| PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection in complex multiple X-point configurations in an ancient solar-lunar terrestrial system |
| Xiang-Lei He(何向磊)1, Ao-Hua Mao(毛傲华)1,2,†, Meng-Meng Sun(孙萌萌)1, Ji-Tong Zou(邹继同)1, and Xiao-Gang Wang(王晓钢)1,2 |
1 School of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China;
2 Laboratory for Space Environment and Materials Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Magnetic reconnection processes in three-dimensional (3D) complex field configurations have been investigated in different magneto-plasma systems in space, laboratory, and astrophysical systems. Two-dimensional (2D) features of magnetic reconnection have been well developed and applied successfully to systems with symmetrical property, such as toroidal fusion plasmas and laboratory experiments with an axial symmetry. But in asymmetric systems, the 3D features are inevitably different from those in the 2D case. Magnetic reconnection structures in multiple celestial body systems, particularly star-planet-Moon systems, bring fresh insights to the understanding of the 3D geometry of reconnection. Thus, we take magnetic reconnection in an ancient solar-lunar terrestrial magneto-plasma system as an example by using its crucial parameters approximately estimated already and also some specific applications in pathways for energy and matter transports among Earth, ancient Moon, and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). Then, magnetic reconnection of the ancient lunar-terrestrial magnetospheres with the IMF is investigated numerically in this work. In a 3D simulation for the Earth-Moon-IMF system, topological features of complex magnetic reconnection configurations and dynamical characteristics of magnetic reconnection processes are studied. It is found that a coupled lunar-terrestrial magnetosphere is formed, and under various IMF orientations, multiple X-points emerge at distinct locations, showing three typical magnetic reconnection structures in such a geometry, i.e., the X-line, the triple current sheets, and the A-B null pairs. The results can conduce to further understanding of reconnection physics in 3D for plasmas in complex magnetic configurations, and also a possible mechanism for energy and matters transport in evolutions of similar astrophysical systems.
|
Received: 31 August 2023
Revised: 05 November 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 09 November 2023
|
|
PACS:
|
52.65.Kj
|
(Magnetohydrodynamic and fluid equation)
|
| |
94.30.cp
|
(Magnetic reconnection)
|
| |
96.12.Hg
|
(Magnetic field and magnetism)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11975087, 42261134533, and 42011530086), the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Energy Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFE03190400), and the Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program, China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Ao-Hua Mao
E-mail: aohuamao@hit.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xiang-Lei He(何向磊), Ao-Hua Mao(毛傲华), Meng-Meng Sun(孙萌萌), Ji-Tong Zou(邹继同), and Xiao-Gang Wang(王晓钢) Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection in complex multiple X-point configurations in an ancient solar-lunar terrestrial system 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 035202
|
[1] Yamada M, Kulsrud R and Ji H T 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 603
[2] Biskamp D 1996 Astrophys. Space Sci. 242 165
[3] Zweibel E G and Yamada M 2009 Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47 291
[4] Priest E R and Forbes T. 1986 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 91 5579
[5] Pritchett P L 2001 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 106 3783
[6] Lu Q M, Fu H S, Wang R S and Lu S 2022 Chin. Phys. B. 31 089401
[7] Comisso L and Bhattacharjee A 2016 J. Plasma Phys. 82 595820601
[8] Birn J, Drake J F, Shay M A, Rogers B N, Denton R E, Hesse M, Kuznetsova M, Ma Z W, Bhattacharjee A, Otto A and Pritchett P L 2001 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 106 3715
[9] Liu Y H, Hesse M, Guo F, Daughton W, Li H, Cassak P A and Shay M A 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 085101
[10] Torbert R B, Burch J L, Phan T D, et al. 2018 Science 362 1391
[11] Burch J L, Torbert R B, Phan T D, et al. 2016 Science 352 aaf2939
[12] Lee L C and Fu Z F 1986 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 91 6807
[13] Wang Z X, Wang X G, Dong J Q, Lei Y A, Long Y X, Mou Z Z and Qu W X 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 185004
[14] Pontin D I 2011 Adv. Space Res. 47 1508
[15] Guo R, Pu Z, Wang X, Xiao C and He J 2022 J J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 127 e2021JA030248
[16] Xiao C J, Wang X G, Pu Z Y, Ma Z W, Zhao H, Zhou G P, Wang J X, Kivelson M G, Fu S Y, Liu Z X, Zong Q G, Dunlop M W, Glassmeier K H, Lucek E, Reme H, Dandouras I and Escoubet C P 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 609
[17] Hale G E 1908 ApJ 28 315
[18] Beck R 2001 Space Sci. Rev. 99 243
[19] Zweibel E G and Heiles C 1997 Nature 385 131
[20] Lu Q M, Guo J, Lu S, Wang X Y, Slavin J A, Sun W J, Wang R S, Lin Y and Zhong J 2022 ApJ 937 1
[21] Ferrari C, Govoni F, Schindler S, Bykov A M and Rephaeli Y 2008 Space Sci. Rev. 134 93
[22] Ryu D, Schleicher D R, Treumann R A, Tsagas C G and Widrow L M 2012 Space Sci. Rev. 166 1
[23] Ji H, Yoo J, Fox W, Yamada M, Argall M, Egedal J, Liu Y H, Wilder R, Eriksson S, Daughton W, Bergstedt K, Bose S, Burch J, Torbert R, Ng J and Chen L J 2023 Space Sci. Rev. 219 76
[24] Mitchell D L, Halekas J S, Lin R P, Frey S, Hood L L, Acuña M H and Binder A 2008 Icarus 194 401
[25] Mighani S, Wang H, Shuster D L, Borlina C S, Nichols C I and Weiss B P 2020 Sci. Adv. 6 eaax0883
[26] Zharkov V N 2000 Solar System Res. 34 1
[27] Green J, Draper D, Boardsen S and Dong C 2020 Sci. Adv. 6 eabc0865
[28] Bingert S and Peter H 2011 Astron. Astrophys. 530 A112
[29] Groth C P, De Zeeuw, D L, Gombosi T I and Powell K G 2000 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 105 25053
[30] Ogino T A 1986 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 91 A6
[31] Tanaka T 1995 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 100 A7
[32] Dorelli J C and Bhattacharjee A 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 056504
[33] Li L 2021 AIP Adv. 4 11
[34] Cranmer S R 2017 ApJ 840 114
[35] Gold T 1959 J. Geophys. Res. 64 1219
[36] Parker E N 1957 J. Geophys. Res. 62 509
[37] Petschek H E 1964 NASA Spec Publ. 425
[38] Dahlburg R B and Karpen J T 1995 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 100 A12
[39] Wei L, Yu F and Wang Z X 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 012103
[40] Xiao C J, Wang X G, Pu Z Y, Zhao H, Wang J X, Ma Z W, Fu S Y, Kivelson M G, Liu Z X, Zong Q G, Glassmeier K H, Balogh A, Korth A, Reme H and Escoubet C P 2006 Nat. Phys. 2 478
[41] Xiao C J, Wang X G, Pu Z Y, Ma Z W, Zhao H, Zhou G P, Wang J X, Kivelson M G, Fu S Y, Liu Z X, Zong Q G, Dunlop M W, Glassmeier K H, Lucek E, Reme H, Dandouras I and Escoubet C P 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 609
[42] Lau Y T and Finn J M 1990 ApJ 350 672
[43] Greene J M 1988 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 93 8583
[44] Gastine T, Wicht J, Duarte L D V, Heimpel M and Becker A 2014 Geophys. Res. Lett. 41 5410
[45] Acuña M H, Ness N F and Connerney J E P 1980 J. Geophys. Res-Space Phys. 85 5675
[46] Jia X, Kivelson M G, Khurana K K and Walker R J 2010 Space Sci. Rev. 152 271 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
