ELECTROMAGNETISM, OPTICS, ACOUSTICS, HEAT TRANSFER, CLASSICAL MECHANICS, AND FLUID DYNAMICS |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
Thermal apoptosis analysis considering injection behavior optimization and mass diffusion during magnetic hyperthermia |
Yun-Dong Tang(汤云东)1,†, Jian Zou(邹建)1, Rodolfo C C Flesch(鲁道夫 C C 弗莱施)2, Tao Jin(金涛)3, and Ming-Hua He(何明华)4,‡ |
1 College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China; 2 Departamento de Automação e Sistemas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-900 Flórianopolis, SC, Brazil; 3 College of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China; 4 Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350122, China |
|
|
Abstract Thermally induced apoptosis for tumors depends mainly on the intrinsic characteristics of biological tissues as well as treatment temperature profile during magnetic hyperthermia. Further, treatment temperature distribution inside tumor depends on the injection behavior of irregular tumors, such as the injection dose and the injection location of nanofluids. In order to improve the treatment effect, the simulated annealing algorithm is adopted in this work to optimize the nanofluid injection behavior, and the improved Arrhenius model is used to evaluate the malignant ablations for three typical malignant tumor cell models. In addition, both the injection behavior optimization and the mass diffusion of nanofluid are both taken into consideration in order to improve the treatment effect. The simulation results demonstrate that the injection behavior can be optimized effectively by the proposed optimization method before therapy, the result of which can also conduce to improving the thermal apoptosis possibility for proposed typical malignant cells. Furthermore, an effective approach is also employed by considering longer diffusion duration and correct power dissipation at the same time. The results show that a better result can then be obtained than those in other cases when the power dissipation of MNPs is set to be QMNP=5.4×107W·m3 and the diffusion time is 16 h.
|
Received: 25 March 2021
Revised: 31 May 2021
Accepted manuscript online: 04 June 2021
|
PACS:
|
44.10.+i
|
(Heat conduction)
|
|
44.05.+e
|
(Analytical and numerical techniques)
|
|
87.85.J-
|
(Biomaterials)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62071124), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. 2020J01464), the Fund from the Education Department of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. JAT190013), the Fund from the Fuzhou University, China (Grant No. GXRC-19044), and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnologico (BR) (CNPq) (Grant No. 309244/2018-8). |
Corresponding Authors:
Yun-Dong Tang, Ming-Hua He
E-mail: tangyundong@fzu.edu.cn;mhhe@fjmu.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Yun-Dong Tang(汤云东), Jian Zou(邹建), Rodolfo C C Flesch(鲁道夫 C C 弗莱施), Tao Jin(金涛), and Ming-Hua He(何明华) Thermal apoptosis analysis considering injection behavior optimization and mass diffusion during magnetic hyperthermia 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 014401
|
[1] Sharma S K, Shrivastava N, Rossi F, Tung L D and Thanh N T K 2019 Nano Today 29 100795 [2] Astefanoaei I, Dumitru I, Stancu A and Chiriac H 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 044401 [3] Yu J, Huang D Y, Yousaf M Z, Hou Y L and Gao S 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 027506 [4] Mahjoob S and Vafai K 2009 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 52 1608 [5] Thiebaut C and Lemonnier D 2002 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 41 500 [6] Salloum M, Ma R and Zhu L 2009 Int. J. Hyperther. 25 309 [7] Boroon M P, Ayani M B and Bazaz S R 2018 J. Therm. Biol. 72 127 [8] LeBrun A, Joglekar T, Bieberich C, Ma R H and Zhu L 2017 J. Heat Trans-T Asme 139 051101 [9] MacLellan C J, Fuentes D, Prabhu S, Rao G, Weinberg J S, Hazle J D and Stafford R J 2018 Int. J. Hyperther. 34 687 [10] Seehra M S, Singh V, Dutta P, Neeleshwar S, Chen Y Y, Chen C L, Chou S W and Chen C C 2010 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43 145002 [11] Celik O, Can M M and Firat T 2014 J. Nanopart. Res. 16 2321 [12] Yu X, Mi Y, Wang L C, Li Z R, Wu D A, Liu R S and He S L 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 017503 [13] Zhang Z Q, Qian S, Wang R J and Zhu Z F 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 054401 (in Chinese) [14] Pennes H H 1948 J. Appl. Physiol. 1 93 [15] Yin Y, Ren Y, Li H and Qi H 2020 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 158 106533 [16] Wang H, Wu J N, Zhang X W, Liu Y, Zheng X, Zhuo Z H and Tang J T 2016 J. Med. Biol. Eng. 36 726 [17] Pearce J A 2015 J. Biomech. Eng. 137 121006 [18] He X M, Bhowmick S and Bischof J C 2009 J. Biomech. Eng. 131 074507 [19] Golneshan A A and Lahonian M 2011 Mech. Res. Commun. 38 425 [20] Abraham J P and Sparrow E M 2007 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50 2537 [21] Paruch M 2018 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 130 507 [22] He X M and Bischof J C 2005 Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33 502 [23] Feng Y S, Oden J T and Rylander M N 2008 J. Biomech. Eng. 130 041016 [24] Bhowmick S, Swanlund D J and Bischof J C 2000 J. Biomech. Eng. 122 51 [25] Tang Y, Jin T and Flesch R C C 2017 IEEE Trans. Magn. 53 5400106 [26] Wang X D, Lin W J, Su C and Wang X M 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 024302 [27] Rabienejhad M J, Mazaheri A and Davoudi-Darareh M 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 048401 [28] Rosensweig R E 2002 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 252 370 [29] Baxter L T and Jain R K 1989 Microvasc. Res. 37 77 [30] Sefidgar M, Soltani M, Raahemifar K, Bazmara H, Nayinian S M M and Bazargan M 2014 J. Biol. Eng. 8 12 [31] Moghadam M C, Deyranlou A, Sharifi A and Niazmand H 2015 Microvasc. Res. 101 62 [32] Zakariapour M, Hamedi M H and Fatouraee N 2017 Transport Porous Med. 116 251 [33] Yue K, Yu C, Lei Q C, Luo Y H and Zhang X X 2014 Appl. Therm. Eng. 69 11 [34] Siauve N, Nicolas L, Vollaire C and Marchal C 2004 Int. J. Hyperther. 20 815 [35] Kirkpatrick S 1984 J. Stat. Phys. 34 975 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|