|
|
|
Discreet investors exert greater influence on cooperation in the public goods game |
| Hong-Wei Kang(康洪炜)1, Zhan-Yao Jin(金展瑶)1, Ming-Yuan Li(李明远)1, Mie Wang(旺咩)2, Xing-Ping Sun(孙兴平)1, Yong Shen(沈勇)1, and Qing-Yi Chen(陈清毅)1,† |
1 School of Software, Yunnan University, Kunming 650000, China;
2 College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper studies the evolutionary process of cooperative behavior in a public goods game model with heterogeneous investment strategies in square lattices. In the proposed model, players are divided into defectors, cooperators and discreet investors. Among these, defectors do not participate in investing, discreet investors make heterogeneous investments based on the investment behavior and cooperation value of their neighbors, and cooperators invest equally in each neighbor. In real life, heterogeneous investment is often accompanied by time or economic costs. The discreet investors in this paper pay a certain price to obtain their neighbors' investment behavior and cooperation value, which quantifies the time and economic costs of the heterogeneous investment process. The results of Monte Carlo simulation experiments in this study show that discreet investors can effectively resist the invasion of the defectors, form a stable cooperative group and expand the cooperative advantage in evolution. However, when discreet investors pay too high a price, they lose their strategic advantage. The results in this paper help us understand the role of heterogeneous investment in promoting and maintaining human social cooperation.
|
Received: 20 April 2023
Revised: 30 August 2023
Accepted manuscript online: 07 October 2023
|
|
PACS:
|
02.50.Le
|
(Decision theory and game theory)
|
| |
02.50.Ng
|
(Distribution theory and Monte Carlo studies)
|
| |
02.60.Cb
|
(Numerical simulation; solution of equations)
|
| |
02.70.Uu
|
(Applications of Monte Carlo methods)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Software Engineering of Yunnan Province (Grant Nos. 2020SE308 and 2020SE309). |
Corresponding Authors:
Qing-Yi Chen
E-mail: devas9@ynu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Hong-Wei Kang(康洪炜), Zhan-Yao Jin(金展瑶), Ming-Yuan Li(李明远), Mie Wang(旺咩), Xing-Ping Sun(孙兴平), Yong Shen(沈勇), and Qing-Yi Chen(陈清毅) Discreet investors exert greater influence on cooperation in the public goods game 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 030203
|
[1] Kerr N L and Bruun S E 1983 Journal of Personality Social Psychology 44 78
[2] Albanese R and Van Fleet D D 1985 Academy of Management Review 10 244
[3] Krishnan R, Smith M D, Tang Z and Telang R 37 th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004, p. 10
[4] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2010 Europhys. Lett. 92 38003
[5] Apesteguia J and Maier-Rigaud F P 2006 Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 646
[6] Gardner R, Ostrom E and Walker J M 1990 Rationality Society 2 335
[7] Weimann J 1994 Journal of Public Economics 54 185
[8] Kollock P 1998 Annual Review of Sociology 24 183
[9] Hauert C 2006 Advances in Complex Systems 9 315
[10] Axelrod R and Dion D 1988 Science 242 1385
[11] Axelrod R and Hamilton W D 1981 Science 211 1390
[12] Nowak M A, Sasaki A, Taylor C and Fudenberg D 2004 Nature 428 646
[13] Rand D G and Nowak M A 2013 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 413
[14] Nowak M and Highfield R 2011 Zygon 46 4
[15] Fu F, Chen X, Liu L and Wang L 2007 Phys. Lett. A 371 58
[16] Szolnoki A, Xie N G, Ye Y and Perc M 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 042805
[17] Nowak M A 2006 Science 314 1560
[18] Nowak M A and May R M 1993 International Journal of Bifurcation Chaos 3 35
[19] Michod R E 1982 Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13 23
[20] Eberhard M J W 1975 The Quarterly Review of Biology 50 1
[21] Van Veelen M, García J, Rand D G and Nowak M A 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 9929
[22] Trivers R L 1971 Quarterly Review of Biology 46 35
[23] Righi S and Takács K 2018 Scientific Reports 8 11149
[24] Nowak M A and Sigmund K 2005 Nature 437 1291
[25] Boyd R and Richerson P J 1989 Social Networks 11 213
[26] Smith J M 1976 Group selection (Stony Brook Foundation, Inc.)
[27] Wilson D S 1975 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72 143
[28] Floría L M, Gracia-Lázaro C, Gómez-Gardenes J and Moreno Y 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 026106
[29] Chen M H, Wang L, Sun S W, Wang J and Xia C Y 2016 Phys. Lett. A 380 40
[30] Ma X, Quan J and Wang X 2021 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 152 111353
[31] Hauert C 2010 Journal of Theoretical Biology 267 22
[32] Santos F P, Santos F C and Pacheco J M 2018 Nature 555 242
[33] Shen Y, Yin W, Kang H, Zhang H and Wang M 2022 Phys. Lett. A 428 127935
[34] Wang M, Kang H, Shen Y, Sun X and Chen Q 2021 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 152 111395
[35] Szolnoki A and Chen X 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 052316
[36] Helbing D, Szolnoki A, Perc M and Szab 2010 New J. Phys. 12 083005
[37] Boyd R and Richerson P J 1992 Ethology Sociobiology 13 171
[38] Li X, Jusup M, Wang Z, Li H, Shi L, Podobnik B, Stanley H E, Havlin S and Boccaletti S 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 30
[39] Fowler J H 2005 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 7047
[40] Ohdaira T 2017 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 95 77
[41] Yu T, Chen S H and Li H 2016 Journal of Economic Interaction Coordination 11 313
[42] Li M, Kang H, Sun X, Shen Y and Chen Q 2022 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 164 112747
[43] Chen Q, Chen T and Yang R 2019 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 120 67
[44] Sasaki T and Uchida S 2014 Biology Letters 10 20130903
[45] Sasaki T and Unemi T 2011 Journal of Theoretical Biology 287 109
[46] Wang Q, Wang H, Zhang Z, Li Y, Liu Y and Perc M 2018 Physica A 502 570
[47] Cao X B, Du W B and Rong Z H 2010 Physica A 389 1273
[48] Zhang L, Xie Y, Huang C, Li H and Dai Q 2020 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 133 109675
[49] Zhang H, Shi D, Liu R and Wang B 2012 Physica A 391 2617
[50] Meloni S, Xia C Y and Moreno Y 2017 Royal Society Open Science 4 170092
[51] Zwick E and Mahon J 2017 American Economic Review 107 217
[52] Ma X, Quan J and Wang X 2021 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 152 111353
[53] Shim G Y, Lee S H and Kim Y M 2008 Journal of Business Research 61 47
[54] Cartwright E 2024 Behavioral economics (Routledge)
[55] Pager D 2003 American Journal of Sociology 108 937
[56] Ziff R M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 045701
[57] Szolnoki A, Perc M and Szabó G 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 056109 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
