INTERDISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
Prev
|
|
|
Fault-tolerant finite-time dynamical consensus of double-integrator multi-agent systems with partial agents subject to synchronous self-sensing function failure |
Zhi-Hai Wu(吴治海)† and Lin-Bo Xie(谢林柏) |
Engineering Research Center of Internet of Things Technology Applications of MOE, School of Internet of Things Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China |
|
|
Abstract This paper investigates fault-tolerant finite-time dynamical consensus problems of double-integrator multi-agent systems (MASs) with partial agents subject to synchronous self-sensing function failure (SSFF). A strategy of recovering the connectivity of network topology among normal agents based on multi-hop communication and a fault-tolerant finite-time dynamical consensus protocol with time-varying gains are proposed to resist synchronous SSFF. It is proved that double-integrator MASs with partial agents subject to synchronous SSFF using the proposed strategy of network topology connectivity recovery and fault-tolerant finite-time dynamical consensus protocol with the proper time-varying gains can achieve finite-time dynamical consensus. Numerical simulations are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the theoretical results.
|
Received: 23 June 2022
Revised: 14 July 2022
Accepted manuscript online: 22 July 2022
|
PACS:
|
89.75.-k
|
(Complex systems)
|
|
05.65.+b
|
(Self-organized systems)
|
|
02.30.Yy
|
(Control theory)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61876073) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. JUSRP21920). |
Corresponding Authors:
Zhi-Hai Wu
E-mail: wuzhihai@jiangnan.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Zhi-Hai Wu(吴治海) and Lin-Bo Xie(谢林柏) Fault-tolerant finite-time dynamical consensus of double-integrator multi-agent systems with partial agents subject to synchronous self-sensing function failure 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 128902
|
[1] Yan Z P, Liu Y B, Zhou J J, Zhang W and Wang L 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 040203 [2] Zhang X, Wang J H, Yang D D and Xu Y 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 070501 [3] Ren H W and Deng F Q 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 100506 [4] Mo L P, Guo S Y and Yu Y G 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 070504 [5] Fang M Y, Zhou C C, Huang X and Li X 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 010703 [6] Qiu X F, Zhang Y X and Li K Z 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 050501 [7] Chen X, Yin L Y, Liu Y T and Liu H 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 090701 [8] Liu X D and Mo L P 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 070701 [9] Wang X L and Hong Y G 2008 Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress, July 6-11, 2008, Seoul, Korea, p. 15185 [10] Guan Z H, Sun F L, Wang Y W and Li T 2012 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 59 2646 [11] Lu X Q, Chen S H and Lü J H 2013 IET Control Theory Appl. 7 1562 [12] Zhao Y, Duan Z S and Wen G H 2015 IET Control Theory Appl. 9 312 [13] Yu S H and Long X J 2015 Automatica 54 158 [14] Chen C, Lewis F L, Xie S L, Modares H, Liu Z and Zuo S 2019 Automatica 102 19 [15] Yan B, Wu C F and Shi P 2019 J. Franklin Inst. 356 6547 [16] Cao L, Li H Y, Dong G W and Lu R Q 2021 IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 51 3855 [17] Dong G W, Li X M, Yao D Y, Li H Y and Lu R Q 2021 Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 31 9588 [18] Xiong S S and Hou Z S 2021 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. [19] Yu Y J, Guo J and Xiang Z R 2022 IEEE Syst. J. 16 3480 [20] Ren W and Beard R W 2005 IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 50 655 [21] Jin Z P and Murray R M 2006 Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, December 13-15, 2006, San Diego, USA, p. 1001 [22] Yuan D M, Xu S Y, Zhao H Y and Chu Y M 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 2438 [23] Lü J H and Tang C Y 2012 IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 57 1005 [24] Rong L N, Xu S Y, Zhang B Y and Zou Y 2013 Int. J. Syst. Sci. 44 1181 [25] Pan H, Nian X H and Guo L 2014 Int. J. Syst. Sci. 45 902 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|