ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Analysis of dark soliton generation in the microcavity with mode-interaction |
Xin Xu(徐昕)†, Xueying Jin(金雪莹), Jie Cheng(程杰), Haoran Gao(高浩然), Yang Lu(陆洋), and Liandong Yu(于连栋) |
School of Instrument Science and Opto-electronics Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China |
|
|
Abstract Mode-interaction plays an important role in the dark soliton generation in the microcavity. It is beneficial to the excitation of dark solitons, but also facilitates a variety of dark soliton states. Based on the non-normalized Lugiato-Lefever equation, the evolution of dark soliton in the microcavity with mode-interaction is investigated. By means of mode-interaction, the initial continuous wave (CW) field evolves into a dark soliton gradually, and the spectrum expands from a single mode to a broadband comb. After changing the mode-interaction parameters, the original modes which result in dual circular dark solitons inside the microcavity, are separated from the resonant mode by 2 free spectral ranges (FSR). When the initial field is another feasible pattern of weak white Gaussian noise, the large frequency detuning leads to the amplification of the optical power in the microcavity, and the mode-interaction becomes stronger. Then, multiple dark solitons, which correspond to the spectra with multi-FSR, can be excited by selecting appropriate mode-interaction parameters. In addition, by turning the mode-interaction parameters, the dark soliton number can be regulated, and the comb tooth interval in the spectrum also changes accordingly. Theoretical analysis results are significant for studying the dark soliton in the microcavity with mode-interaction.
|
Received: 13 August 2020
Revised: 24 September 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 22 October 2020
|
PACS:
|
42.55.-f
|
(Lasers)
|
|
42.65.Tg
|
(Optical solitons; nonlinear guided waves)
|
|
42.65.Sf
|
(Dynamics of nonlinear optical systems; optical instabilities, optical chaos and complexity, and optical spatio-temporal dynamics)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51705121) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. SQ2019YFE010747). |
Corresponding Authors:
†Corresponding author. E-mail: xuxin@hfut.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xin Xu(徐昕), Xueying Jin(金雪莹), Jie Cheng(程杰), Haoran Gao(高浩然), Yang Lu(陆洋), and Liandong Yu(于连栋) Analysis of dark soliton generation in the microcavity with mode-interaction 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 024210
|
1 Del'Haye P, Coillet A, Fortier T, Beha K, Cole D C, Yang K Y, Lee H, Vahala K J, Papp S B and Diddams S A 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 516 2 Newman Z L, Maurice V, Drake T, Stone J R, Briles T C, Spencer D T, Fredrick C, Li Q, Westly D, Ilic B R, Shen B, Suh M G, Yang K Y, Johnson C, Johnson D M S, Hollberg L, Vahala K J, Srinivasan K, Diddams S A, Kitching J, Papp S and Hummon M T 2019 Optica 6 680 3 Lamb E S, Carlson D R, Hickstein D D, Stone J R, Diddams S A and Papp S B 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 9 024030 4 Suh M G and Vahala K J 2018 Science 359 884 5 Johnson A R, Okawachi Y, Levy J S, Cardenas J, Saha K, Lipson M and Gaeta A L 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 875 6 Zhang X Y, Cao Q T, Wang Z, Liu Y X, Qiu C W, Yang L, Gong Q H and Xiao Y F 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 21 7 Xue X X, Xuan Y, Wang C, Wang P H, Liu Y, Niu B, Leaird D E, Qi M H and Weiner A M 2016 Opt. Express 24 687 8 Liang W, Savchenkov A A, Matsko A B, Ilchenko V S, Seidel D and Maleki L 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 2290 9 Kobatake T, Kato T, Itobe H, Nakagawa Y and Tanabe T 2016 IEEE Photonics J. 8 4501109 10 Godey C, Balakireva I V, Coillet A and Chembo Y K 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 063814 11 Hu X H, Zhang W, Liu Y S, Feng Y, Zhang W F, Zhang L R, Wang Y S and Zhao W 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 074216 12 Xue X X, Xuan Y, Liu Y, Wang P H, Chen S, Wang J, Leaird D E, Qi M H and Weiner A M 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 594 13 Ferdous F, Miao H, Leaird D E, Srinivasan K, Wang J, Chen L, Varghese L T and Weiner A M 2011 Nat. Photon. 5 770 14 Del'Haye P, Arcizet O, Gorodetsky M L, Holzwarth R and Kippenberg T J 2009 Nat. Photon. 3 529 15 Grudinin I S, Yu N and Maleki L 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 878 16 Savchenkov A A, Grudinin I S, Matsko A B, Strekalov D, Mohageg M, Ilchenko V S and Maleki L 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 1313 17 Liu Y, Xuan Y, Xue X X, Wang P H, Chen S, Metcalf A J, Wang J, Leaird D E, Qi M and Weiner A M 2014 Optica 1 137 18 Haus H A and Huang W 1991 Proc. IEEE 79 1505 19 Xue X X, Xuan Y, Wang P H, Liu Y, Leaird D E, Qi M H and Weiner A M 2015 Laser & Photonics Rev. 4 L23 20 Bao C, Xuan Y, Leaird D E, Wabnitz S and Weiner A M 2017 Optica 4 1011 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|