|
|
Comparative analysis of phase extraction methods based on phase-stepping and shifting curve in grating interferometry |
Liu Xiao-Song(刘小松)a), Li En-Rong(李恩荣)a), Zhu Pei-Ping(朱佩平)a)†, Liu Yi-Jin(刘宜晋)a)b), Zhang Kai(张凯) a), Wang Zhi-Li(王志立)a), Hong You-Li(洪友丽)a), Zhang Hui-Tao(张慧滔) a)d), Yuan Qing-Xi(袁清习)a), Huang Wan-Xia(黄万霞)a), and Wu Zi-Yu(吴自玉)a)c)‡ |
a Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, Chinab Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China; c National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230029, China; d School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China |
|
|
Abstract Two phase extraction methods which are based separately on phase-stepping and shifting curve are mainly used in phase-sensitive imaging in gating interferometry to determine the x-ray phase shift induced by an object in the beam. In this paper, the authors perform a full comparative analysis and present the main virtues and limitations of these two methods according to the theoretical analysis of the grating interferometry.
|
Received: 01 April 2009
Revised: 18 September 2009
Accepted manuscript online:
|
PACS:
|
87.59.-e
|
(X-ray imaging)
|
|
07.85.-m
|
(X- and γ-ray instruments)
|
|
07.60.Ly
|
(Interferometers)
|
|
Fund: Project supported by the Key
Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant
Nos.~10490194 and 10734070), the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Grant Nos.~10504033, 10774144 and 10979055), the Knowledge Innovation
Program of |
Cite this article:
Liu Xiao-Song(刘小松), Li En-Rong(李恩荣), Zhu Pei-Ping(朱佩平), Liu Yi-Jin(刘宜晋), Zhang Kai(张凯), Wang Zhi-Li(王志立), Hong You-Li(洪友丽), Zhang Hui-Tao(张慧滔), Yuan Qing-Xi(袁清习), Huang Wan-Xia(黄万霞), and Wu Zi-Yu(吴自玉) Comparative analysis of phase extraction methods based on phase-stepping and shifting curve in grating interferometry 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 040701
|
[1] |
David C, Nohammer B, Solak H H and Ziegler E 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 3287
|
[2] |
Momose A, Kawamoto S, Koyama I, Hamaishi, Y, Takai K and Suzuki Y 2003 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2: Lett. 42 L866
|
[3] |
Weitkamp T, Diaz A, David C, Pfeiffer F, Stampanoni M, Cloetens P and Ziegler E 2005 Opt. Express 13 6296
|
[4] |
Momose A, Yashiro W, Takeda Y, Suzuki Y and Hattori T 2006 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1: Regular Papers, Brief Communications & Review Papers 45] 5254
|
[5] |
Pfeiffer F, Weitkamp T, Bunk O and David C 2006 Nature Phys. 2 258
|
[6] |
David C, Weitkamp T, Pfeiffer F, Diaz A, Bruder J, Rohbeck T, Groso A, Bunk O, Stampanoni M and Cloetens P 2007 Spectrochimica Acta Part B-Atomic Spectroscopy 62 626
|
[7] |
Engelhardt M, Baumann J, Schuster M, Kottler C, Pfeiffer F, Bunk O and David C 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 224101
|
[8] |
Kottler C, David C, Pfeiffer F and Bunk O 2007 Opt. Express 15 1175
|
[9] |
Liu X, Guo J C, Peng X and Niu H B 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 1632
|
[10] |
Takeda Y, Yashiro W, Suzuki Y, Aoki S, Hattori T and Momose A 2007 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2: Lett. & Express Lett. 46 L89
|
[11] |
Jiang M, Wyatt C L and Wang G 2008 J. Biomedic. Imag. 2008 1
|
[12] |
Nesterets Y I and Wilkins S W 2008 Opt. Express 16 5849
|
[13] |
Pfeiffer F, Bech M, Bunk O, Kraft P, Eikenberry E F, Bronnimann C, Grunzweig C and David C 2008 Nature Mater. 7 134
|
[14] |
Chen B, Zhu P P, Liu Y J, Wang J Y, Yuan Q X, Huang W X, Ming H and Wu Z Y 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 1576 (in Chinese)
|
[15] |
Kottler C, Pfeiffer F, Bunk O, Grunzweig C, Bruder J, Kaufmann R, Tlustos L, Walt H, Briod I, Weitkamp T and David C 2007 Phys. Status Soli. 204 2728
|
[16] |
Pfeiffer F, Bunk O, David C, Bech M, Duc G L, Bravin A and Cloetens P 2007 Physics in Medicine and Biology 52 6923
|
[17] |
Weitkamp T, David C, Bunk O, Bruder J, Cloetens P and Pfeiffer F 2008 Euro. J. Radiol. 68 S13
|
[18] |
Pfeiffer F, Kottler C, Bunk O and David C 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 8105
|
[19] |
Donath T, Pfeiffer F, Bunk O, Groot W, Bednarzik M, Grunzweig C, Hempel E, Popescu S, Hoheisel M and David C 2008 Developments in X-Ray Tomography VI 7078 707817
|
[20] |
Bruning J H, Herriott D R, Gallagher J E, Rosenfeld D P, White A D and Brangaccio D J 1974 Appl. Opt. 13 2693
|
[21] |
Cloetens P, Guigay J P, DeMartino C, Baruchel J, and Schlenker M 1997 Opt. Lett. 22 1059
|
[22] |
Born M and Wolf E 1999 Principles of Optics} 7$^{\rm th}$ ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press) p.562
|
[23] |
Chapman D, Thomlinson W, Johnston R E, Washburn D, Pisano E, Gmur N, Zhong Z, Menk R, Arfelli F and Sayers D 1997 Physics in Medicine and Biology 42 2015
|
[24] |
Huang W X, Yuan Q X, Tian Y L, Zhu P P, Jiang X M and Wang J Y 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 677 (in Chinese)
|
[25] |
Zhu P P, Yuan Q X, Huang W X, Wang J Y, Shu H, Wu Z Y and Xian D C 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 1089 (in Chinese)
|
[26] |
Zhu P P, Yuan Q X, Huang W X, Wang J Y, Shu H, Chen B, Liu Y J, Li E R and Wu Z Y 2006 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 4142
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
Altmetric
|
blogs
Facebook pages
Wikipedia page
Google+ users
|
Online attention
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
View more on Altmetrics
|
|
|