakhtiari M, Kramer G J, Takechi M, et al. 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 215003
|
| [5] |
Yoshino R, Kondoh T, Neyatani Y, et al. 1997 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 39 313
|
| [6] |
Esposito B, Martin-Solis J R, Poli F M, et al. 2003 Physics of Plasmas 10 2350
|
| [7] |
Jaspers R, Lopes Cardozo N J, Donne A J H, et al. 2001 Review of Scientific Instruments 72 466
|
| [8] |
Pankratov I M 1996 Plasma Physics Reports 22 535
|
| [9] |
Guan X, Qin H and Fisch N J 2010 Physics of Plasmas 17 092502
|
| [10] |
Zhou R J, Pankratov I M, Hu L Q, et al. 2014 Physics of Plasmas 21 063302
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
