PHYSICS OF GASES, PLASMAS, AND ELECTRIC DISCHARGES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Tests of the real-time vertical growth rate calculation on EAST |
Na-Na Bao(鲍娜娜)1,2, Yao Huang(黄耀)1, Jayson Barr3, Zheng-Ping Luo(罗正平)1, Yue-Hang Wang(汪悦航)1, Shu-Liang Chen(陈树亮)1, Bing-Jia Xiao(肖炳甲)1,2, David Humphreys3 |
1 Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China; 2 University of Science & Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China; 3 General Atomics, P. O. Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608, USA |
|
|
Abstract In order to measure controllability of vertical instability in EAST, the calculation of model-based vertical growth rate, called rt-gamma, has been successfully carried out in real time. The numerical computing method is adapted from rigid plasma response model in TokSys, which is a widely-used analysis tool for tokamak devices in Matlab environment, but the code is rewritten by taking advantage of GPU parallel computing capability to accelerate the computation. The calculation of rt-gamma is validated by comparing it with the corresponding result generated by TokSys for totally 3508 cases. It is shown that the average absolute value of relative errors is about 0.85%. In addition, the calculation program of rt-gamma has been successfully applied during 2019 EAST campaign. The comparison with experimental results is discussed in this paper. The real-time calculation tool is well able to calculate model-based vertical growth rate, which is convenient for fast and continuous evaluations of EAST control system stability performances.
|
Received: 17 February 2020
Revised: 25 March 2020
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
52.55.Fa
|
(Tokamaks, spherical tokamaks)
|
|
07.05.Dz
|
(Control systems)
|
|
12.20.Fv
|
(Experimental tests)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National MCF Energy Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFE0302100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11705239, 11805236, and 11875291). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yao Huang
E-mail: yaohuang@ipp.ac.cn
|
Cite this article:
Na-Na Bao(鲍娜娜), Yao Huang(黄耀), Jayson Barr, Zheng-Ping Luo(罗正平), Yue-Hang Wang(汪悦航), Shu-Liang Chen(陈树亮), Bing-Jia Xiao(肖炳甲), David Humphreys Tests of the real-time vertical growth rate calculation on EAST 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 065204
|
[1] |
Hender T C, Wesley J C, Bialek J, et al. 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 S128
|
[2] |
Hassanein A, Sizyuk T and Ulrickson M 2008 Fusion Eng. 83 1020
|
[3] |
Wan B N and International Collaborators 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 104011
|
[4] |
Li J, Guo H Y, Wan B N, Gong X Z, Liang Y F, Xu G S, Gan K F, Hu J S, Wang H Q, Wang L, Zeng L, Zhao Y P, Denner P, Jackson G L, Loarte A, Maingi R, Menard J E, Rack M and Zou X L 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 817
|
[5] |
Liu L, Xiao B J, Humphreys D A, Luo Z P and Chen S L 2014 Fusion Eng. 89 563
|
[6] |
Albanese R, Ambrosino R, Castaldo A, De G, Luo Z P, Mele A, Pironti A, Xiao B J and Yuan Q P 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 086039
|
[7] |
Lazarus E A, Lister J B and Neilson G H 1990 Nucl. Fusion 30 111
|
[8] |
Yuan Q P, Xiao B J, Luo Z P, Walker M L, Welander A S, Hyatt A W, Qian J P, Zhang R R, Humphreys D A, Leuer J A, Johnson R D, Penaflor B G and Mueller D 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 043009
|
[9] |
Humphreys D A, Ferron J R, Bakhtiari M, Blair J A, In Y, Jackson G L, Jhang H, Johnson R D, Kim J S, LaHaye R J, Leuer J A, Penaflor B G, Schuster E, Walker M L, Wang H, Welander A S and Whyte D G 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 943
|
[10] |
Qian J P, Wan B N, Shen B, Xiao B J, Sun Y W, Shi Y J, Lin S Y, Li J G and Gong X Z 2008 Plasma Sci. Technol. 10 290
|
[11] |
Qian J P, Wan B N, Shen B, Walker M L, Humpreys D A and Xiao B J 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 024302
|
[12] |
Qiu Q L, Xiao B J, Guo Y, Liu L, Xing Z and Humpreys D A 2016 Nucl. Fusion 56 106029
|
[13] |
Bao N N, Huang Y, Xiao B J, Yuan Q P, Zhuang H D, Luo Z P, Wang Y H and Zhang R R 2020 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 48 715
|
[14] |
Huang Y, Xiao B J and Luo Z P 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 085204
|
[15] |
Chen S L, Villone F, Xiao B J, Barbato L, Mastrostefano S, Luo Z P, Guo Y and Liu L 2016 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58 025017
|
[16] |
Yuan Q P, Xiao B J, Penaflor B G, Piglowski D A, Liu L Z, Johnson R D, Walker M L and Humphreys D A 2010 Fusion Eng. 85 474
|
[17] |
Xiao B J, Yuan Q P, Luo Z P, Huang Y, Liu L, Guo Y, Pei X F, Chen S L, Humphreys D A, Hyatt A W, Mueller D, Calabró G, Crisanti F, Albanese A and Ambrosino R 2016 Fusion Eng. 112 660
|
[18] |
Lao L L, St H E, Peng Q, Ferron J R, Strait E J, Taylor T S, Meyer W H, Zhang C and You K I 2005 Fusion Sci. Technol. 48 968
|
[19] |
Walker M L, Ferron J R, Humphreys D A, Johnson R D, Leuer J A, Penaflor B G, Piglowski D A, Ariola M, Pironti A and Schuster E 2003 Fusion Eng. 66-68 749
|
[20] |
Humphreys D A, Ferron J R, Hyatt A W, La Haye R J, Leuer J A, Penaflor B G, Walker M L, Welander A S and In Y 2008 Fusion Eng. 83 193
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|