INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Ionic conductivity study on electron beam irradiated polyacrylonitrile–polyethylene oxide gel |
Ma Yi-Zhun (马艺准)a)b),Pang Li-Long(庞立龙)a)b),Zhu Ya-Bin(朱亚滨)a)b), Wang Zhi-Guang(王志光)a)†, and Shen Tie-Long(申铁龙)a)b) |
a Institute of Modern Physics, Lanzhou 730000, China; b Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100490, China |
|
|
Abstract Different mass percent polyacrylonitrile (PAN)–polyethylene oxide (PEO) gels were prepared and irradiated by an electron beam (EB) with energy of 1.0 MeV to the dose ranging from 13 kGy to 260 kGy. The gels were analysed by using Fourier transform infrared spectrum, gel fraction and ionic conductivity (IC) measurement. The results show that the gel is crosslinked by EB irradiation, the crosslinking degree rises with the increasing EB irradiation dose (ID) and the mass percents of both PAN and PEO contribute a lot to the crosslinking; in addition, EB irradiation can promote the IC of PAN–PEO gels. There exists an optimum irradiation dose, at which the IC can increase dramatically. The IC changes of the PAN–PEO gels along with ID are divided into three regions: IC rapidly increasing region, IC decreasing region and IC balanced region. The cause of the change can be ascribed to two aspects, gel capturing electron degree and crosslinking degree. By comparing the IC–ID curves of different mass percents of PAN and PEO in gel, we found that PAN plays a more important role for gel IC promotion than PEO, since addition of PAN in gel causes the IC–ID curve sharper, while addition of PEO in gel causes the curve milder.
|
Received: 14 December 2010
Revised: 14 January 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
81.15.Jj
|
(Ion and electron beam-assisted deposition; ion plating)
|
|
82.70.Gg
|
(Gels and sols)
|
|
Cite this article:
Ma Yi-Zhun (马艺准), Pang Li-Long(庞立龙), Zhu Ya-Bin(朱亚滨), Wang Zhi-Guang(王志光), and Shen Tie-Long(申铁龙) Ionic conductivity study on electron beam irradiated polyacrylonitrile–polyethylene oxide gel 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 078104
|
[1] |
Choi B K, Kim Y W and Shin H K 2000 Electrochim. Acta 45 1371
|
[2] |
Rajendran S, Mahalingam T and Kannan R 2000 Solid State Ionics 130 143
|
[3] |
Yuan F, Chen H Z, Yang H Y, Li H Y and Wang M 2005 Mater. Chem. Phys. 89 390
|
[4] |
Uchiyama R, Kusagawa K, Hanai K, Imanishi N, Hirano A and Takeda Y 2009 Solid State Ionics 180 205
|
[5] |
Akhtar M S, Choi D J, Lee S K and Yang O B 2010 Curr. Appl. Phys. 10 S161
|
[6] |
Oliveira V M, Ortiz A V, Mastro N L and Moura E A B 2009 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 78 553
|
[7] |
Mishra J K, Chang Y W, Lee B C and Ryu S H 2008 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 77 675
|
[8] |
Vijayabaskar V, Stephan M, Kalaivani S, Volke S, Heinrich G, Dorschner H, Bhowmick A K and Wagenknecht U 2008 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 77 511
|
[9] |
Cerrada M L, Benavente R, Fernandez-Garcia M, Perez E, Campos J M and Ribeiro M R 2009 Polym. J. 50 1095
|
[10] |
Sheikh N, Jalili L and Anvari F 2010 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 79 735
|
[11] |
Zagorski Z P 2004 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 71 261
|
[12] |
Hwang I T, Jung C H, Kuk I S, Choi J H and Nho Y C 2010 Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res., Sect. B bf 268 3368
|
[13] |
Perraud S, Vallat M F, David M O and Kuczynski J 2010 Polym. Degrad. Stab. 95 1495
|
[14] |
Ying S K 1964 J. Dalian Univ. Technol. 3 69 (in Chinese)
|
[15] |
Xiong B T, Zhou B X, Bai J, Zheng Q, Liu Y B, Cai W M and Cai J 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 3713
|
[16] |
Guo L, Liang L Y, Chen C, Wang M T, Kong M G and Wang K J 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 4270 (in Chinese)
|
[17] |
Liu W Q, Kou D X, Hu L H, Huang Y and Jiang N Q 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 5141 (in Chinese)
|
[18] |
Liang L Y, Dai S Y, Hu L H, Dai J and Liu W Q 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 1338 (in Chinese)
|
[19] |
Kou D X, Liu W Q, Hu L H, Huang Y, Dai S Y and Jiang N Q 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 5857 (in Chinese)
|
[20] |
Liang L Y, Dai S Y, Fang X Q and Hu L H 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 1956 (in Chinese)
|
[21] |
Zagórski Z P 2004 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 71 263
|
[22] |
Sheikh N, Jalili L and Anvari F 2010 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 79 735
|
[23] |
Linggawati A, Mohammad A W and Ghazali Z 2009 Eur. Polym. J. 45 2797
|
[24] |
Yoshii F, Zhanshan Y, Isobe K, Shinozaki K and Makuuchi K 1999 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 55 133
|
[25] |
Zhao L, Mitomo H, Zhai M L, Yoshii F, Nagasawa N and Kume T 2003 Carbohydr. Polym. 53 439
|
[26] |
Gottlieb M H and Sollner K 1968 Biophys. J. bf 8 515
|
[27] |
Johnson H D, Cooper W J, Mezyk S P and Bartels D M 2002 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 65 317
|
[28] |
Zaikin Y A, Ismailova G A and Al-Sheikhly M 2007 it Radiat. Phys. Chem. 76 1404
|
[29] |
Teruo M and Kyoichi S 1973 J. Appl. Phys. 44 5372
|
[30] |
Yang H X, Huang M L, Wu J H, Lan Z, Hao S C and Lin J M 2008 Mater. Chem. Phys. 110 38
|
[31] |
Wang Y M 2009 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93 1167
|
[32] |
Li P J, Wu J H, Huang M L, Hao S C, Lan Z, Li Q H and Kang S J 2007 Electrochim. Acta 53 903
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|