INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Accuracy and effectiveness of self-gating signals in free-breathing three-dimensional cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging |
Shuo Li(李硕)1,3, Lei Wang(王磊)2, Yan-Chun Zhu(朱艳春)3,4, Jie Yang(杨洁)3, Yao-Qin Xie(谢耀钦)3, Nan Fu(付楠)3, Yi Wang(王乙)4, Song Gao(高嵩)1 |
1. Medical Imaging Physics Laboratory, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, People's Hospital of Luohu, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518001, China;
3. Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China;
4. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA |
|
|
Abstract Conventional multiple breath-hold two-dimensional (2D) balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) presents many difficulties in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recently, a self-gated free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) SSFP technique has been proposed as an alternative in many studies. However, the accuracy and effectiveness of self-gating signals have been barely studied before. Since self-gating signals are crucially important in image reconstruction, a systematic study of self-gating signals and comparison with external monitored signals are needed. Previously developed self-gated free-breathing 3D SSFP techniques are used on twenty-eight healthy volunteers. Both electrocardiographic (ECG) and respiratory bellow signals are also acquired during the scan as external signals. Self-gating signal and external signal are compared by trigger and gating window. Gating window is proposed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of respiratory self-gating signal. Relative deviation of the trigger and root-mean-square-deviation of the cycle duration are calculated. A two-tailed paired t-test is used to identify the difference between self-gating and external signals. A Wilcoxon signed rank test is used to identify the difference between peak and valley self-gating triggers. The results demonstrate an excellent correlation (P=0, R>0.99) between self-gating and external triggers. Wilcoxon signed rank test shows that there is no significant difference between peak and valley self-gating triggers for both cardiac (H=0, P>0.10) and respiratory (H=0, P>0.44) motions. The difference between self-gating and externally monitored signals is not significant (two-tailed paired-sample t-test:H=0, P>0.90). The self-gating signals could demonstrate cardiac and respiratory motion accurately and effectively as ECG and respiratory bellow. The difference between the two methods is not significant and can be explained. Furthermore, few ECG trigger errors appear in some subjects while these errors are not found in self-gating signals.
|
Received: 19 May 2016
Revised: 17 August 2016
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
87.61.-c
|
(Magnetic resonance imaging)
|
|
87.57.-s
|
(Medical imaging)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81501463, 61471349, 81671853, 81571669, and 61671026), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2015AA043203), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China (Grant No. 7162112), Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program of China (Grant No. 2011S013), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant Nos. 2014A030310360 and 2014A0202015028), the Beijing Center for Mathematics and Information Interdisciplinary Sciences, Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program, China (Grant Nos. JCYJ201500731154850923 and JCYJ20140417113430665), Shenzhen High-level Oversea Talent Program, China (Grant No. KQJSCX20160301144248), and the Nanshan Technology Research Fund, China (Grant No. KC2014JSQN0001A). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yan-Chun Zhu
E-mail: yc.zhu@siat.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Shuo Li(李硕), Lei Wang(王磊), Yan-Chun Zhu(朱艳春), Jie Yang(杨洁), Yao-Qin Xie(谢耀钦), Nan Fu(付楠), Yi Wang(王乙), Song Gao(高嵩) Accuracy and effectiveness of self-gating signals in free-breathing three-dimensional cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 128703
|
[1] |
Thattaliyath B D, Forsha D E, Stewart C, Barker P C A and Campbell M J 2015 Congenit Heart Dis. 10 371
|
[2] |
Ingle R R, Santos J M, Overall W R, McConnell M V, Hu B S and Nishimura D G 2015 Magnet. Reson. Med. 73 1764
|
[3] |
Elnakib A, Beache G M, Gimel'farb G and El-Baz A 2015 Int. J. Comput. Ass. Rad. 10 1299
|
[4] |
Saranathan M, Bayram E, Worters P W and Glockner J F 2012 Magn. Reson. Imaging 30 158
|
[5] |
Ng W H, Chan Y L, Sung J Y, Lee Y T, Lee S F and Chung S S C 2004 Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 16 211
|
[6] |
Peters D C, Ennis D B, Rohatgi P, Syed M A, McVeigh E R and Arai A E 2004 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 20 411
|
[7] |
Makowski M R, Wiethoff A J, Jansen C H P, Uribe S, Parish V, Schuster A, Botnar R M, Bell A, Kiesewetter C, Razavi R, Schaeffter T and Greil G F 2012 J. Cardiovasc. Magn. R 14 1
|
[8] |
Jeong D, Schiebler M L, Lai P, Wang K, Vigen K K and Francois C J 2015 Int. J. Cardiovas. Imag. 31 851
|
[9] |
Larson A C, White R D, Laub G, McVeigh E R, Li D B and Simonetti O P 2004 Magnet. Reson. Med. 51 93
|
[10] |
Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Achenbach S, Schnackenburg B, Gebker R, Fleck E and Nagel E 2006 Radiology 239 71
|
[11] |
Palmucci S, Mauro L A, Coppolino M, Musumeci A G, Foti P V, Milone P and Ettorre G C 2010 Radiol. Med. 115 467
|
[12] |
Sievers B, Schrader S, Rehwald W, Hunold P, Barkhausen J and Erbel R 2011 Acta Cardiol. 66 349
|
[13] |
Sievers B, Schrader S, Hunold P, Barkhausen J and Erbel R 2011 Acta Cardiologica. 66 489
|
[14] |
Chen G J, Zhang Y J and Yang Y S 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 124703
|
[15] |
Liu J, Nguyen T D, Zhu Y C, Spincemaille P, Prince M R, Weinsaft J W, Saloner D and Wang Y 2014 Plos One 9 e89315
|
[16] |
Liu J, Spincemaille P, Codella N C, Nguyen T D, Prince M R and Wang Y 2010 Magn. Reson. Med. 63 1230
|
[17] |
Zhu Y C, Liu J, Weinsaft J, Spincemaille P, Nguyen T D, Prince M R, Bao S L, Xie Y Q and Wang Y 2015 Biomed. Res. Int. 2015 819102
|
[18] |
Spincemaille P, Liu J, Nguyen T, Prince M R and Wang Y 2011 Magn. Reson. Imaging 29 861
|
[19] |
Tibiletti M, Paul J, Bianchi A, Wundrak S, Rottbauer W, Stiller D and Rasche V 2015 Magn. Reson. Med. 75 1324
|
[20] |
Wundrak S, Paul J, Ulrici J, Hell E, Geibel M A, Bernhardt P, Rottbauer W and Rasche V 2015 Magn. Reson. Med. 76 919
|
[21] |
Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, Von Aspern K, Lucke C, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S, Kempfert J, Haensig M, Rastan A, Walther T, Mohr F W and Gutberlet M 2013 Int. J. Cardiovas. Imag. 29 693
|
[22] |
Zhang J M, Guan Q, Tang L M, Liu T B, Liu H X, Huang X L and Si J F 2014 Chin. Phys B 23 018701
|
[23] |
Reis M S, Deus A P, Simoes R P, Aniceto I A V, Catai A M and Borghi-Silva A 2010 Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 14 106
|
[24] |
Ovchinnikiv K 2007 Psychophysiology 44 S49
|
[25] |
Elstad M, Walloe L, Holme N L A, Maes E and Thoresen M 2015 Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 115 521
|
[26] |
Efimova E, Doering M, Richter S, Dinov B, Sommer P, Bollmann A, Fischer J, Garbade J, Hindricks G and Arya A 2015 Eur. Heart. J. 36 57
|
[27] |
Avitall B and Kalinski A 2015 Heart Rhythm. 12 2195
|
[28] |
Li W G, Zhang Z L, Li K A, Jin N, Zhang Y, Zhang T J, Miller F H and Larson A C 2015 Magnet. Reson. Med. 73 2249
|
[29] |
Jin N, Zhang Z L, Zhang L J, Lu G M and Larson A C 2011 Magnet. Reson. Med. 66 207
|
[30] |
Usman M, Atkinson D, Kolbitsch C, Schaeffter T and Prieto C 2015 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 41 1521
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|