ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Analysis of relative wavelength response characterization and its effects on scanned-WMS gas sensing |
Dao Zheng(郑道), Zhi-Min Peng(彭志敏), Yan-Jun Ding(丁艳军), and Yan-Jun Du(杜艳君)† |
1 State Key Laboratory of Power Systems, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
Abstract Our recently proposed three-step method showed the promising potential to improve the accuracy of relative wavelength response (RWR) characterization in the wavelength-modulation spectroscopy (WMS) over the commonly used summation method. A detailed comparison of the three-step method and the summation method, for the wavelength-scanned WMS gas-sensing, was performed with different laser parameters (modulation indexes and scan indexes) and gas properties (pressures and concentrations). Simulation results show that the accuracy of the predicted gas parameters is strongly limited by the RWR characterization with large modulation index and high gas pressure conditions. Both fitting residuals of RWR and errors of predicted gas parameters from the recently proposed three-step method are nearly 2 orders of magnitude smaller than those from the summation method. In addition, the three-step method is further improved by introducing a coupling term for the 2 nd harmonic amplitude. Experiments with CO2 absorption transition at 6976.2026 cm -1 were conducted and validated the simulation analysis. The modified-three-step method presents an improved accuracy in RWR description with at least 5% smaller fitting residual for all conditions compared with the three-step method, although the deviation of the deduced CO2 concentrations between these two methods does not exceed 0.2%.
|
Received: 17 December 2020
Revised: 10 January 2021
Accepted manuscript online: 13 January 2021
|
PACS:
|
42.55.Px
|
(Semiconductor lasers; laser diodes)
|
|
42.62.-b
|
(Laser applications)
|
|
42.62.Fi
|
(Laser spectroscopy)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51906120 and 11972213), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 2018M640125 and 2019T120088), and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0201104). |
Corresponding Authors:
†Corresponding author. E-mail: duyanjun13@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Dao Zheng(郑道), Zhi-Min Peng(彭志敏), Yan-Jun Ding(丁艳军), and Yan-Jun Du(杜艳君) Analysis of relative wavelength response characterization and its effects on scanned-WMS gas sensing 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 044210
|
1 Hanson R K2015 CLEO: 2015 STh4O.1 2 Shao J Xiang J D, Axner O and Ying C F 2016 Appl. Opt. 55 2339 3 Zhang Z Pang T, Yang Y, Xia H, Cui X, Sun P, Wu B, Wang Y, Sigrist M W and Dong F 2016 Opt. Express 24 A943 4 Li J D Peng Z M and Ding Y J 2020 Optics and Lasers in Engineering 126 105875 5 Pogàny A Klein A and Ebert V 2015 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 165 108 6 Girard J J Choudhary R and Hanson R K 2018 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 221 194 7 Du Y J Peng Z M and Ding Y J 2018 Opt. Express 26 9263 8 Campbell M F Wang S K, Goldenstein C S, Spearrin R M, Tulgestke A M, Zaczek L T, Davidson D F and Hanson R K 2015 Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 35 231 9 Laich A R Ninnemann E, Sneha N, Ramees R, Samuel B, Pitz W J, Goldsborough S S and Vasu S S 2020 Combust. Flame 212 486 10 Johnson S E Davidson D F and Hanson R K 2020 Combust. Flame 216 161 11 He D, Peng Z M and Ding Y J 2019 Combust. Flame 207 222 12 Amato F D and Rosa M D 2002 Optics and Lasers in Engineering 37 533 13 Li H J, Farooq A, Jeffries J B and and Hanson R K 2008 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 109 132 14 Goldenstein C S and Hanson R K 2015 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 152 127 15 Peng Z M, Du Y J and and Ding Y J 2020 Sensors (Basel) 20 681 16 Peng Z, Du Y and Ding Y 2020 Sensors (Basel) 20 616 17 Cui R Y, Dong L, Wu H P, Li S Z, Zhang L, Ma W G, Yin W B, Xiao L T, Jia S T and Tittel F K 2018 Opt. Express 26 24318 18 Tommasi E D, Casa G and Gianfrani L 2006 Appl. Phys. B 85 257 19 Li H J, Rieker G B, Liu X, Jeffries J B and Hanson R K 2006 Appl. Opt. 45 1052 20 Sun K, Chao X, Sur R, Jeffries J B and Hanson R K 2012 Appl. Phys. B 110 497 21 Wei W, Peng W Y, Wang Y, Choudhary R, Wang S K, Shao J K and Hanson R K 2018 Appl. Phys. B 125 9 22 Kluczynski P, Jahjah M, N?hle L, Axner O, Belahsene S, Fischer M, Koeth J, Rouillard Y, Westberg J, Vicet A and Lundqvist S 2011 Appl. Phys. B 105 427 23 Qu Z C Ghorbani, R, Valiev D and Schmidt F M 2015 Opt. Express 23 16492 24 Chen J, Hangauer A, Strzoda R and Amann M C 2010 Appl. Phys. B 102 381 25 Liu J X, Zhou, Y T, Guo S J, Hou J J, Zhao G, Ma W G, Dong L Wu Y Q, Zhang L, Yin W B, Xiao L T, Axner O and Jia S T 2019 Opt. Express 27 1249 26 Zhao G Tan W, Hou J J, Qiu X D, Ma W G, Li Z X, Dong L, Zhang L, Yin W B, Xiao L T, Axner O and Jia S T 2016 Opt. Express 24 1723 27 Sur Ritobrata, Peng W Y, Strand Christopher, Spearrin M R, Jeffries J B, Hanson R K, Bekal Anish, Halder Purbasha, Poonacha S P, Vartak Sameer and Sridharan Arun K 2017 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 187 364 28 Sun K, Chao X, Sur R, Goldenstein C S, Jeffries J B and Hanson R K 2013 Meas. Sci. Technol. 24 125203 29 Goldenstein C S Strand C L, Schultz I A, Sun K, Jeffries J B and Hanson R K 2014 Appl. Opt. 53 356 30 Du Y J Peng M Z and Ding Y J 2020 Opt. Express 28 3482 31 Kluczynski P and Axner O 1999 Appl. Opt. 38 5803 32 Gamache R R and Lamouroux J L 2013 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 130 158 33 Peng W Y, Strand C L and Hanson R K 2019 Appl. Phys. B 126 17 34 Rieker G B, Jeffries J B and Hanson R K 2009 48 5546 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|