CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
Prev
Next
|
|
|
The effect of laser beam size on laser-induced damage performance |
Han Wei(韩伟)†, Wang Fang(王芳), Zhou Li-Dan(周丽丹), Feng Bin(冯斌), Jia Huai-Ting(贾怀庭), Li Ke-Yu(李恪宇), Xiang Yong(向勇), and Zheng Wan-Guo(郑万国) |
Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China |
|
|
Abstract The influence of laser beam size on laser-induced damage performance, especially damage probability and laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT), is investigated. It is found that the damage probability is dependent on the beam size when various damage precursors with different potential behaviors are involved. This causes the damage probability and the LIDT to be different between the cases under a large-aperture beam and under a small-aperture beam. Moreover, the fluence fluctuation of large-aperture laser beam brings out hot spots, which move randomly across the beam from shot to shot. Thus it leads the most probable maximum fluence after many shots at any location on the optical component to be several times the average beam fluence. These two effects result in the difference in damage performance of the optical component between the cases under a large-aperture laser and under a small-aperture laser.
|
Received: 12 August 2011
Revised: 02 February 2012
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
79.20.Ds
|
(Laser-beam impact phenomena)
|
|
42.60.Jf
|
(Beam characteristics: profile, intensity, and power; spatial pattern formation)
|
|
42.70.Ce
|
(Glasses, quartz)
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Han Wei
E-mail: tonyhan2000@163.com
|
Cite this article:
Han Wei(韩伟), Wang Fang(王芳), Zhou Li-Dan(周丽丹), Feng Bin(冯斌), Jia Huai-Ting(贾怀庭), Li Ke-Yu(李恪宇), Xiang Yong(向勇), and Zheng Wan-Guo(郑万国) The effect of laser beam size on laser-induced damage performance 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 077901
|
[1] |
Lowdermilk W H 1996 Proc. SPIE 3047 16
|
[2] |
Andre M L 1996 Proc. SPIE 3047 38
|
[3] |
Peng H S, Zhang W Y and Wei X F 1998 Proc. SPIE 3492 25
|
[4] |
Papernov S and Schmid A W 2008 Proc. SPIE 7132 7132J1
|
[5] |
Bercegol H, Bouchut P, Lamaignere L, Garrec B and Le Raze G 2004 Proc. SPIE 5273 312
|
[6] |
Han W, Huang W, Wang F, Li K, Feng B, Li F, Jing F and Zheng W 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 106105
|
[7] |
Xiang X, Chen M, Chen M, Zu X, Zhu S and Wang L 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 018107
|
[8] |
Liu F, Zhang L and Li G 2005 Chin. Phys. 14 2145
|
[9] |
Han P G, Ma Z Y, Xia Z Y, Chen D Y, Xu J, Qian B, Chen S, Li W, Huang X F, Chen K J and Feng D 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 1410
|
[10] |
Menapace J A, Penetrante B, Golini D, Slomba A F, Miller P E, Parham T G, Nichols M and Peterson J 2001 Proc. SPIE 4679 56
|
[11] |
Krol H, Gallasi L, Grezes-Besset C, Natoli J Y and Commandre M 2005 Opt. Commun. 256 184
|
[12] |
Demange P, Carr C W, Radousky H B and Demos S G 2004 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 3298
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|