|
|
Design of an adaptive finite-time controller for synchronization of two identical/different non-autonomous chaotic flywheel governor systems |
Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa† |
Electrical Engineering Department, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran |
|
|
Abstract The centrifugal flywheel governor (CFG) is a mechanical device that automatically controls the speed of an engine and avoids the damage caused by sudden change of load torque. It has been shown that this system exhibits very rich and complex dynamics such as chaos. This paper investigates the problem of robust finite-time synchronization of non-autonomous chaotic CFGs. The effects of unknown parameters, model uncertainties and external disturbances are fully taken into account. First, it is assumed that the parameters of both master and slave CFGs have the same value and a suitable adaptive finite-time controller is designed. Second, two CFGs are synchronized with the parameters of different values via a robust adaptive finite-time control approach. Finally, some numerical simulations are used to demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed finite-time controllers.
|
Received: 23 July 2011
Revised: 17 August 2011
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
05.45.-a
|
(Nonlinear dynamics and chaos)
|
|
05.45.Xt
|
(Synchronization; coupled oscillators)
|
|
05.45.Gg
|
(Control of chaos, applications of chaos)
|
|
05.45.Pq
|
(Numerical simulations of chaotic systems)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa,m.p.aghababa@ee.uut.ac.ir; m.pour13@gmail.com
E-mail: m.p.aghababa@ee.uut.ac.ir; m.pour13@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa Design of an adaptive finite-time controller for synchronization of two identical/different non-autonomous chaotic flywheel governor systems 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 030502
|
[1] |
Curran P F and Chua L O 1997 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 7 1357
|
[2] |
Pourmahmood M, Khanmohammadi S and Alizadeh G 2011 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 16 2853
|
[3] |
Aghababa M P, Khanmohammadi S and Alizadeh G 2011 Appl. Math. Model. 35 3080
|
[4] |
L? L, Li G, Guo L, Meng L, Zou J R and Yang M 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 080507
|
[5] |
Liu Y Z, Jiang C S, Lin C S and Jiang Y M 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 660
|
[6] |
Li G H, Zhou S P and Xu D M 2004 Chin. Phys. 13 168
|
[7] |
Chen F X and Zhang W D 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 937
|
[8] |
Zhang X Y, Guan X P and Li H G 2005 Chin. Phys. B 14 279
|
[9] |
Hu J and Zhang Q J 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 503
|
[10] |
Yu W, Chen G and L? J 2009 Automatica 45 429
|
[11] |
Yu W, Cao J, Chen G, L? J, Han J and Wei W 2009 IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. 39 230
|
[12] |
Yu W, Cao J and L? J 2008 SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 7 108
|
[13] |
Zhou J, Lu J and L? J 2008 Automatica 44 996
|
[14] |
Zhang Q, Lu J, L? J and Tse C K 2008 IEEE Trans. Circuit. Syst. 55 183
|
[15] |
Zhou J, Lu J and L? J 2006 IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 51 652
|
[16] |
L? J and Chen G 2005 IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 50 841
|
[17] |
Aghababa M P 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 090505
|
[18] |
Chen Y, Wu X and Gui Z 2010 Appl. Math. Model. 34 4161
|
[19] |
Yang T and Chua L O 2000 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 15 859
|
[20] |
Salarieh H and Alasty A 2008 J. Sound Vibr. 313 760
|
[21] |
Cai J P, Wu X F and Chen S H 2007 Phys. Scripta 75 379
|
[22] |
Yoo W, Ji D and Won S 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 1354
|
[23] |
Chen Y, Wu X and Liu Z 2009 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 42 1197
|
[24] |
Beltrami E 1987 Mathematics for Dynamic Modeling (Academic Press: Boston)
|
[25] |
Abno S and Hata Y 1981 Microprocess. Microsys. 5 451
|
[26] |
Ge Z M, Yang H S, Chen H H and Chen H K 1999 Int. J. Eng. Sci. 37 921
|
[27] |
Zhang J G, Li X F, Chu Y D, Yu J N and Chang Y X 2009 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 39 2150
|
[28] |
Zhang J G, Yu J N, Chu Y D, Li X F and Chang Y X 2008 Simulat. Model. Pract. Theory 16 1588
|
[29] |
Sotomayor J, Mello L F and Braga D C 2008 Nonlinear Anal. RWA 9 889
|
[30] |
Ge Z M and Jhuang W R 2007 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 33 270
|
[31] |
Ge Z M and Lee C I 2003 J. Sound Vibr. 262 845
|
[32] |
Ge Z M and Lee C I 2005 J. Sound Vibr. 282 635
|
[33] |
Ge Z M and Lee C I 2005 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 23 1855
|
[34] |
Zhang H, Huang W, Wang Z and Chai T 2006 Phys. Lett. A 350 363
|
[35] |
L? J, Han F, Yu X and Chen G 2004 Automatica 40 1677
|
[36] |
L? J, Chen G, Yu X and Leung H 2004 IEEE Trans. Circuit. Syst. 51 2476
|
[37] |
Yu S, L? J, Leung H and Chen G 2005 IEEE Trans. Circuit. Syst. 52 1459
|
[38] |
L? J and Chen G 2006 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 16 775
|
[39] |
L? J, Yu S, Leung H and Chen G 2006 IEEE Trans. Circuit. Syst. 53 149
|
[40] |
Yu S, L? J and Chen G 2007 IEEE Trans. Circuit. Syst. 54 2087
|
[41] |
Wang H, Han Z Z, Xie Q Y and Zhang W 2009 Nonlinear Anal. RWA 10 2842
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|