|
|
Current-phase relations of a ring-trapped Bose-Einstein condensate with a weak link |
Xiu-Rong Zhang(张秀荣), Wei-Dong Li(李卫东) |
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China |
|
|
Abstract The current-phase relations of a ring-trapped Bose-Einstein condensate interrupted by a rotating rectangular barrier are extensively investigated with an analytical solution. A current-phase diagram, single and multi-valued relation, is presented with a rescaled barrier height and width. Our results show that the finite size makes the current-phase relation deviate a little bit from the cosine form for the soliton solution in the limit of a vanishing barrier, and the periodic boundary condition selects only the plane wave solution in the case of high barrier. The reason for multi-valued current-phase relation is given by investigating the behavior of soliton solution.
|
Received: 05 October 2018
Revised: 26 October 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.75.Lm
|
(Tunneling, Josephson effect, Bose-Einstein condensates in periodic potentials, solitons, vortices, and topological excitations)
|
|
47.37.+q
|
(Hydrodynamic aspects of superfluidity; quantum fluids)
|
|
74.50.+r
|
(Tunneling phenomena; Josephson effects)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11874247), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFA0304500 and 2017YFA0304203), PCSIRT, China (Grant No. IRT-17R70), and the Program of State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, China (Grant No. KF201703). |
Corresponding Authors:
Wei-Dong Li
E-mail: wdli@sxu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xiu-Rong Zhang(张秀荣), Wei-Dong Li(李卫东) Current-phase relations of a ring-trapped Bose-Einstein condensate with a weak link 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 010303
|
[1] |
Packard R E and Vitale S 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 3540
|
[2] |
Schwab K, Bruckner N and Packard R E 1997 Nature 386 585
|
[3] |
Simmonds R W, Marchenkov A, Hoskinson E, Davis J C and Packard R E 2001 Nature 412 55
|
[4] |
Hoskinson E, Sato Y, Hahn I and Packard R E 2006 Nat. Phys. 2 23
|
[5] |
Wright K C, Blakestad R B, Lobb C J, Phillips W D and Campbell G K 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 025302
|
[6] |
Piazza F, Collins L A and Smerzi A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 033613
|
[7] |
Leggett A J 2006 Quantum Liquids (NewYork: Oxford University)
|
[8] |
Ramanathan A, Wright K C, Muniz S R, Zelan M, Hill W T, Lobb C J, Helmerson K, Phillips W D and Campbell G K 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 130401
|
[9] |
Ryu C, Blackburn P W, Blinova A A and Boshier M G 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 205301
|
[10] |
Murray N, Krygier M, Edwards M, Wright K C, Campbell G K and Clark C W 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 053615
|
[11] |
Eckel S, Lee J G, Murray N, Clark C W, Lobb C J, Phillips W D, Edwards M and Campbell G K 2014 Nature 506 200
|
[12] |
Eckel S, Jendrzejewski F, Kumar A, Lobb C J and Campbell G K 2014 Phys. Rev. X 4 031052
|
[13] |
Piazza F, Collins L A and Smerzi A 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 021601(R)
|
[14] |
Mathey A C, Clark C W and Mathey L 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 023604
|
[15] |
Piazza F, Collins L A and Smerzi A 2011 New J. Phys. 13 043008
|
[16] |
Piazza F, Collins L A and Smerzi A 2013 J. Phys. B 46 095302
|
[17] |
Cominotti M, Rossini D, Rizzi M, Hekking F and Minguzzi A 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 025301
|
[18] |
Roussou A, Tsibidis G D, Smyrnakis J, Magiropoulos M, Efremidis N K, Jackson A D and Kavoulakis G M 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 023613
|
[19] |
Yakimenko A I, Bidasyuk Y M, Weyrauch M, Kuriatnikov Y I and Vilchinskii S I 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 033607
|
[20] |
Kunimi M and Kato Y 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 023832
|
[21] |
Mateo A M, Gallemi A, Guilleumas M and Mayol R 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 063625
|
[22] |
Syafwan M, Kevrekidis P, Paris-Mandoki A, Lesanovsky I, Kruger P, Hackermuller L and Susanto H 2015 arXiv:1512.07924 [condmat.quant-gas]
|
[23] |
Li Y, Pang W and Malomed B A 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 023832
|
[24] |
Kanamoto R, Carr L D and Ueda M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 060401
|
[25] |
Zhang X R, Piazza F, Li W D and Smerzi A 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 063601
|
[26] |
Li W D 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 063612
|
[27] |
Li W D and Smerzi A 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 016605
|
[28] |
Zhang X R and Li W D 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 070311
|
[29] |
Kumar A, Eckel S, Jendrzejewski F and Campbell G K 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 021602
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|