|
|
Singularities of noncompact charged objects |
M. Sharif, G. Abbas |
Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore-54590, Pakistan |
|
|
Abstract We formulate a model of noncompact spherical charged objects in the framework of noncommutative field theory. The Einstein–Maxwell field equations are solved with charged anisotropic fluid. We choose matter and charge densities as functions of two parameters instead of defining these quantities in terms of Gaussian distribution function. It is found that the corresponding densities and the Ricci scalar are singular at origin, whereas the metric is nonsingular, indicating a spacelike singularity. The numerical solution of the horizon equation implies that there are two or one or no horizon(s) depending on the mass. We also evaluate the Hawking temperature, and find that a black hole with two horizons is evaporated to an extremal black hole with one horizon.
|
Received: 06 June 2012
Revised: 25 September 2012
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
04.20.Cv
|
(Fundamental problems and general formalism)
|
|
04.20.Dw
|
(Singularities and cosmic censorship)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan through the Indigenous Ph.D. 5000 Fellowship Program Batch-IV. |
Corresponding Authors:
M. Sharif
E-mail: msharif.math@pu.edu.pk
|
Cite this article:
M. Sharif, G. Abbas Singularities of noncompact charged objects 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 030401
|
[1] |
Padmanabhan T 2005 Phys. Rep. 406 49
|
[2] |
Susskind L 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2367
|
[3] |
Witten E 1996 Nucl. Phys. B 460 335
|
[4] |
Siberg N and Witten E 1999 JHEP 1999 032
|
[5] |
Snyder S H 1947 Phys. Rev. 71 38
|
[6] |
Zade S S, Patil K D and Mohod A D 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 854
|
[7] |
Nashed G G L 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 3059
|
[8] |
Doplicer S, Fredenhagen K and Robert J E 1995 Commun. Math. Phys. 172 187
|
[9] |
Guang C 2001 Chin. Phys. 10 787
|
[10] |
Nicolimi P, Smailagic A and Spallucci E 2006 Phys. Lett. B 632 547
|
[11] |
Smailagic A and Spallucci E 2003 J. Phys. A 36 467
|
[12] |
Doplicer S, Fredenhagen K and Robert J E 1995 Commun. Math. Phys. 172 187
|
[13] |
Banerjee R, Majhi R B and Modak S K 2009 Class. Quantum Grav. 26 085010
|
[14] |
Modesto L and Nicolini P 2010 Phys. Rev. D 82 104035
|
[15] |
Bastos C, Bertolami O, Dias N C and Prata J N 2009 Phys. Rev. D 80 124038
|
[16] |
Bastos C, Bertolami O, Dias N C and Prata J N 2011 Phys. Rev. D 84 024005
|
[17] |
Bertolami O and Zaro C D A 2010 Phys. Rev. D 81 025005
|
[18] |
Oh J J and Park C 2010 JHEP 1003 86
|
[19] |
Sharif M and Abbas G 2012 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81 044002
|
[20] |
Sun W, Wang D, Xie N Q, Zhang R B and Zhang X 2010 Eur. Phys. J. C 69 271
|
[21] |
Castro C 2008 Phys. Lett. B 665 384
|
[22] |
Ansoldi S, Nicolimi P, Smailagic A and Spallucci E 2007 Phys. Lett. B 645 261
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|