|
|
Joint remote preparation of an arbitrary five-qubit Brown state via non-maximally entangled channels |
Chang Li-Wei (常利伟)a b, Zheng Shi-Hui (郑世慧)a b, Gu Li-Ze (谷利泽)a b, Xiao Da (肖达)a b, Yang Yi-Xian (杨义先)a b |
a Information Security Center, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China; b National Engineering Laboratory for Disaster Backup and Recovery, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China |
|
|
Abstract We firstly present a novel scheme for deterministic joint remote state preparation of an arbitrary five-qubit Brown state using four Greenberg-Horme-Zeilinger (GHZ) entangled states as the quantum channel. The success probability of this scheme is up to 1, which is superior to the existing ones. Moreover, the scheme is extended to the generalized case where three-qubit and four-qubit non-maximally entangled states are taken as the quantum channel. We simultaneously employ two common methods to reconstruct the desired state. By comparing these two methods, we draw a conclusion that the first is superior to the second-optimal positive operator-valued measure only taking into account the number of auxiliary particles and the success probability.
|
Received: 21 November 2013
Revised: 10 March 2014
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
03.67.-a
|
(Quantum information)
|
|
03.65.Ud
|
(Entanglement and quantum nonlocality)
|
|
03.67.Mn
|
(Entanglement measures, witnesses, and other characterizations)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61370194 and 61202082), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant Nos. BUPT2012RC0219), and the Foundation of Science and Technology of Huawei of China. |
Corresponding Authors:
Chang Li-Wei
E-mail: changliwei002@163.com
|
Cite this article:
Chang Li-Wei (常利伟), Zheng Shi-Hui (郑世慧), Gu Li-Ze (谷利泽), Xiao Da (肖达), Yang Yi-Xian (杨义先) Joint remote preparation of an arbitrary five-qubit Brown state via non-maximally entangled channels 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 090307
|
[1] |
Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crepeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A and Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
|
[2] |
Qi K G and Yuan H C 2005 Chin. Phys. 14 1716
|
[3] |
Fang M F, Wang X W and Liu X 2006 Chin. Phys. 15 676
|
[4] |
Tan X H, Fang X M and Wang G Y 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 340
|
[5] |
Zhou Y L, Yang L J and Dai H Y 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 3692
|
[6] |
Zhang C M and Zha X W 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 1339 (in Chinese)
|
[7] |
Lo H K 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 012313
|
[8] |
Pati A K 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 014302
|
[9] |
Bennett C H, DiVincenzo D P, Shor P W and Smolin J A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 077902
|
[10] |
Devetak I and Berger T 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 177901
|
[11] |
Zeng B and Zhang P 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 022316
|
[12] |
Berry D W and Sanders B C 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 027901
|
[13] |
Hayashi A, Hashimoto T and Horibe M 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 052302
|
[14] |
Liu J M and Wang Y Z 2004 Chin. Phys. 13 0147
|
[15] |
Ye M Y, Zhang Y S and Guo G C 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 022310
|
[16] |
Kurucz Z, Adam P, Kis Z and Janszky J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 052315
|
[17] |
Kurucz Z, Adam P and Janszky J 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 062301
|
[18] |
Deng L, Chen A X and Xu Y Q 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 3725
|
[19] |
Wang Y and Ji X 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 020306
|
[20] |
Luo M X, Deng Y, Chen X B and Yang Y X 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 279
|
[21] |
An N B and Kim J 2008 J. Phys. B 41 095501
|
[22] |
An N B 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 4113
|
[23] |
Peng J Y, Luo M X and Mo Z W 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 2325
|
[24] |
Zhan Y B and Ma P C 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 0997
|
[25] |
Xiao X Q, Liu J M and Zeng G H 2011 J. Phys. B 44 075501
|
[26] |
Zhan Y B, Hu B L and Ma P C 2011 J. Phys. B 44 095501
|
[27] |
Luo M X and Deng Y 2012 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51 3027
|
[28] |
Brown I D K, Stepney S, Sudbery A and Braunstein S L 2005 J. Phys. A 38 1119
|
[29] |
Muralidharan S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 032321
|
[30] |
Luo M X, Peng J Y and Mo Z W 2013 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 644
|
[31] |
Helstrom C W 1976 Quantum Dectection and Estimation Theory (New York: Academic Press)
|
[32] |
Mar T and Horodecki P 1999 arXiv:quant-ph/9906039
|
[33] |
Aharonov Y and Vaidman L 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 11
|
[34] |
Johansen L M 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 012119
|
[35] |
Reck M, Zeilinger A, Bernstein H J and Bertani P 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 58
|
[36] |
Knill E, Laflamme R and Milburn G J 2001 Nature 409 46
|
[37] |
Pittman T B, Fitch M J, Jacobs B C and Franson J D 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 032316
|
[38] |
O'Brien J L, Pryde G J, White A G, Ralph T C and Branning D 2003 Nature 426 264
|
[39] |
Ahnert S E and Payne M C 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 012330
|
[40] |
Ziman M and Buzek V 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 022343
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|