| PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Gaussian process tomography based on Bayesian data analysis for soft x-ray and AXUV diagnostics on EAST |
| Yan Chao(晁燕)1,2, Liqing Xu(徐立清)1, Liqun Hu(胡立群)1, Yanmin Duan(段艳敏)1, Tianbo Wang(王天博)3, Yi Yuan(原毅)1,2, Yongkuan Zhang(张永宽)1,2 |
1 Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;
2 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
3 Southwestern Institute for Physics, CNNC, Chengdu 610200, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This work presents the Gaussian process tomography (GPT) based on Bayesian data analysis and its applications in soft x-ray (SXR) and absolute extreme ultraviolet spectroscopy (AXUV) diagnostics on experimental advanced superconducting tokamak (EAST). This is the first application of the GPT method in the AXUV diagnostic system in fusion devices. It is found that even if only horizontal detector arrays are used to reconstruct the two-dimensional (2D) distribution of SXR and AXUV emissivity fields, the GPT method performs robustly and extremely fast, which enables the GPT method to provide real-time feedback on impurity transport and fast magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) events. By reconstructing SXR emissivity in the poloidal cross section on EAST, an m/n=1/1 internal kink mode has been observed, and the plasma redistribution due to the kink mode is clearly visible in the reconstructions, where m is the poloidal mode number and n is the toroidal mode number. Sawtooth-like internal disruptions extended throughout the entire plasma core and mainly driven by the m/n=2/1 mode have been acquired. During the sawtooth-like internal disruption crash phase, the conversion from an m=2 mode to an m=1 mode is observed. Using the reconstructed AXUV emissivity field we were able to observe the process of impurity accumulated in the plasma core and the mitigation of core impurity due to neon injection in the plasma edge. The data from all other diagnostics involved in the analysis shows that the reconstructions from AXUV measurements are reliable.
|
Received: 30 May 2020
Revised: 02 July 2020
Accepted manuscript online: 06 July 2020
|
|
PACS:
|
52.25.Os
|
(Emission, absorption, and scattering of electromagnetic radiation ?)
|
| |
52.25.Vy
|
(Impurities in plasmas)
|
| |
52.35.Py
|
(Macroinstabilities (hydromagnetic, e.g., kink, fire-hose, mirror, ballooning, tearing, trapped-particle, flute, Rayleigh-Taylor, etc.))
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program of China (Grant No. 11505226) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11975273). |
Corresponding Authors:
Liqing Xu, Liqun Hu
E-mail: lqxu@ipp.ac.cn;lqhu@ipp.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yan Chao(晁燕), Liqing Xu(徐立清), Liqun Hu(胡立群), Yanmin Duan(段艳敏), Tianbo Wang(王天博), Yi Yuan(原毅), Yongkuan Zhang(张永宽) Gaussian process tomography based on Bayesian data analysis for soft x-ray and AXUV diagnostics on EAST 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 095201
|
| [1] |
Chen K Y, Xu L Q, Hu L Q, Duan Y M, Li X Q, Yuan Y, Mao S T, Sheng X L and Zhao J L 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 063504
|
| [2] |
Duan Y M, Hu L Q, Mao S T, Chen K Y, Lin S Y and EAST Diagnostics Team 2012 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83 093501
|
| [3] |
Duan Y M, Mao S T, Hu L Q, Xu P, Xu L Q, Zhang J Z and Lin S Y 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 11D434
|
| [4] |
Ingesson L C, Alper B, Peterson B J and Vallet J C 2008 Fusion Sci. Technol. 53 528
|
| [5] |
Cormack A M 1964 J. Appl. Phys. 35 2908
|
| [6] |
Ertl K, VonderLinden W, Dose V and Weller A 1996 Nucl. Fusion 36 1477
|
| [7] |
Anton M, Weisen H, Dutch M, Von der Linden W, Buhlmann F, Chavan R, Marletaz B, Marmillod P and Paris P 1996 Plasma Physics Controlled Fusion 38 1849
|
| [8] |
Li D, Dong Y B, Deng W, Shi Z B, Fu B Z, Gao J M, Wang T B, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Yang Q W and Duan X R 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 11E319
|
| [9] |
Wang T, Mazon D, Svensson J, Li D, Jardin A and Verdoolaege G 2018 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89 10F103
|
| [10] |
Igochine V 2015 Active Control of Magneto-hydrodynamic Instabilities in Hot Plasmas, Vol. 83 (Berlin: Springer) p. 68
|
| [11] |
Gelman A, Carlin J B, Stern H S, Dunson D B, Vehtari A and Rubin D B 2013 Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. (Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC) pp. 63-79
|
| [12] |
Chalupka K, Williams C and Murray I 2013 J. Mach. Learn. Res. 14 333
|
| [13] |
Li D, Svensson J, Thomsen H, Medina F, Werner A and Wolf R 2013 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 083506
|
| [14] |
Williams C and Agakov F 2002 Neural Computation 14 1169
|
| [15] |
Dewit T D, Pecquet A L, Vallet J C and Lima R 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1 3288
|
| [16] |
Alladio F, Bardotti G, Bartiromo R ηl 1986 Nucl. Fusion 26 11
|
| [17] |
Carreras B, Waddell B V, Hicks H R and Lynch S J 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 2732
|
| [18] |
Xu L Q, Duan Y M, Chen K Y, Zhao H L, Luo Z P, Zheng Z, Liu Y, Liu H Q, Chen Y J, Yi Y, Hu L Q, Du H F and Shi T H 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 126002
|
| [19] |
Zhang L, Morita S, Xu Z, et al. 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 123509
|
| [20] |
Han X, Hu A, Li D, Xiao S, Tian B, Zang Q, Zhao J, Hsieh C, Gong X, Hu L, Xu G and Team E A S T 2018 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 46 406
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
