| ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Coupled oscillation model of spherical bubble cluster in liquid cavity wrapped by elastic shell |
| Xin-Yi Zuo(左馨怡), Rui Liu(刘睿), Zhao-Kang Lei(雷照康), Yu-Ting Wu(吴玉婷), Xiu-Ru Li(李秀如), and Cheng-Hui Wang(王成会)† |
| Institute of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Ultrasonics, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Bubbles within an elastic shell, which undergo ultrasound-driven oscillation to treat tumors and soft tissues, are frequently treated as viscoelastic media. Therefore, studying the dynamic behavior of bubbles wrapped in a viscoelastic medium while considering an elastic shell can provide theoretical support for ultrasound biotherapy. Bubbles are always in the form of clusters. Therefore, a model of spherical bubble clusters in a liquid cavity wrapped by an elastic shell was constructed, the coupled oscillation equations of bubbles were obtained by taking into account the dynamic effects of the elastic shell and the viscoelastic media outside the cavity, and the oscillation behaviors of the bubbles were analyzed. Acoustic waves at 1.5 MHz could cause bubbles with a radius of 1 μm to resonate. Increasing the number of bubbles increased the suppressing effect of bubble oscillation caused by bubble interaction. The bubble cluster oscillation caused the elastic shell to oscillate and be stressed, and the stress trend was the inverse of the bubble oscillation trend with maximal tensile and compressive stresses. Bubbles with an equilibrium radius of 2 μm exhibited the lowest inertial cavitation threshold, making inertial cavitation more likely under high-frequency acoustic excitation. The inertial cavitation threshold of bubbles was heavily influenced by the acoustic wave frequency, bubble number density, and bubble cluster radius. The nonspherical oscillation stability of bubbles was primarily affected by the driving acoustic pressure amplitude and frequency, bubble initial radius, bubble number density, and bubble cluster radius. The acoustic frequency and amplitude exhibited a synergistic effect, with a minimum unstable driving acoustic pressure threshold of approximately 0.13 MPa. The initial radius within the elastic shell affected the minimum unstable driving acoustic pressure threshold.
|
Received: 09 April 2025
Revised: 26 May 2025
Accepted manuscript online: 27 May 2025
|
|
PACS:
|
43.35.+d
|
(Ultrasonics, quantum acoustics, and physical effects of sound)
|
| |
43.25.+y
|
(Nonlinear acoustics)
|
| |
47.55.dp
|
(Cavitation and boiling)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12374441). |
Corresponding Authors:
Cheng-Hui Wang
E-mail: wangld001@snnu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Xin-Yi Zuo(左馨怡), Rui Liu(刘睿), Zhao-Kang Lei(雷照康), Yu-Ting Wu(吴玉婷), Xiu-Ru Li(李秀如), and Cheng-Hui Wang(王成会) Coupled oscillation model of spherical bubble cluster in liquid cavity wrapped by elastic shell 2025 Chin. Phys. B 34 104302
|
[1] Park S, Yoon H, Emelianov S and Aglyamov S 2017 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys 56 07JF10 [2] Harmon J N, Hyde J E, Jensen D E, D’Cessare E C, Odarenko A A, Bruce M F and Khaing Z Z 2024 Exp. Neurol. 374 114681 [3] Pellow C, Jafari Sojahrood A, Zhao X, Kolios M C, Exner A A and Goertz D E 2024 ACS Nano 18 410 [4] Wu N, Cao Y, Liu Y, Zhou Y, He H, Tang R, Wan L, Wang C, Xiong X, Zhong L and Li P 2023 Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11 1173381 [5] Honari A and Sirsi S R 2023 Pharmaceutics 15 170 [6] Ho Y J, Huang C C, Fan C H, Liu H L and Yeh C K 2021 Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78 6119 [7] Li Q and Du L N 2021 Acta Pharm Sin. 56 761 [8] Elhelf I A S, Albahar H, Shah U, Oto A, Cressman E and Almekkawy M 2018 Diagn. Interv. Imaging 99 349 [9] Chen Y H, Moore D, Lee C C and Su Y H 2023 J. Neuro-Oncol. 165 53 [10] Schenk H J, Steppe K and Jansen S 2015 Trends Plant Sci. 20 199 [11] Noblin X, Rojas N O, Westbrook J, Llorens C, Argentina M and Dumais J 2012 Science 335 1322 [12] Marti D, Krüger Y, Fleitmann D, Frenz M and Rička J J 2012 Fluid Phase Equilib. Zones 4 13 [13] Church C C 1995 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97 1510 [14] Obreschkow D, Kobel P, Dorsaz N, de Bosset A, Nicollier C and Farhat M 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 094502 [15] Fourest T, Laurens J M, Deletombe E, Dupas J and Arrigoni M 2015 Thin-Walled Struct. 86 67 [16] Vincent O and Marmottant P 2017 J. Fluid Mech. 827 194 [17] Vincent O, Marmottant P, Gonzalez-Avila S R, Ando K and Ohl C D 2014 Soft Matter 10 1455 [18] Wang Q X 2017 Phys. Fluids 29 072101 [19] Gaudron R, Murakami K and Johnsen E 2020 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 143 104047 [20] Qamar A, Wong Z Z, Fowlkes J B and Bull J L 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 143702 [21] Gubaidullin D A and Fedorov Y Y 2020 J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 61 517 [22] Yasui K, Iida Y, Tuziuti T, Kozuka T and Towata A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 016609 [23] An Y 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 066313 [24] Shen X, Wu P and Lin W 2024 Ultrason. Sonochem. 107 106890 [25] Huang C Y, Li F, Feng S Y,Wang C H, Chen S, Hu J, He X R and Song J K 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 024301 [26] Xu L, Yao X R and Shen Y 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 044702 [27] Zhang T R, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S, Wang C H and Guo J Z 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 124301 (in Chinese) [28] Fedorov Y V and Gubaidullina D D 2023 Lobachevskii J. Math. 44 1600 [29] Wang C H, Mo R Y, Hu J and Chen S 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 234301 (in Chinese) [30] Song X, Loskutova K, Chen H, Shen G and Grishenkov D 2021 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 150 1750 [31] Qin D, Zou Q Q, Li Z Y, Wang W, Wan M X and Feng Y 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 154701 (in Chinese) [32] Shao W and Chen W 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 024702 [33] Zilonova E, Solovchuk M and Sheu T W H 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 023109 [34] Zhang W and An Y 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 053023 [35] Wu Q, Gray M, Smith C A B, Bau L, Cleveland R O, Coussios C and Stride E 2024 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156 3608 [36] Ma Y, Zhang G and Ma T 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105953 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|