INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
The determinant factors for map resolutions obtained using CryoEM single particle imaging method |
Yihua Wang(王义华)1, Daqi Yu(余大启)1, Qi Ouyang(欧阳颀)1, Haiguang Liu(刘海广)2 |
1 Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructure and Mesoscopic Physics, Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, School of Physics, Center for Quantitative Biology School of Physics, The Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences at School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100084, China;
2 Complex Systems Division, Beijing Computational Science Research Centre, Beijing 100193, China |
|
|
Abstract The CryoEM single particle structure determination method has recently received broad attention in the field of structural biology. The structures can be resolved to near-atomic resolutions after model reconstructions from a large number of CryoEM images measuring molecules in different orientations. However, the determining factors for reconstructed map resolution need to be further explored. Here, we provide a theoretical framework in conjunction with numerical simulations to gauge the influence of several key factors to CryoEM map resolutions. If the projection image quality allows orientation assignment, then the number of measured projection images and the quality of each measurement (quantified using average signal-to-noise ratio) can be combined to a single factor, which is dominant to the resolution of reconstructed maps. Furthermore, the intrinsic thermal motion of molecules has significant effects on the resolution. These effects can be quantitatively summarized with an analytical formula that provides a theoretical guideline on structure resolutions for given experimental measurements.
|
Received: 12 July 2018
Revised: 08 October 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11774011, 11434001, U1530401, and U1430237). |
Corresponding Authors:
Haiguang Liu
E-mail: hgliu@csrc.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yihua Wang(王义华), Daqi Yu(余大启), Qi Ouyang(欧阳颀), Haiguang Liu(刘海广) The determinant factors for map resolutions obtained using CryoEM single particle imaging method 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 128702
|
[1] |
Bai X C, McMullan G and Scheres. S H W 2012 Nat. Methods 9 853
|
[2] |
Faruqi A R and McMullan G 2011 Quarterly Rev. Biophys. 44 357
|
[3] |
Tang G, Peng L, Baldwin P R, Mann D S, Jiang W, Rees I and Ludtke S J 2007 J. Struct. Biol. 157 38
|
[4] |
Scheres S H 2012 J. Struct. Biol. 180 519
|
[5] |
Grigorieff N 2016 Methods Enzymol. 579 191
|
[6] |
da Fonseca P C A and Morris E P 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7573
|
[7] |
Passmore L A and Russo C J 2016 Methods in Enzymology 579 51
|
[8] |
Bernecky C, Herzog F, Baumeister W, Plitzko J M and Cramer P 2016 Nature 529 551
|
[9] |
Li X, Mooney P, Zheng S, Booth C R, Braunfeld M B, Gubbens S, Agard D A and Cheng Y 2013 Nat. Methods 10 584
|
[10] |
Zheng S Q, Palovcak E, Armache J P, Verba K A, Cheng Y and Agard D A 2017 Nat. Methods 14 331
|
[11] |
Yu X, Jin L and Zhou Z H 2008 Nature 453 415
|
[12] |
Chen J Z, Settembre E C, Aoki S T, Zhang X, Bellamy A R, Dormitzer P R, Harrison S C and Grigorieff N 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 10644
|
[13] |
Zhang X, Jin L, Fang Q, Hui W H and Zhou Z H 2010 Cell 141 472
|
[14] |
Cao E, Liao M, Cheng Y and Julius D 2013 Nature 504 113
|
[15] |
Bernstein F C, Koetzle T F, Williams G J, Meyer E F Jr, Brice M D, Rodgers J R, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T and Tasumi M 1977 J. Mol. Biol. 112 535
|
[16] |
Berman H M, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gillil, G, Bhat T N, Weissig H, Shindyalov I N and Bourne P E 2000 Nucleic Acids Res. 28 235
|
[17] |
Newman R, Chagoyen M, Carazo J M and Henrick K 2002 Trends BioChem. Sci. 27 11
|
[18] |
Henrick K, Newman R, Tagari M and Chagoyen M 2003 J. Struct. Biol. 144 228
|
[19] |
Rose P W, Prlic A, Bi C, Bluhm W F, Christie C H, Dutta S, Green R K, Goodsell D S, Westbrook J D, Woo J, Young J, Zardecki C, Berman
|
|
H M, Bourne P E and Burley S K 2015 Nucleic Acids Res. 43 D345 [20] Nogales E 2016 Nat. Methods 13 24
|
[21] |
Lawson C L, Patwardhan A, Baker M L, Hryc C, Garcia E S, Hudson B P, Lagerstedt I, Ludtke S J, Pintilie G, Sala R, Westbrook J D, Berman H M, Kleywegt G J and Chiu W 2016 Nucleic Acids Res. 44 D396
|
[22] |
Morris A L, MacArthur M W, Hutchinson E G and Thornton J M 1992 Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 12 345
|
[23] |
Karplus P A and Diederichs K 2012 Science 336 1030
|
[24] |
Heel M v and Harauz G 1986 Optik 73 146
|
[25] |
Bottcher B, Wynne S A and Crowther R A ¨ 1997 Nature 386 88
|
[26] |
Rosenthal P B and Henderson R 2003 J. Mol. Biol. 333 721
|
[27] |
Scheres S H and Chen S 2012 Nat. Methods 9 853
|
[28] |
Kucukelbir A, Sigworth F J and Tagare H D 2014 Nat. Methods 11 63
|
[29] |
Henderson R 1995 Quarterly Rev. BioPhys. 28 171
|
[30] |
Penczek P A 2010 Methods Enzymol. 482 73
|
[31] |
Liao H Y and Frank J 2010 Structure 18 768
|
[32] |
Bartesaghi A, Merk A, Banerjee S, Matthies D, Wu X W, Milne J L S and Subramaniam S 2015 Science 348 1147
|
[33] |
Merk A, Bartesaghi A, Banerjee S, Falconieri V, Rao P, Davis M I, Pragani R, Boxer M B, Earl L A, Milne J L and Subramaniam S 2016 Cell 165 1698
|
[34] |
Bartolucci C, Lamba D, Grazulis S, Manakova E and Heumann H 2005 J. Mol. Biol. 354 940
|
[35] |
Shaikh T R, Gao H, Baxter W T, Asturias F J, Boisset N, Leith A and Frank J 2008 Nat. Protocols 3 1941
|
[36] |
Yershova A, Jain S, Lavalle S M and Mitchell J C 2010 Int. J. Rob. Res. 29 801
|
[37] |
Bakan A, Dutta A, Mao W, Liu Y, Chennubhotla C, Lezon T R and Bahar I 2014 Bioinformatics 30 2681
|
[38] |
Dashti A, Schwander P, Langlois R, Fung R, Li W, Hosseinizadeh A, Liao H Y, Pallesen J, Sharma G, Stupina V A, Simon A E, Dinman J D, Frank J and Ourmazd A 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 17492
|
[39] |
Chen S, Wu J, Lu Y, Ma Y B, Lee B H, Yu Z, Ouyang Q, Finley D J, Kirschner M W and Mao Y 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 12991
|
[40] |
Dashti A, Ben Hail D, Mashayekhi G, Schwander P, des Georges A, Frank J and Ourmazd A 2017 BioRxiv 167080
|
[41] |
Trueblood K N, Bürgi H B, Burzlaff H, Dunitz J D, Gramaccioli C M, Schulz H H, Shmueli U and Abrahams S C 1996 Acta Crystallographica A52 770
|
[42] |
Frank J and Ourmazd A 2016 Methods 100 61
|
[43] |
Hosseinizadeh A, Mashayekhi G, Copperman J, Schwander P, Dashti A, Sepehr R, Fung R, Schmidt M, Yoon C H, Hogue B G, Williams G J, Aquila A and Ourmazd A 2017 Nat. Methods 14 877
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|