INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Discussions on the non-equilibrium effects in the quantitative phase field model of binary alloys |
Wang Zhi-Jun(王志军), Wang Jin-Cheng(王锦程)†, and Yang Gen-Cang(杨根仓) |
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China |
|
|
Abstract All the quantitative phase field models try to get rid of the artificial factors of solutal drag, interface diffusion and interface stretch in the diffuse interface. These artificial non-equilibrium effects due to the introducing of diffuse interface are analysed based on the thermodynamic status across the diffuse interface in the quantitative phase field model of binary alloys. Results indicate that the non-equilibrium effects are related to the negative driving force in the local region of solid side across the diffuse interface. The negative driving force results from the fact that the phase field model is derived from equilibrium condition but used to simulate the non-equilibrium solidification process. The interface thickness dependence of the non-equilibrium effects and its restriction on the large scale simulation are also discussed.
|
Received: 23 October 2009
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
68.35.Fx
|
(Diffusion; interface formation)
|
|
65.40.-b
|
(Thermal properties of crystalline solids)
|
|
64.70.D-
|
(Solid-liquid transitions)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in NWPU, China (Grants Nos. 17-TZ-2007, 03-TP-2008, and 24-TZ-2009) and the Doctorate Foundation of Northwestern Polytechnical University. |
Cite this article:
Wang Zhi-Jun(王志军), Wang Jin-Cheng(王锦程), and Yang Gen-Cang(杨根仓) Discussions on the non-equilibrium effects in the quantitative phase field model of binary alloys 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 078101
|
[1] |
Boettinger W J, Warren J A, Beckermann C and Karma A 2002 Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 23 163
|
[2] |
Li J J, Wang J C and Yang G C 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 3516
|
[3] |
Moelans N, Blanpain B and Wollants P 2008 CALPHAD 32 268
|
[4] |
Wang Z J, Wang J C and Yang G C 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 017305
|
[5] |
Wang Z J, Wang J C and Yang G C 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 052603
|
[6] |
Karma A and Rappel A J 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 4323
|
[7] |
Karma A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 115701
|
[8] |
Ramirez J C, Beckermann C, Karma A and Diepers H J 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 051607
|
[9] |
Almgren R F 1999 J. Appl. Math. 59 2086
|
[10] |
Wheeler A A, Boettinger W J and McFadden G B 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 7424
|
[11] |
Kim S G, Kim W T and Suzuki T 1998 Phys. Rev. E 58 3316
|
[12] |
Qin R S and Wallach E R 2003 Acta Mater. 51 6199
|
[13] |
Kim S G, Kim W T, Suzuki T and Ode M 2004 J. Cryst. Growth 261135
|
[14] |
Ramirez J C and Beckermann C 2003 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit AIAA 2003-816
|
[15] |
Hillert M and Rettenmayr M 2003 Acta Mater. 51 2803 endfootnotesize
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|