|
|
|
Suppression of laser power error in a miniaturized atomic co-magnetometer based on split ratio optimization |
| Wei-Jia Zhang(张伟佳)1, Wen-Feng Fan(范文峰)1,2,†, Shi-Miao Fan(范时秒)1,2, and Wei Quan(全伟)2 |
1 School of Instrumentation Science and Opto-electronics Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100190, China;
2 Beihang Hangzhou Innovation Institute Yuhang, Xixi Octagon City, Yuhang District, Hangzhou 310023, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract A miniaturized atomic spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) co-magnetometer measures angular velocity using a balanced polarimetry technique which is easily affected by the laser power. A laser power closed-loop control system is usually used to suppress the fluctuation of the laser power. Although this method can greatly eliminate the fluctuation of the in-loop laser power (the feedback laser), it cannot fully eliminate the fluctuation of the out-of-loop laser power (the signal measurement laser). This leads to SERF gyroscope laser power error, which reduces the inertial measurement accuracy. In this paper, the influence mechanism of the split ratio (the ratio of the in-loop laser power to the out-of-loop laser power) on the out-of-loop laser power control accuracy is analyzed by establishing a laser power transmission model inside and outside the loop. Moreover, a method is developed to improve the out-of-loop laser power stability by optimizing the split ratio. Comparative experiments showed that the relative Allan standard deviation of the out-of-loop laser power decreased from 5.48×10-6 to 2.62×10-6 at 100 s, and decreased by an order of magnitude from 1.76×10-5 to 3.30×10-6 at 1000 s. Correspondingly, the rate ramp coefficient in the Allan standard deviation curve of the SERF gyroscope test data decreased from 1.312 [(°/h)/h] to 0.246 [(°/h)/h]. And the bias stability increased from 0.032 °/h to 0.019 °/h. Therefore, the proposed method can improve the long-term stability of the probe laser power and effectively suppress the laser power error of the SERF gyroscope.
|
Received: 09 June 2022
Revised: 13 July 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 18 July 2022
|
|
PACS:
|
07.07.Df
|
(Sensors (chemical, optical, electrical, movement, gas, etc.); remote sensing)
|
| |
07.55.Ge
|
(Magnetometers for magnetic field measurements)
|
| |
42.79.-e
|
(Optical elements, devices, and systems)
|
|
| Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61925301 and 62103026). |
Corresponding Authors:
Wen-Feng Fan
E-mail: fanwenfeng@buaa.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Wei-Jia Zhang(张伟佳), Wen-Feng Fan(范文峰), Shi-Miao Fan(范时秒), and Wei Quan(全伟) Suppression of laser power error in a miniaturized atomic co-magnetometer based on split ratio optimization 2023 Chin. Phys. B 32 030701
|
[1] Lamoreaux S K, Jacobs J P, Heckel B R, Raab F J and Fortson E N 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 3125
[2] Vasilakis G, Brown J, Kornack T and Romalis M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 261801
[3] Kimball D F J., Dudley J, Li Y, Patel D and Valdez J 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 075004
[4] Lee J, Almasi A and Romalis M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 161801
[5] Shaham R, Katz O and Firstenberg O 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 506
[6] Jiang M, Su H, Garcon A, Peng X and Budker D 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 1402
[7] Kornack T W 2005 A test of CPT and Lorentz symmetry using a K-3He co-magnetometer PhD Dissertation (Princeton University)
[8] Brown J M, Smullin S J, Kornack T W and Romalis M V 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 151604
[9] Smiciklas M, Brown J, Cheuk L, Smullin S and Romalis M V 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 171604
[10] Kornack T W, Ghosh R K and Romalis M V 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 230801
[11] Li R J, Fan W F, Jiang L W, Duan L H, Quan W and Fang J C 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 032109
[12] Liang Y X, Jiang L W, Liu J L, Fan W F, Zhang W J, Fan S M, Quan W and Fang J C 2022 Phys. Rev. Appl. 17 024004
[13] Jiang L W, Liu J L, Liang Y X, Tian M N and Quan W 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 120 074101
[14] Jiang L W, Quan W, Li R J, Fan W F, F. Liu F, Qin J, Wan S A and Fang J C 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 054103
[15] Fu Y, Fan W F, Ruan J S, Liu Y, Lu Z L and Quan W 2022 IEEE Trans. Instrument. Meas. 71 1
[16] Fan W F, Quan W, Zhang W J, Xing L and Liu G 2019 IEEE Access 7 28574
[17] Liu F, Duan L H, Fan W F, Pang H Y, Liu S X and Quan W 2021 IEEE Sensors Journal 22 1990
[18] Ma D Y, Lu J, Fang X J, Yang K, Wang K, Zhang N, Han B C and Ding M 2022 IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 69 991
[19] Fan W F, Quan W, Liu F, Duan L H and Liu G 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 110701
[20] Xing L, Wang Z, Huang J, Quan W, Fan W F and Jiang L W 2018 13rd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) pp. 735-738
[21] Tricot F, Phung D, Lours M, Guérandel S and Clercq E 2018 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89 113112
[22] Niu Y, Duan L H, Zhang J X, Huang J, Zhai Y Y and Quan W 2022 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 93 043002
[23] Seifert F, Kwee P, Heurs M, Willke B and Danzmann K 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 2000
[24] Kwee P, Willke B and Danzmann K 2011 Appl. Phys. B 102 515
[25] Balakshy V, Kuznetsov Y I, Mantsevich S and Polikarpova N 2014 Opt. Laser Technol. 62 89
[26] Huang J, Wang Z, Fan W F, Xing L, Zhang W J, Duan L H and Quan W 2020 Opt. Express 28 35748 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|
