Special Issue:
SPECIAL TOPIC — Ultracold atom and its application in precision measurement
|
TOPICAL REVIEW—Ultracold atom and its application in precision measurement |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Progress on the 40Ca+ ion optical clock |
Baolin Zhang(张宝林)1,2,3, Yao Huang(黄垚)1,2, Huaqing Zhang(张华青)1,2,3, Yanmei Hao(郝艳梅)1,2,3, Mengyan Zeng(曾孟彦)1,2,5, Hua Guan(管桦)1,2, Kelin Gao(高克林)1,2,4 |
1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS), Wuhan 430071, China; 2 Key Laboratory of Atomic Frequency Standards, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 4 Center for Cold Atom Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 5 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China |
|
|
Abstract Progress of the 40Ca+ ion optical clock based on the 42S1/2-3d 2D5/2 electric quadrupole transition is reported. By setting the drive frequency to the “magic” frequency Ω0, the frequency uncertainty caused by the scalar Stark shift and second-order Doppler shift induced by micromotion is reduced to the 10-19 level. By precisely measuring the differential static scalar polarizability △α0, the uncertainty due to the blackbody radiation (BBR) shift (coefficient) is reduced to the 10-19 level. With the help of a second-order integrating servo algorithm, the uncertainty due to the servo error is reduced to the 10-18 level. The total fractional uncertainty of the 40Ca+ ion optical clock is then improved to 2.2×10-17, whereas this value is mainly restricted by the uncertainty of the BBR shift due to temperature fluctuations. The state preparation is introduced together with improvements in the pulse sequence, and furthermore, a better signal to noise ratio (SNR) and less dead time are achieved. The clock stability of a single clock is improved to 4.8×10-15/√τ (in seconds).
|
Received: 16 March 2020
Revised: 18 May 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
42.62.Fi
|
(Laser spectroscopy)
|
|
37.10.Ty
|
(Ion trapping)
|
|
95.55.Sh
|
(Auxiliary and recording instruments; clocks and frequency standards)
|
|
06.20.-f
|
(Metrology)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFA0304401, 2018YFA0307500, 2017YFA0304404, and 2017YFF0212003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11622434, 11774388, 11634013, 11934014, and 91736310), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB21030100), the CAS Youth Innovation Promotion Association (Grant Nos. Y201963 and 2018364), and the Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province, China (Grant No. 2017CFA040). |
Corresponding Authors:
Hua Guan, Kelin Gao
E-mail: guanhua@wipm.ac.cn;klgao@wipm.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Baolin Zhang(张宝林), Yao Huang(黄垚), Huaqing Zhang(张华青), Yanmei Hao(郝艳梅), Mengyan Zeng(曾孟彦), Hua Guan(管桦), Kelin Gao(高克林) Progress on the 40Ca+ ion optical clock 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 074209
|
[1] |
Barwood G P, Huang G, Klein H A, Johnson L A M, King S A, Margolis H S, Szymaniec K and Gill P 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 050501
|
[2] |
Chou C W, Hume D B, Koelemeij J C J, Wineland D J and Rosenband T 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 070802
|
[3] |
Dubé P, Madej A A, Tibbo M and Bernard J E 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 173002
|
[4] |
Huntemann N, Sanner C, Lipphardt B, Tamm C and Peik E 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 063001
|
[5] |
Rosenband T, Hume D B, Schmidt P O, Chou C W, Brusch A, Lorini L, Oskay W H, Drullinger R E, Fortier T M, Stalnaker J E, Diddams S A, Swann W C, Newbury N R, Itano W M, Wineland D J and Bergquist J C 2008 Science 319 1808
|
[6] |
Campbell S L, Hutson R B, Marti G E, Goban A, Darkwah Oppong N, McNally R L, Sonderhouse L, Robinson J M, Zhang W, Bloom B J and Ye J 2017 Science 358 90
|
[7] |
Campbell S L, Hutson R B, Marti G E, Goban A, Darkwah Oppong N, McNally R L, Sonderhouse L, Robinson J M, Zhang W, Bloom B J and Ye J 2017 Science 358 90
|
[8] |
McGrew W F, Zhang X, Fasano R J, Schäffer S A, Beloy K, Nicolodi D, Brown R C, Hinkley N, Milani G, Schioppo M, Yoon T H and Ludlow A D 2018 Nature 564 87
|
[9] |
Nicholson T L, Campbell S L, Hutson R B, Marti G E, Bloom B J, McNally R L, Zhang W, Barrett M D, Safronova M S, Strouse G F, Tew W L and Ye J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 6896
|
[10] |
Ushijima I, Takamoto M, Das M, Ohkubo T and Katori H 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 185
|
[11] |
Brewer S M, Chen J S, Hankin A M, Clements E R, Chou C W, Wineland D J, Hume D B and Leibrandt D R 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 033201
|
[12] |
Oelker E, Hutson R B, Kennedy C J, Sonderhouse L, Bothwell T, Goban A, Kedar D, Sanner C, Robinson J M, Marti G E, Matei D G, Legero T, Giunta M, Holzwarth R, Riehle F, Sterr U and Ye J 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 714
|
[13] |
Guan H, Huang Y, Liu P L, Bian W, Shao H and Gao K L 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 054213
|
[14] |
Dubé P, Madej A A, Zhou Z and Bernard J E 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 023806
|
[15] |
Huang Y, Guan H, Zeng M, Tang L and Gao K 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 011401
|
[16] |
Peik E, Schneider T and Tamm C 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 145
|
[17] |
Bian W, Huang Y, Guan H, Liu P, Ma L and Gao K 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 063121
|
[18] |
Huang Y, Guan H, Bian W, Ma L, Liang K, Li T and Gao K 2017 Appl. Phys. B 123 166
|
[19] |
Dubé P, Madej A A, Shiner A and Jian B 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 042119
|
[20] |
Zeng M Y, Huang Y, Shao H, Wang M, Zhang H Q, Zhang B L, Guan H and Gao K L 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 074202
|
[21] |
Huang Y, Guan H, Liu P, Bian W, Ma L, Liang K, Li T and Gao K 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 013001
|
[22] |
Itano W M, Bergquist J C, Bollinger J J, Gilligan J M, Heinzen D J, Moore F L, Raizen M G and Wineland D J 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 3554
|
[23] |
Berkeland D J, Miller J D, Bergquist J C, Itano W M and Wineland D J 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 5025
|
[24] |
Shao H, Huang Y, Guan H, Qian Y and Gao K 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 042507
|
[25] |
Arora B, Safronova M S and Clark C W 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 064501
|
[26] |
Mitroy J, Safronova M S and Clark C W 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 202001
|
[27] |
Safronova M S and Safronova U I 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 012503
|
[28] |
Barwood G P, Huang G, King S A, Klein H A and Gill P 2015 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48 035401
|
[29] |
Huang Y, Liu Q, Cao J, Ou B, Liu P, Guan H, Huang X and Gao K 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 053841
|
[30] |
Dubé P, Madej A A, Bernard J E, Marmet L, Boulanger J S and Cundy S 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 033001
|
[31] |
Shao H, Huang Y, Guan H, Li C, Shi T and Gao K 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 053415
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|