|
|
|
Signal propagation of a feedforward neural network under electromagnetic stimulation |
| Huilan Yang(杨惠兰)1,2,†, Wei Zhang(张伟)1, and Junjie Bao(包俊杰)1 |
1 Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China; 2 Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Cortical networks exhibit distinct layered characteristics, with neurons in each layer collectively responsible for the transmission and processing of external signals. Information transfer between different regions and layers of the cerebral cortex is crucial for information processing in the nervous system. Investigating signal propagation among neural networks helps us understand the top-down or bottom-up information transmission mechanisms of the nervous system. In this study, a five-layer feedforward neural network with time delay was constructed. By calculating the discharge timing, signal-to-noise ratio, and population Fano factor of the multi-layer neural network, the characteristics of signal propagation between different levels of the nervous system under electromagnetic stimulation were investigated. The results show that the delay time has a significant impact on signal propagation; under appropriate delay time conditions, the neural network can achieve effective signal propagation. Electromagnetic stimulation can significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio of neural network signal propagation, shorten the signal propagation time, and enhance the stability of signal propagation. This study not only provides an important theoretical basis for revealing the regulatory mechanisms of signal transmission between different levels of the nervous system but also offers useful references for the future development of electromagnetic neural modulation technologies and the treatment of diseases related to impaired signal transmission in the nervous system.
|
Received: 06 January 2026
Revised: 13 March 2026
Accepted manuscript online: 16 March 2026
|
|
PACS:
|
83.60.Np
|
(Effects of electric and magnetic fields)
|
| |
87.19.lj
|
(Neuronal network dynamics)
|
| |
87.19.lq
|
(Neuronal wave propagation)
|
|
| Fund: This project was supported by the Tianjin Municipal Education Commission Scientific Research Program Project (Grant No. 2025KJ149). |
Corresponding Authors:
Huilan Yang
E-mail: hlyang@tjcu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Huilan Yang(杨惠兰), Wei Zhang(张伟), and Junjie Bao(包俊杰) Signal propagation of a feedforward neural network under electromagnetic stimulation 2026 Chin. Phys. B 35 068301
|
[1] Shibata T, Hattori N, Nishijo H, Takahashi T, Higuchi Y, Kuroda S and Takakusaki K 2025 Front. Cell. Neurosci. 18 1525816 [2] Seguin C, Sporns O and Zalesky A 2023 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 24 557 [3] Chen G, Kang B, Lindsey J, Druckmann S and Li N 2021 Cell 184 3717 [4] Liang J H, Wang S J and Zhou C S 2022 Natl. Sci. Rev. 9 nwab102 [5] Lyu X, Liu T and Ma Y 2025 Schizophrenia 11 36 [6] Zhang Y and Reynolds J N J 2024 Curr. Neuropharmacol. 22 1566 [7] Trajkovic J, Veniero D, Hanslmayr S, Palva S, Cruz G, Romei V and Thut G 2025 PLoS Biol. 23 e3002688 [8] Pariz A, Esfahani Z G, Parsi S S, Valizadeh A, Canals S and Mirasso C R 2018 NeuroImage 172 349 [9] Dumont G and Gutkin B 2019 PLoS Comput. Biol. 15 e1007019 [10] Hahn G, Bujan A F, Fregnac Y, Aertsen A and Kumar A 2014 PLoS Comput. Biol. 10 e1003811 [11] Wu S, Zhou K, Ai Y, Zhou G, Yao D and Guo D 2021 Cogn. Neurodyn. 15 53 [12] Yi M and Yang L 2010 Phys Rev E 81 061924 [13] Ge M, Jia Y, Lu L, Xu Y, Wang H and Zhao Y 2020 Nonlinear Dyn. 99 2355 [14] Yu D, Wang G, Li T, Ding Q and Jia Y 2023 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 117 106894 [15] Lu L, Jia Y, Kirunda J B, Xu Y, Ge M, Pei Q and Yang L 2019 Nonlinear Dyn. 95 1673 [16] Dai S, Lu L, Wei Z, Zhu Y and Yi M 2022 Chaos Solitons Fractals 164 112762 [17] Wang G W, Ge M Q, Lu L L, Jia Y and Zhao Y J 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 103 2627 [18] Lu L L, Jia Y, Liu W H and Yang L J 2017 Complexity 2017 7628537 [19] Ge M, Lu L and Xu Y 2020 Chaos Solitons Fractals 133 109645 [20] Wang G, Wu Y, Xiao F, Ye Z and Jia Y 2022 Physica A 598 127274 [21] Liu Y, Ma J, Xu Y and Jia Y 2019 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 29 1950156 [22] Rezaei H, Aertsen A, Kumar A and Valizadeh A 2020 PLoS Comput. Biol. 16 e1008033 [23] Pariz A, Fischer I, Valizadeh A and Mirasso C 2021 PLoS Comput. Biol. 17 e1008129 [24] Ding Q, Wu Y, Li T, Yu D and Jia Y 2023 Chaos Solitons Fractals 171 113464 [25] Jiao D, Xu L and Gu Z 2024 Neural Regen. Res. 20 917 [26] Taylor J L, Bhatt P, Hernandez B, Iv M, Adamson M M, Heath A, Yesavage J A and McNerney M W 2025 NeuroImage: Clin.47 103819 [27] Odermatt I A, Schulthess-Lutz M, Mihelj E, Howell P, Heimhofer C, McMackin R, Ruddy K, Freund P, Kikkert S and Wenderoth N 2025 J. Neurosci. 45 e2189242025 [28] Georgiev C, Author C, Mongold S J, Cabaraux P, Naeije G, Duque J and Bourguignon M 2025 Imaging Neurosci. 3 imag a 00570 [29] Li R Z, Xu G Z and Yang S 2020 Life Sci. Instrum. 18 3 [30] Borich M R, Wheaton L A, Brodie S M, Lakhani B and Boyd L A 2016 Neurosci. Lett. 618 25 [31] Hoy K E, Bailey N, Michael M, Fitzgibbon B, Rogasch N C, Saeki T and Fitzgerald P B 2016 Cereb. Cortex 26 4563 [32] Kito S, Hasegawa T, Takamiya A, Noda T, Nakagome K, Higuchi T and Koga Y 2017 J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 29 155 [33] Chung S W, Rogasch N C, Hoy K E and Fitzgerald P B 2018 Brain Stimul. 11 566 [34] Yu F, Wang X Q, Guo R Y, Ying Z J, He Y and Zou Q 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 120501 [35] Wang X J, Hu H, Huang C, Kennedy H, Li C, Logothetis N, Lu Z L, Luo Q, Poo M M, Tsao D, Wu S, Wu Z, Zhang X and Zhou D 2020 Natl. Sci. Rev. 7 1418 [36] Hodgkin A, Huxley A and Katz B 1952 J. Physiol. 116 424 [37] Gelman D M and Marín O 2010 Eur. J. Neurosci. 31 2136 [38] Wang X J and Buzsaki G 1996 J. Neurosci. 16 6402 [39] Compte A, Sanchez-Vives M V, McCormick D A and Wang X J 2003 J. Neurophysiol. 89 2707 [40] Yang H L, Wang H B, Guo L and Xu G Z 2022 J. Comput. Neurosci. 50 109 [41] Yang H L, Xu G Z and Wang H B 2022 Cogn. Neurodyn. 16 707 [42] Hodgkin A L and Keynes R D 1953 J. Physiol. 119 513 [43] Harris E J 1954 J. Physiol. 124 248 [44] Socorro A and Garcia F 2012 Int. Agrophys. 26 167 [45] Gao Y, Zheng Y, Chen R, Wang H, Dong L and Dou J 2016 IEEE Trans. Magn. 52 5001008 [46] Riedel P, Heil M, Bender S, Dippel G, Korb F M, Smolka M and Marxen M 2019 Hum. Brain Mapp. 40 4301 [47] Esposito R, Bortoletto M and Miniussi C 2020 Neuroscientist 26 471 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|