CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Effect of transparency on Josephson junction between s+g-wave superconductors |
Gholamreza Rashedi† |
Department of Physics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran |
|
|
Abstract In this paper, a dc Josephson junction between borocarbide superconductors has been studied theoretically. The s+g-wave pairing symmetry which is observed in rare earth complex of borocarbides has a huge anisotropy and is an interesting form of unconventional superconductivity. We calculate the Josephson current in a superconductor–insulator–superconductor (SIS) Josephson junction with s+g-wave superconducting pairing symmetry. In our planar junction c-axis is parallel to an interface with finite transparency but ab-planes of two tetragonal superconductors are misorientated by angle $\alpha$. We obtain that the Josephson current is strongly dependent on mis-orientation between the left and the right ab-planes. An insulator sandwiched between two superconductors which acts as a potential barrier is demonstrated by a transparency coefficient. The effects of the potential barrier and the mis-orientation on the current are studied analytically and numerically. Occurrence of 0–$\pi$ transition in this s+g-wave junction is investigated in this paper. A comparison between d-wave Josephson junction and s+g-wave one is also made in the present paper.
|
Received: 18 April 2010
Revised: 25 April 2010
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
74.20.-z
|
(Theories and models of superconducting state)
|
|
74.25.Jb
|
(Electronic structure (photoemission, etc.))
|
|
74.50.+r
|
(Tunneling phenomena; Josephson effects)
|
|
74.72.-h
|
(Cuprate superconductors)
|
|
78.20.Ci
|
(Optical constants (including refractive index, complex dielectric constant, absorption, reflection and transmission coefficients, emissivity))
|
|
Cite this article:
Gholamreza Rashedi Effect of transparency on Josephson junction between s+g-wave superconductors 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 107303
|
[1] |
Cava R J, Takagi H, Batlogg B, Zandbergen H, Krajewski J J, Peck W F Jr, van DoverR B, Felder R J, Siegrist T and Mizuhashi K 1994 Nature 367 146
|
[2] |
Nagarajan R, Chandan Mazumdar, Zakir Hossain, Dhar S K, Gopalakrishnan K V, Gupta L C, Godart C, Padalia B D and Vijayaraghavan R 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 274
|
[3] |
Chu R M, Chen Q Y and Chu W K 2006 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 4085
|
[4] |
Won H, Yuan Q, Thalmeier P and Maki K 2003 Brazilian Journal of Physics 33 675
|
[5] |
Maki K, Thalmeier P and Won H 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 140502R
|
[6] |
Pairor P and Smith M F 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 4457
|
[7] |
Pairor P and Walker M B 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 064507
|
[8] |
Lee H C and Choi H Y 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 174530
|
[9] |
Muller K H and Narozhnyi V N 2001 Rep. Prog. Phys. 64 943
|
[10] |
Kamata K, Izawa K, Nakajima Y, Matsudaa Y, Watanabe T, Nohara M, Takagi H, Takeya H, Hirata K, Thalmeier P and Maki K 2003 Physica C 388--389 185
|
[11] |
Shevchenko S N 2005 Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 31 182 [Low Temp. Phys. 31 137]
|
[12] |
Kulik I O and Omelyanchouk A N 1978 Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 4 296 [Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 4 142]
|
[13] |
Rashedi G 2008 J. Phys.: Conference Series 97 012334
|
[14] |
Golubov A A, Kupriyanov M Y and Ilichev E 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 411
|
[15] |
Bulaevskii L N, Kuzii V V and Sobyanin A A 1977 Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 25 314 [JETP Lett. 25 290]
|
[16] |
Ryazanov V V, Oboznov V A, Rusanov A Y, Veretennikov A V, Golubov A A and Aarts J 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2427
|
[17] |
Veretennikov A V, Ryazanov V V, Oboznov V A, Rusanov A Y, Larkin V A and Aarts J 2000 Physica B 284--288 495
|
[18] |
Bergeret F S, Volkov A F and Efetov K B 2001 Phys. Rev. B 64 134506
|
[19] |
Tsuei C C and Kirtley J R 2000 Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 969
|
[20] |
Chtchelkatchev N M, Belzig W, Nazarov Y V and Bruder C 2001 Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 74 357 [JETP Lett. 74 323]
|
[21] |
Radovic Z, Lazarides N and Flytzanis N 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 014501
|
[22] |
Gumann A, Iniotakis C and Schopohl N 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 192502
|
[23] |
Brydon P M R and Manske D 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 147001
|
[24] |
Eilenberger G 1968 Z. Phys. 214 195
|
[25] |
Zaitsev A V 1984 JETP 59 1015
|
[26] |
Rashedi G and Kolesnichenko Y A 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 024516
|
[27] |
Belzig W, Wilhelm F K, Schon G, Bruder C and Zaikin A D 1999 Superlatt. Microstruct. 25 1251
|
[28] |
Rashedi G 2004 Superlatt. Microstruct. 35 155
|
[29] |
Amin M H S, Omelyanchouk A N, Rashkeev S N, Coury M and Zagoskin A M 2002 Physica B 318 162
|
[30] |
Bruder C 1990 Phys. Rev. B 41 4017
|
[31] |
Barash Y S, Galaktionov A V and Zaikin A D 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 665
|
[32] |
Mahmoodi R, Shevchenko S N and Kolesnichenko Y A 2002 Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 28 262 [Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 28 184]
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|