|
|
|
Reputational preference and other-regarding preference based rewarding mechanism promotes cooperation in spatial social dilemmas |
| Huayan Pei(裴华艳)1, Guanghui Yan(闫光辉)1,†, and Huanmin Wang(王焕民)2 |
1 School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2 Mechatronics T&R Institute, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To study the incentive mechanisms of cooperation, we propose a preference rewarding mechanism in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game, which simultaneously considers reputational preference, other-regarding preference and the dynamic adjustment of vertex weight. The vertex weight of a player is adaptively adjusted according to the comparison result of his own reputation and the average reputation value of his immediate neighbors. Players are inclined to pay a personal cost to reward the cooperative neighbor with the greatest vertex weight. The vertex weight of a player is proportional to the preference rewards he can obtain from direct neighbors. We find that the preference rewarding mechanism significantly facilitates the evolution of cooperation, and the dynamic adjustment of vertex weight has powerful effect on the emergence of cooperative behavior. To validate multiple effects, strategy distribution and the average payoff and fitness of players are discussed in a microcosmic view.
|
Received: 09 October 2020
Revised: 05 November 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 02 December 2020
|
|
PACS:
|
02.50.Le
|
(Decision theory and game theory)
|
| |
87.23.Ge
|
(Dynamics of social systems)
|
| |
87.23.Kg
|
(Dynamics of evolution)
|
| |
07.05.Tp
|
(Computer modeling and simulation)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62062049), the Social Science Project of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 20YJCZH212), and the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China (Grant No. 20JR5RA390). |
Corresponding Authors:
Guanghui Yan
E-mail: yanghacademic@163.com
|
Cite this article:
Huayan Pei(裴华艳), Guanghui Yan(闫光辉), and Huanmin Wang(王焕民) Reputational preference and other-regarding preference based rewarding mechanism promotes cooperation in spatial social dilemmas 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 050203
|
[1] Rand D G and Nowak M A 2013 Trends Cogn. Sci. 17 413
[2] Hardin G 2009 J. Natural Resources Policy Research 1 243
[3] Perc M 2016 Phys. Lett. A 380 2803
[4] Ostrom E, Burger J, Field C B, Norgaard R B and Policansky D 1999 Science 284 278
[5] Axelrod R and Hamilton W D 1981 Science 211 1390
[6] Smith J M 1982 Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[7] Weibull J W 1997 Evolutionary Game Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
[8] Gintis H and others 2000 Game Theory Evolving (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
[9] Turner P E and Chao L 1999 Nature 398 441
[10] Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R and Fehr E 2003 Evol. Hum. Behav. 24 153
[11] Doebeli M and Hauert C 2005 Ecol. Lett. 8 748
[12] Nowak M A and Sigmund K 2004 Science 303 793
[13] Macy M W and Flache A 2002 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 7229
[14] Santos F C, Pacheco J M and Lenaerts T 2006 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 3490
[15] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2009 Europhys. Lett. 86 30007
[16] Zimmermann M G and Eguíluz V M 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 056118
[17] Szolnoki A and Szabó G 2007 Europhys. Lett. 77 30004
[18] Perc M and Szolnoki A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 011904
[19] Sefton M, Shupp R and Walker J M 2007 Econ. Inq. 45 671
[20] Rand D G, Dreber A, Ellingsen T, Fudenberg D and Nowak M A 2009 Science 325 1272
[21] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2010 Europhys. Lett. 92 38003
[22] Hauert C and Doebeli M 2004 Nature 428 643
[23] Du W B, Cao X B, Hu M B and Wang W X 2009 Europhys. Lett. 87 60004
[24] Souza M O, Pacheco J M and Santos F C 2009 J. Theor. Biol. 260 581
[25] Nowak M A and May R M 1992 Nature 359 826
[26] Shen C, Chu C, Guo H, Shi L and Duan J Y 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 1
[27] Nowak M A and May R M 1998 Nature 393 573
[28] Fu F, Hauert C, Nowak M A and Wang L 2008 Phys. Rev. E 78 026117
[29] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2008 New J. Phys. 10 043036
[30] Szolnoki A and Perc M 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 041027
[31] Wang Z, Xu Z J, Huang J H and Zhang L Z 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 100204
[32] Wang W X, Ren J, Chen G and Wang B H 2006 Phys. Rev. E 74 056113
[33] Li Y, Zhang J and Perc M 2018 Appl. Math. Comput. 320 437
[34] Li Y, Wang H, Du W, Perc M, Cao X and Zhang J 2019 Physica A 521 248
[35] Wang X J and Chen W M 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 080201
[36] Wang J, He J, Yu F, Chen W, Wang R and Yu K 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 108703
[37] Liu A Z, Zhang Y L and Sun C Y 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 098901
[38] Nowak M A 2006 Science 314 1560
[39] Nowak M A and Sigmund K 1998 Nature 393 573
[40] Nowak M A and Sigmund K 2005 Nature 437 1291
[41] Nowak M A and Sigmund K 1998 J. Theor. Biol. 194 561
[42] Leimar O and Hammerstein P 2001 Proc. Roy. Soc. B 268 745
[43] Sztompka P 1999 Trust: A Sociological Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[44] Milinski M, Semmann D and Krambeck H J 2002 Nature 415 424
[45] Wedekind C and Braithwaite V A 2002 Curr. Biol. 12 1012
[46] Barclay P 2004 Evol. Hum. Behav. 25 209
[47] Grafen A 1979 Anim. Behav. 27 905
[48] Taylor C and Nowak M A 2007 Evolution 61 2281
[49] Bo X Y 2010 Physica A 389 1105
[50] Szabo G and Szolnoki A 2012 J. Theor. Biol. 299 81
[51] Chen M H, Wang L, Sun S W, Wang J and Xia C Y 2016 Phys. Lett. A 380 40
[52] Li X P, Sun S W and Xia C Y 2019 Appl. Math. Comput. 361 810
[53] Andreoni J, Harbaugh W and Vesterlund L 2003 Am. Econ. Rev. 93 893
[54] Szabó G and Töke C 1998 Phys. Rev. E 58 69
[55] Nowak M A and May R M 1993 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 3 35
[56] Wang Z, Szolnoki A and Perc M 2014 New J. Phys. 16 033041
[57] Huang K, Zheng X, Li Z and Yang Y 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 14783 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
