Special Issue:
SPECIAL TOPIC — Soft matter and biological physics
|
SPECIAL TOPIC—Soft matter and biological physics |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Derivation of persistent time for anisotropic migration of cells |
Yan-Ping Liu(刘艳平)1, Xiao-Cui Zhang(张晓翠)1, Yu-Ling Wu(吴宇宁)1, Wen Liu(刘雯)1, Xiang Li(李翔)1,2, Ru-Chuan Liu(刘如川)3, Li-Yu Liu(刘雳宇)3, Jian-Wei Shuai(帅建伟)1,2,4 |
1. Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China;
3. College of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China;
4. Research Institute for Biomimetics and Soft Matter, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Soft Functional Materials Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China |
|
|
Abstract Cell migration plays an essential role in a wide variety of physiological and pathological processes. In this paper we numerically discuss the properties of an anisotropic persistent random walk (APRW) model, in which two different and independent persistent times are assumed for cell migrations in the x-and y-axis directions. An intrinsic orthogonal coordinates with the primary and non-primary directions can be defined for each migration trajectory based on the singular vector decomposition method. Our simulation results show that the decay time of single exponential distribution of velocity auto-correlation function (VACF) in the primary direction is actually the large persistent time of the APRW model, and the small decay time of double exponential VACF in the non-primary direction equals the small persistent time of the APRW model. Thus, we propose that the two persistent times of anisotropic migration of cells can be properly estimated by discussing the VACFs of trajectory projected to the primary and non-primary directions.
|
Received: 05 September 2017
Revised: 15 September 2017
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
87.17.Aa
|
(Modeling, computer simulation of cell processes)
|
|
05.40.Fb
|
(Random walks and Levy flights)
|
|
87.19.xj
|
(Cancer)
|
|
05.10.Gg
|
(Stochastic analysis methods)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31370830, 11675134, 11474345, and 11604030), the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (Grant No. 2013CB837200), the 111 Project, China (Grant No. B16029), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016M602071). |
Corresponding Authors:
Jian-Wei Shuai
E-mail: jianweishuai@xmu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yan-Ping Liu(刘艳平), Xiao-Cui Zhang(张晓翠), Yu-Ling Wu(吴宇宁), Wen Liu(刘雯), Xiang Li(李翔), Ru-Chuan Liu(刘如川), Li-Yu Liu(刘雳宇), Jian-Wei Shuai(帅建伟) Derivation of persistent time for anisotropic migration of cells 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 128707
|
[1] |
Douglas A Lauffenburger and Alan F Horwitz 1996 Cell 84 359
|
[2] |
Anne J Ridley, Martin A Schwartz, Keith Burridge, Richard A Firtel, Mark H Ginsberg, Gary Borisy, Thomas Parsons J and Alan Rick Horwitz 2003 Science 302 1704
|
[3] |
Mccann C, Kriebel P, Parent C A and Losert W 2010 J. Cell Sci. 123 1724
|
[4] |
Dang I, Gorelik R, Sousablin C, et al. 2013 Nature 5037475
|
[5] |
Peter Friedl and Darren Gilmour 2009 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biology 10 445
|
[6] |
Berg H C 1983 Physics Today 4073
|
[7] |
Uhlenbeck G E and Ornstein L S 1930 Phys. Rev. 36 823
|
[8] |
Tajie H Harris, Edward J Banigan, David A Christian, et al. 2012 Nature 486545
|
[9] |
András Czirók, Katalin Schlett, Emília Madarász and Tamás Vicsek 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3038
|
[10] |
Upadhyaya A, Rieu J P, Glazier J A and Sawada Y 2001 Physica A 293 549
|
[11] |
Selmeczi D, Mosler S, Hagedorn P H, Larsen N B and Flyvbjerg H 2005 Biophys. J. 89 912
|
[12] |
Driscoll M K and Danuser G 2015 Trends in Cell Biology 25 749
|
[13] |
Liyu Liu, Guillaume Duclos, Bo Sun, et al. 2013 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1101686
|
[14] |
Jiangrui Zhu, Long Liang, Yang Jiao and Liyu Liu 2015 PLOS One 10 e0118058
|
[15] |
Wu P, Giri A, Sun S X and Wirtz D 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 3949
|
[16] |
Wu P, Giri A and Wirtz D 2015 Nature Protocols 10 517
|
[17] |
Metzler R and Klafter J 2000 Phys. Rep. 3391-77
|
[18] |
Mandelbrot B B and Van Ness J W 2006 Siam Review 10422
|
[19] |
Stokes C L, Lauffenburger D A and Williams S K 1991 J. Cell Sci. 99419
|
[20] |
Campos D, Mendez V and Llopis I 2010 J. Theor. Biology 267 526
|
[21] |
Li L, Cox E C and Flyvbjerg H 2011 Physical Biology 8 046006
|
[22] |
Höfling F and Franosch T 2013 Rep. Prog. Phys. 76 046602
|
[23] |
Zaburdaev V, Denisov S and Klafter J 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 483
|
[24] |
Maiuri P, Rupprecht J, Wieser S, et al. 2015 Cell 161 374
|
[25] |
Baumann K 2015 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biology 16267
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|