|
|
Deterministic hierarchical joint remote state preparation with six-particle partially entangled state |
Na Chen(陈娜)1, Bin Yan(颜斌)1, Geng Chen(陈赓)1, Man-Jun Zhang(张曼君)2, Chang-Xing Pei(裴昌幸)3 |
1 College of Electronics, Communications and Physics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China;
2 Network Technology Research Institute, China Unicom, Beijing 100048, China;
3 State Key Laboratory of Integrated Services Networks, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China |
|
|
Abstract In this paper, we present a novel scheme for hierarchical joint remote state preparation (HJRSP) in a deterministic manner, where two senders can jointly and remotely prepare an arbitrary single-qubit at three receivers' port. A six-particle partially entangled state is pre-shared as the quantum channel. There is a hierarchy among the receivers concerning their powers to reconstruct the target state. Due to various unitary operations and projective measurements, the unit success probability can always be achieved irrespective of the parameters of the pre-shared partially entangled state.
|
Received: 19 March 2018
Revised: 03 June 2018
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
03.67.Hk
|
(Quantum communication)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61701285 and 61701284), the Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents, China (Grant No. 2017RCJJ070), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (Grant No. 2017M622233). |
Corresponding Authors:
Na Chen
E-mail: na_chen_xd@126.com
|
Cite this article:
Na Chen(陈娜), Bin Yan(颜斌), Geng Chen(陈赓), Man-Jun Zhang(张曼君), Chang-Xing Pei(裴昌幸) Deterministic hierarchical joint remote state preparation with six-particle partially entangled state 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 090304
|
[1] |
Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press)
|
[2] |
Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crepeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A and Wooters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
|
[3] |
Lo H K 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 012313
|
[4] |
Pati A K 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 014302
|
[5] |
Bennett C H, DiVincenzo D P, Shor P W, Smolin J A, Terhal B M and Wootters W K 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 077902
|
[6] |
Xia Y, Song J and Song H S 2007 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 3719
|
[7] |
Nguyen B A and Kim J 2008 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 095501
|
[8] |
Li J F, Liu J M and Xu X Y 2015 Quantum Inf. Process 14 3465
|
[9] |
Li J F, Liu J M, Feng X L and Oh C H 2016 Quantum Inf. Process 15 2155
|
[10] |
Nguyen B A 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 4113
|
[11] |
Chen Q Q, Xia Y, Song J and An N B 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 4483
|
[12] |
Luo M X, Chen X B, Ma S Y et al 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 4796
|
[13] |
Chen Q Q, Xia Y and Nguyen B A 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 2617
|
[14] |
Wang D, Zha X W and Lan Q 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 5853
|
[15] |
Chen Z F, Liu J M and Ma L 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 020312
|
[16] |
Xia Y, Song J, Song H S, et al. 2008 Int. J. Quantum Inform. 06 1127
|
[17] |
Luo M X, Chen X B, Yang Y X and Niu X X 2012 Quantum Inf. Process 11 751
|
[18] |
Xiao X Q, Liu J M and Zeng G H 2011 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44 075501
|
[19] |
Bich C T, Don N V and Nguyen B A 2012 Int. J. Thero. Phys. 51 2272
|
[20] |
Xia Y, Chen Q Q and Nguyen B A 2012 J. Phys. A:Math. Theor. 45 335306
|
[21] |
Zhan Y B and Ma P C 2013 Quantum Inf. Process 12 997
|
[22] |
Wang Y and Ji X 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 020306
|
[23] |
Jiang M, Zhou L L, Chen X P and You S H 2013 Opt. Commun. 301 39
|
[24] |
Chen N, Quan D X, Xu F F, Yang H and Pei C X 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 100307
|
[25] |
Wang X W, Xia L X, Wang Z Y and Zhang D Y 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 1196
|
[26] |
Wnag X W, Zhang D Y, Tang S Q and Zhang X G 2010 Int. J. Thero. Phys. 49 2691
|
[27] |
Wang XW, Zhang D Y, Tang S Q and Xie L J 2011 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44 035505
|
[28] |
Shukla C and Pathak A 2013 Phys. Lett. A 377 1337
|
[29] |
Mishra S, Shukla C, Pathak A, Srikanth R and Venugopalan A 2015 Int. J. Thero. Phys. 54 3143
|
[30] |
Shukla C, Thapliyal K and Pathak A 2017 Quantum Inf. Process 16 205
|
[31] |
Nguyen B A and Cao T B 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 3582
|
[32] |
Wootters W K 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett 80 2245
|
[33] |
Dai H Y, Chen P X, Liang L M and Li C Z 2006 Phys. Lett. A 355 285
|
[34] |
Dai H Y, Chen P X, Zhang M and Li C Z 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 0027
|
[35] |
Dai H Y, Zhang M, Zhang Z R and Xi Z R 2013 Commun. Theor. Phys. 60 313
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|