ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Increasing the range accuracy of three-dimensional ghost imaging ladar using optimum slicing number method |
Yang Xu (杨旭), Zhang Yong (张勇), Xu Lu (徐璐), Yang Cheng-Hua (杨成华), Wang Qiang (王强), Liu Yue-Hao (刘越豪), Zhao Yuan (赵远) |
Department of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China |
|
|
Abstract The range accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) ghost imaging is derived. Based on the derived range accuracy equation, the relationship between the slicing number and the range accuracy is analyzed and an optimum slicing number (OSN) is determined. According to the OSN, an improved 3D ghost imaging algorithm is proposed to increase the range accuracy. Experimental results indicate that the slicing number can affect the range accuracy significantly and the highest range accuracy can be achieved if the 3D ghost imaging system works with OSN.
|
Received: 28 April 2015
Revised: 07 July 2015
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.30.Va
|
(Image forming and processing)
|
|
42.50.Dv
|
(Quantum state engineering and measurements)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Young Scientist Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61108072). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhao Yuan
E-mail: zhaoyuan@hit.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yang Xu (杨旭), Zhang Yong (张勇), Xu Lu (徐璐), Yang Cheng-Hua (杨成华), Wang Qiang (王强), Liu Yue-Hao (刘越豪), Zhao Yuan (赵远) Increasing the range accuracy of three-dimensional ghost imaging ladar using optimum slicing number method 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 124202
|
[1] |
Gatti A, Brambilla E and Lugiato L A 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 093602
|
[2] |
Gatti A, Bache M and Magatti D 2006 J. Mod. Opt. 53 739
|
[3] |
Valencia A, Scarcelli G and D' Angelo M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 063601
|
[4] |
Gatti A, Magatti D and Bache M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 183602
|
[5] |
Basano L and Ottonello P 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 091109
|
[6] |
Erkmen B I and Shapiro J H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 043809
|
[7] |
Erkmen B I and Shapiro J H 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 023833
|
[8] |
Bromberg Y, Katz O and Silberberg Y 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 053840
|
[9] |
Hardy N D and Shapiro J H 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 063824
|
[10] |
Cheng J 2009 Opt. Express 17 7916
|
[11] |
Shi D, Fan C and Zhang P 2013 Opt. Express 21 2050
|
[12] |
Chan K W, O'Sullivan M N and Boyd R W 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 033808
|
[13] |
Duan D and Xia Y 2014 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 31 183
|
[14] |
Li L Z, Yao X R and Liu X F 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 224201 (in Chinese)
|
[15] |
Gong W, Zhao C and Jiao J 2013 arXiv:1301.5767 [quant-ph]
|
[16] |
Hong Y, Li E R and Gong W L 2015 Opt. Express 23 14541
|
[17] |
Bache M, Brambilla E and Gatti A 2004 Opt. Express 12 6067
|
[18] |
Cheng J, Han S and Yan Y 2006 Chin. Phys. 15 2002
|
[19] |
Erkmen B I and Shapiro J H 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 023833
|
[20] |
Hardy N D and Shapiro J H 2010 SPIE Optical Engineering+Applications, August 30, 2010, San Diego, California, USA, p. 78150L
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|